Decision-Level Fusion of EEG and Pupil Features for Single-Trial Visual Detection Analysis

Several recent studies have reported success in applying EEG-based signal analysis to achieve accurate single-trial classification of responses to visual target detection. Pupil responses are proposed as a complementary modality that can support improved accuracy of single-trial signal analysis. We develop a pupillary response feature-extraction and -selection procedure that helps to improve the classification performance of a system based only on EEG signal analysis. We apply a two-level linear classifier to obtain cognitive-task-related analysis of EEG and pupil responses. The classification results based on the two modalities are then fused at the decision level. Here, the goal is to support increased classification confidence through the inherent modality complementarities. The fusion results show significant improvement over classification performance based on a single modality.

[1]  P. Sajda,et al.  Cortically coupled computer vision for rapid image search , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[2]  Misha Pavel,et al.  Rapid image analysis using neural signals , 2008, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[3]  L.W. Nolte,et al.  Design and Performance Comparison of Distributed Detection Networks , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[4]  A. Wayne Whitney,et al.  A Direct Method of Nonparametric Measurement Selection , 1971, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[5]  R. Brem The never‐ending controversies of screening mammography , 2004, Cancer.

[6]  Lucas C. Parra,et al.  Recipes for the linear analysis of EEG , 2005, NeuroImage.

[7]  Thomas Marill,et al.  On the effectiveness of receptors in recognition systems , 1963, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[8]  Lawrence Stark,et al.  Neurophysiological Model of the Normal and Abnormal Human Pupil , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  S. Klein,et al.  Pupil dilation during visual target detection. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[10]  Josef Kittler,et al.  Floating search methods in feature selection , 1994, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[11]  L Stark,et al.  Single neuron activity in the pupillary system. , 1970, Brain research.

[12]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Feature Selection: Evaluation, Application, and Small Sample Performance , 1997, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[13]  Mario Aguilar,et al.  Using EMG to anticipate head motion for virtual-environment applications , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  I. E. Loewenfeld,et al.  The Pupil: Anatomy, Physiology, and Clinical Applications , 1999 .

[15]  J. Beatty,et al.  The pupillary system. , 2000 .

[16]  P. Sajda,et al.  Response error correction-a demonstration of improved human-machine performance using real-time EEG monitoring , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[17]  Lucas C. Parra,et al.  Cortical origins of response time variability during rapid discrimination of visual objects , 2005, NeuroImage.

[18]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[19]  J. Beatty Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. , 1982 .

[20]  Belur V. Dasarathy,et al.  Decision fusion , 1994 .