Deep‐sea sponge derived environmental DNA analysis reveals demersal fish biodiversity of a remote Arctic ecosystem
暂无分享,去创建一个
S. Knudsen | U. Hentschel | K. Busch | J. Xavier | P. Møller | M. Sweet | H. K. Meyer | O. Brodnicke
[1] A. Davies,et al. Beyond the tip of the seamount: Distinct megabenthic communities found beyond the charismatic summit sponge ground on an arctic seamount (Schulz Bank, Arctic Mid-Ocean Ridge) , 2022, Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers.
[2] X. Pochon,et al. Moving environmental DNA (eDNA) technologies from benchtop to the field using passive sampling and PDQeX extraction , 2022, Environmental DNA.
[3] A. Boetius,et al. Biodiversity, environmental drivers, and sustainability of the global deep-sea sponge microbiome , 2022, Nature Communications.
[4] E. E. Sigsgaard,et al. Accumulation and diversity of airborne, eukaryotic environmental DNA , 2022, Environmental DNA.
[5] Jun-sheng Li,et al. eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool to monitor fish diversity in Beijing water systems compared with ground cages , 2022, Scientific Reports.
[6] J. Middelburg,et al. The important role of sponges in carbon and nitrogen cycling in a deep‐sea biological hotspot , 2022, Functional Ecology.
[7] M. Kühl,et al. Disentangling compartment functions in sessile marine invertebrates. , 2022, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[8] Lynsey R. Harper,et al. Environmental DNA persistence and fish detection in captive sponges , 2022, bioRxiv.
[9] S. Knudsen,et al. A National Scale “BioBlitz” Using Citizen Science and eDNA Metabarcoding for Monitoring Coastal Marine Fish , 2022, Frontiers in Marine Science.
[10] S. Knudsen,et al. Short‐term temporal variation of coastal marine eDNA , 2022, Environmental DNA.
[11] M. Miya. Environmental DNA Metabarcoding: A Novel Method for Biodiversity Monitoring of Marine Fish Communities. , 2021, Annual review of marine science.
[12] M. Bertelsen,et al. Airborne environmental DNA for terrestrial vertebrate community monitoring , 2021, Current Biology.
[13] Torbjørn Ekrem,et al. The Future of DNA Barcoding: Reflections from Early Career Researchers , 2021, Diversity.
[14] H. Reveron,et al. Passive sampling of environmental DNA in aquatic environments using 3D-printed hydroxyapatite samplers , 2021, bioRxiv.
[15] J. Poulain,et al. Evaluating sediment and water sampling methods for the estimation of deep-sea biodiversity using environmental DNA , 2021, Scientific Reports.
[16] A. Baattrup‐Pedersen,et al. Seasonal turnover in community composition of stream‐associated macroinvertebrates inferred from freshwater environmental DNA metabarcoding , 2021, Environmental DNA.
[17] J. Adolf,et al. Trawl and eDNA assessment of marine fish diversity, seasonality, and relative abundance in coastal New Jersey, USA , 2021 .
[18] M. Maldonado,et al. A Microbial Nitrogen Engine Modulated by Bacteriosyncytia in Hexactinellid Sponges: Ecological Implications for Deep-Sea Communities , 2021, Frontiers in Marine Science.
[19] A. Munguía-Vega,et al. Integrating eDNA metabarcoding and simultaneous underwater visual surveys to describe complex fish communities in a marine biodiversity hotspot , 2021, Molecular ecology resources.
[20] S. Domisch,et al. Improving the reliability of eDNA data interpretation , 2021, Molecular ecology resources.
[21] Bessey Cindy,et al. Passive eDNA collection enhances aquatic biodiversity analysis. , 2021, Communications biology.
[22] C. Pham,et al. The First Cut Is the Deepest: Trawl Effects on a Deep-Sea Sponge Ground Are Pronounced Four Years on , 2020, Frontiers in Marine Science.
[23] A. Antich,et al. More Than Expected From Old Sponge Samples: A Natural Sampler DNA Metabarcoding Assessment of Marine Fish Diversity in Nha Trang Bay (Vietnam) , 2020, Frontiers in Marine Science.
[24] Nicholas D. Higgs,et al. A decade to study deep-sea life , 2020, Nature Ecology & Evolution.
[25] S. Manel,et al. Comparing environmental DNA metabarcoding and underwater visual census to monitor tropical reef fishes , 2020, Environmental DNA.
[26] L. Jørgensen,et al. Responding to global warming: New fisheries management measures in the Arctic , 2020 .
[27] T. Morganti,et al. Trophic niche separation that facilitates co‐existence of high and low microbial abundance sponges is revealed by in situ study of carbon and nitrogen fluxes , 2020, Limnology and Oceanography.
[28] E. Nielsen,et al. Remote, autonomous real-time monitoring of environmental DNA from commercial fish , 2020, Scientific Reports.
[29] Lauren M. Sassoubre,et al. Design and Validation of Passive Environmental DNA Samplers (PEDS) using Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) and Montmorillonite Clay (MC). , 2020, Environmental science & technology.
[30] R. Brys,et al. eDNA‐based monitoring: Advancement in management and conservation of critically endangered killifish species , 2020 .
[31] U. Hentschel,et al. Microbial diversity of the glass sponge Vazella pourtalesii in response to anthropogenic activities , 2020, Conservation Genetics.
[32] H. Buckley,et al. A Systematic Review of Sources of Variability and Uncertainty in eDNA Data for Environmental Monitoring , 2020, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.
[33] Richard T. Corlett,et al. Applications of environmental DNA (eDNA) in ecology and conservation: opportunities, challenges and prospects , 2020, Biodiversity and Conservation.
