A Framework for Textbook Analysis

Textbooks are widely accepted as a common feature of classrooms worldwide and are important vehicles for the promotion of curricula. Consequently their content and structure are very important for the promotion of a specific vision of curriculum. There are many features of textbooks, some which go unknown to the authors, which have a significant impact on their target audience. Such features can have positive or negative impacts on learning. Textbook analysis is a means by which these features can be identified and hence the effectiveness of textbooks be established. The author in her research on mathematics textbooks has established a framework for textbook analysis based on the work of Halliday (1973), Morgan (2004), the TIMSS study (Valverde et al., (2002)) and Rivers (1990) which comprises four key elements; Content, Structure, Expectation and Language. The author is hence using her own research on mathematics textbooks to develop and highlight aspects of textbook analysis. Textbook analysis is particularly important to support educational reform and hence this chapter sets out to establish the significance of conducting textbook research and highlighting best practice in the area.

[1]  Bruce K. Britton,et al.  Supporting Readers' Comprehension Through Effective Text Design. , 1984 .

[2]  C. F. Mann.  What's the Use of a Textbook?. , 1981 .

[3]  E. Lenneberg,et al.  Foundations of Language Development: A Multidisciplinary Approach , 1975 .

[4]  David Pimm,et al.  ‘This is so’: a text on texts , 1996 .

[5]  Contextual Analysis of Problems in Algebra I Textbooks. , 1990 .

[6]  Michael Halliday,et al.  Explorations in the functions of language , 1973 .

[7]  Henry H. Walbesser.  Instructional Aids in Mathematics: The Textbook as an Instructional Aid. , 1973 .

[8]  Lisa O'Keeffe.  An investigation into the nature of mathematics textbooks at junior cycle and their role in mathematics education , 2011 .

[9]  John G. Herlihy,et al.  The Textbook Controversy: Issues, Aspects and Perspectives , 1992 .

[10]  James O. Bullock,et al.  Literacy in the Language of Mathematics. , 1994 .

[11]  Diane Ravitch,et al.  The Language Police: How Pressure Groups Restrict What Students Learn , 2003 .

[12]  M. C. Wittrock,et al.  Word Frequency and Reading Comprehensiony1 , 1974 .

[13]  P. Dowling.  A sociological analysis of school mathematics texts , 1996 .

[14]  Margaret J. Kenney,et al.  Multicultural and Gender Equity in the Mathematics Classroom: The Gift of Diversity. 1997 Yearbook. , 1997 .

[15]  Diane Shorrocks-Taylor,et al.  Making it clear: a review of language issues in testing with special reference to the National Curriculum mathematics tests at key stage 2 , 1999 .

[16]  Jaan Mikk,et al.  Textbook: Research and Writing , 2000 .

[17]  B. Davis.  Listening for Differences: An Evolving Conception of Mathematics Teaching. , 1997 .

[18]  C. Hirsch.  Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics , 1988 .

[19]  J. H. McMillan.  Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research , 2001 .

[20]  W. D. Cairns,et al.  THE MATHEMATICAL ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA. , 1918, Science.

[21]  Gilbert A. Valverde.  According to the Book: Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks , 2002 .

[22]  E. Keenan.  Dimensions in Sociolinguistics , 1975, Language in Society.

[23]  T. P. Carpenter,et al.  Learning and teaching with understanding. , 1992 .

[24]  Candia Morgan,et al.  Writing Mathematically: The Discourse of 'Investigation' , 1998 .

[25]  D. Pimm,et al.  Speaking Mathematically: Communication in Mathematics Classrooms , 1987 .

[26]  W. D. Cairns.  THE MATHEMATICAL ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA. , 1917, Science.

[27]  Richard Reviewer-Granger.  Unified Theories of Cognition , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  George Gerbner,et al.  Toward “Cultural Indicators”: The analysis of mass mediated public message systems , 1969 .

[29]  George R. Klare,et al.  The measurement of readability , 1963 .

[30]  Jeremy Kilpatrick,et al.  International handbook of mathematics education , 1997 .

[31]  H. D. Hoover,et al.  The Effects of Adjusting Readability on the Difficulty of Mathematics Story Problems. , 1986 .

[32]  D Moshman,et al.  Math and science education. , 1983, Science.

[33]  James T. Robinson.  Research in Science Education: New Questions, New Directions. , 1981 .

[34]  Candia Morgan,et al.  An analysis of the discourse of written reports of investigative work in GCSE mathematics , 1995 .

[35]  James Noonan.  Readability problems presented by mathematics text , 1990 .

[36]  William H. Schmidt,et al.  Refocusing U.S. Math and Science Education. , 1998 .

[37]  A. Newell.  Unified Theories of Cognition , 1990 .

[38]  Philip W. Jackson,et al.  Handbook of research on curriculum : a project of the American Educational Research Association , 1992 .