The governance of agro- and pharmaceutical biotechnology innovation: Public policy and industrial strategy

Abstract Multinational companies in the life science sector are heavily influenced by government policies and regulations and in turn attempt to influence these actors nationally and internationally. This paper focuses on recent and on-going research, principally on the agro-biotechnology and, to a lesser extent, on the pharmaceutical industries, covering the evolution of policy and regulation in Europe, how policies are influenced by stakeholder pressures and how policy in turn influences company strategies for product development. We focus particularly on new ‘governance’ agendas in Europe and consider the relative impacts of enabling, constraining, discriminating and indiscriminate policies on company strategies as part of our development of an integrated approach to policy and governance. We also consider changes in external operating environments for multinational companies and compare past histories and present pressures on agro-biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies. The paper argues, with evidence, that a more enabling and discriminating policy and regulatory environment can achieve public goals more efficiently and effectively, taking account of impacts on innovation, than more blunt policy instruments. This type of environment takes into account the resources and capabilities available to firms and research laboratories rather than relying on broad brush carrot and stick approaches.

[1]  Julie Kent,et al.  Human tissue engineered products—drugs or devices? , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  M. Chiara Mantegazzini The Environmental Risks from Biotechnology , 1986 .

[3]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm , 2000 .

[4]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  The second academic revolution and the rise of entrepreneurial science , 2001, IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag..

[5]  Helen Yanacopulos,et al.  Understanding governance and coalitions: transatlantic networks and the regulation of GMOs , 2003 .

[6]  Ann Bruce,et al.  Risk Analysis and Society: Global Change and Transboundary Risks , 2003 .

[7]  David Wield,et al.  Understanding company R&D strategies in agro-biotechnology: trajectories and blind spots , 2004 .

[8]  B. Peters,et al.  Governance, Politics and the State , 2000 .

[9]  Catherine Lyall,et al.  Foresight in a multi-level governance structure: policy integration and communication , 2004 .

[10]  Joyce Tait,et al.  Policy approaches to research and development: foresight, framework and competitiveness , 1999 .

[11]  M. Bemelmans-videc Carrots, Sticks, and Sermons: Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation. , 1998 .

[12]  Graham Spinardi,et al.  The Governance Challenges of Breakthrough Science and Technology , 2005 .

[13]  S. Jasanoff,et al.  The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. , 1991 .

[14]  N. W. Moore,et al.  The Bird of Time: The Science and Politics of Nature Conservation , 1987 .

[15]  Les Levidow,et al.  Proactive and reactive approaches to risk regulation , 1992 .

[16]  Andrea L. Bonnicksen Crafting a Cloning Policy: From Dolly to Stem Cells , 2002 .

[17]  Farm Buildings,et al.  Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food- , 1956 .

[18]  Jack Sir Lewis,et al.  Thirteenth report : the release of genetically engineered organisms to the environment , 1989 .

[19]  Joyce Tait,et al.  Public policies influencing innovation in the agrochemical, biotechnology and seed industries , 2002 .

[20]  Joyce Tait,et al.  Management of agriculture-related biotechnology constraints on innovation , 1993 .

[21]  Norma Morris,et al.  The Changing Landscape of Regulatory Control of Biological Medicines , 2001, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[22]  D. Coates,et al.  The Release of Genetically-Engineered Organisms. , 1994 .

[23]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[24]  R. Andersen,et al.  The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policymakers , 1991 .

[25]  Joyce Tait,et al.  More Faust than Frankenstein: the European debate about the precautionary principle and risk regulation for genetically modified crops , 2001 .