[34] Gerald H Taranto,et al. Climate‐induced changes in the suitable habitat of cold‐water corals and commercially important deep‐sea fishes in the North Atlantic , 2020, Global change biology.
[35] E. Harvey,et al. eDNA metabarcoding survey reveals fine‐scale coral reef community variation across a remote, tropical island ecosystem , 2020, Molecular ecology.
[36] A. Jamieson,et al. Ecological variables for developing a global deep-ocean monitoring and conservation strategy , 2020, Nature Ecology & Evolution.
[37] A. Franke,et al. On giant shoulders: how a seamount affects the microbial community composition of seawater and sponges , 2020, Biogeosciences.
[38] T. Morganti,et al. Size Is the Major Determinant of Pumping Rates in Marine Sponges , 2019, Front. Physiol..
[39] I. Salter,et al. Environmental DNA concentrations are correlated with regional biomass of Atlantic cod in oceanic waters , 2019, Communications Biology.
[40] T. Frøslev,et al. Using vertebrate environmental DNA from seawater in biomonitoring of marine habitats , 2019, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.
[41] K. Scribner,et al. Comparison of fish detections, community diversity, and relative abundance using environmental DNA metabarcoding and traditional gears , 2019, Environmental DNA.
[42] M. Maldonado,et al. Removal of deep-sea sponges by bottom trawling in the Flemish Cap area: conservation, ecology and economic assessment , 2019, Scientific Reports.
[43] A. Davies,et al. Spatial patterns of arctic sponge ground fauna and demersal fish are detectable in autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) imagery , 2019, Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers.
[44] Soon-Jin Hwang,et al. Effects of Microbial Activity and Environmental Parameters on the Degradation of Extracellular Environmental DNA from a Eutrophic Lake , 2019, International journal of environmental research and public health.
[45] S. Mariani,et al. Sponges as natural environmental DNA samplers , 2019, Current Biology.
[46] Ellen Kenchington,et al. Glass sponge grounds on the Scotian Shelf and their associated biodiversity , 2019, Marine Ecology Progress Series.
[47] H. Spencer,et al. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding reveals strong discrimination among diverse marine habitats connected by water movement , 2019, Molecular ecology resources.
[48] R. Brys,et al. Influence of accuracy, repeatability and detection probability in the reliability of species-specific eDNA based approaches , 2019, Scientific Reports.
[49] S. Knudsen,et al. A checklist of the fish fauna of Greenland waters , 2018, Zootaxa.
[50] A. Davies,et al. Oceanographic setting and short-timescale environmental variability at an Arctic seamount sponge ground , 2018, Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers.
[51] L. Watling,et al. Out of Sight, But Within Reach: A Global History of Bottom-Trawled Deep-Sea Fisheries From >400 m Depth , 2018, Front. Mar. Sci..
[52] H. H. Bruun,et al. Algorithm for post-clustering curation of DNA amplicon data yields reliable biodiversity estimates , 2017, Nature Communications.
[53] Michael Bunce,et al. Ecosystem biomonitoring with eDNA: metabarcoding across the tree of life in a tropical marine environment , 2017, Scientific Reports.
[54] J. Hestetun,et al. A review of carnivorous sponges (Porifera: Cladorhizidae) from the Boreal North Atlantic and Arctic , 2017 .
[55] T. Thomas,et al. Predicting the HMA-LMA Status in Marine Sponges by Machine Learning , 2017, Front. Microbiol..
[56] A. Olsen,et al. Arctic Intermediate Water in the Nordic Seas, 1991–2009 , 2017 .
[57] Paul J. McMurdie,et al. DADA2: High resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data , 2016, Nature Methods.
[58] L. Levin,et al. The deep ocean under climate change , 2015, Science.
[59] M. Collins,et al. Trophodynamics of Protomyctophum (Myctophidae) in the Scotia Sea (Southern Ocean). , 2015, Journal of fish biology.
[60] M. Kondoh,et al. MiFish, a set of universal PCR primers for metabarcoding environmental DNA from fishes: detection of more than 230 subtropical marine species , 2015, Royal Society Open Science.
[61] Eske Willerslev,et al. Environmental DNA - An emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity , 2015 .
[62] V. Tunnicliffe,et al. Benthic grazing and carbon sequestration by deep‐water glass sponge reefs , 2015 .
[63] J. S. Christiansen,et al. Arctic marine fishes and their fisheries in light of global change , 2013, Global change biology.
[64] P. Cárdenas,et al. Taxonomy, biogeography and DNA barcodes of Geodia species (Porifera, Demospongiae, Tetractinellida) in the Atlantic boreo-arctic region , 2013 .
[65] M. Koen-Alonso,et al. Associations of demersal fish with sponge grounds on the continental slopes of the northwest Atlantic , 2013 .
[66] M. Antelo,et al. Sustainability of deep-sea fish species under the European Union Common Fisheries Policy , 2012 .
[67] S. Holmes,et al. Denoising PCR-amplified metagenome data , 2012, BMC Bioinformatics.
[68] Roberto Danovaro,et al. Deep, diverse and definitely different: unique attributes of the world's largest ecosystem , 2010 .
[69] J. Weisz,et al. Do associated microbial abundances impact marine demosponge pumping rates and tissue densities? , 2008, Oecologia.
[70] A. Klitgaard,et al. Distribution and species composition of mass occurrences of large-sized sponges in the northeast Atlantic , 2004 .
[71] H. Spencer,et al. Water stratification in the marine biome restricts vertical environmental DNA (eDNA) signal dispersal , 2019, Environmental DNA.