A methodology for the structural and functional analysis of signaling and regulatory networks

BackgroundStructural analysis of cellular interaction networks contributes to a deeper understanding of network-wide interdependencies, causal relationships, and basic functional capabilities. While the structural analysis of metabolic networks is a well-established field, similar methodologies have been scarcely developed and applied to signaling and regulatory networks.ResultsWe propose formalisms and methods, relying on adapted and partially newly introduced approaches, which facilitate a structural analysis of signaling and regulatory networks with focus on functional aspects. We use two different formalisms to represent and analyze interaction networks: interaction graphs and (logical) interaction hypergraphs. We show that, in interaction graphs, the determination of feedback cycles and of all the signaling paths between any pair of species is equivalent to the computation of elementary modes known from metabolic networks. Knowledge on the set of signaling paths and feedback loops facilitates the computation of intervention strategies and the classification of compounds into activators, inhibitors, ambivalent factors, and non-affecting factors with respect to a certain species. In some cases, qualitative effects induced by perturbations can be unambiguously predicted from the network scheme. Interaction graphs however, are not able to capture AND relationships which do frequently occur in interaction networks. The consequent logical concatenation of all the arcs pointing into a species leads to Boolean networks. For a Boolean representation of cellular interaction networks we propose a formalism based on logical (or signed) interaction hypergraphs, which facilitates in particular a logical steady state analysis (LSSA). LSSA enables studies on the logical processing of signals and the identification of optimal intervention points (targets) in cellular networks. LSSA also reveals network regions whose parametrization and initial states are crucial for the dynamic behavior.We have implemented these methods in our software tool CellNetAnalyzer (successor of FluxAnalyzer) and illustrate their applicability using a logical model of T-Cell receptor signaling providing non-intuitive results regarding feedback loops, essential elements, and (logical) signal processing upon different stimuli.ConclusionThe methods and formalisms we propose herein are another step towards the comprehensive functional analysis of cellular interaction networks. Their potential, shown on a realistic T-cell signaling model, makes them a promising tool.

[1]  Tilman Brummer,et al.  Feedback regulation of lymphocyte signalling , 2004, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[2]  H. Kitano,et al.  A comprehensive pathway map of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling , 2005, Molecular systems biology.

[3]  J. Downward The ins and outs of signalling , 2001, Nature.

[4]  B. Palsson,et al.  Genome-scale models of microbial cells: evaluating the consequences of constraints , 2004, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[5]  Hidde de Jong,et al.  Modeling and Simulation of Genetic Regulatory Systems: A Literature Review , 2002, J. Comput. Biol..

[6]  H. Sauro,et al.  Quantitative analysis of signaling networks. , 2004, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[7]  M. Newman,et al.  Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  C. Espinosa-Soto,et al.  A Gene Regulatory Network Model for Cell-Fate Determination during Arabidopsis thaliana Flower Development That Is Robust and Recovers Experimental Gene Expression Profilesw⃞ , 2004, The Plant Cell Online.

[9]  H. Othmer,et al.  The topology of the regulatory interactions predicts the expression pattern of the segment polarity genes in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  Modern Graph Theory , 2002, Graduate Texts in Mathematics.

[11]  Sheraz Yaqub,et al.  Release from Tonic Inhibition of T Cell Activation through Transient Displacement of C-terminal Src Kinase (Csk) from Lipid Rafts* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  Lei Duan,et al.  The Cbl family and other ubiquitin ligases: destructive forces in control of antigen receptor signaling. , 2004, Immunity.

[13]  Hao Xiong,et al.  Network-based regulatory pathways analysis , 2004, Bioinform..

[14]  Jason A. Papin,et al.  Topological analysis of mass-balanced signaling networks: a framework to obtain network properties including crosstalk. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  Andreas Wagner,et al.  Compactness and Cycles in Signal Transduction and transcriptional Regulation Networks: a Signature of Natural Selection? , 2004, Adv. Complex Syst..

[16]  Arthur Weiss,et al.  A Diacylglycerol-Protein Kinase C-RasGRP1 Pathway Directs Ras Activation upon Antigen Receptor Stimulation of T Cells , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[17]  Eduardo D. Sontag,et al.  Inferring dynamic architecture of cellular networks using time series of gene expression, protein and metabolite data , 2004, Bioinform..

[18]  R. Thomas,et al.  Multistationarity, the basis of cell differentiation and memory. I. Structural conditions of multistationarity and other nontrivial behavior. , 2001, Chaos.

[19]  Burkhart Schraven,et al.  Transmembrane adaptor proteins: organizers of immunoreceptor signalling , 2004, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[20]  R. Heinrich,et al.  The Regulation of Cellular Systems , 1996, Springer US.

[21]  S. Schuster,et al.  Metabolic network structure determines key aspects of functionality and regulation , 2002, Nature.

[22]  P. Brazhnik,et al.  Linking the genes: inferring quantitative gene networks from microarray data. , 2002, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[23]  Steffen Klamt,et al.  FluxAnalyzer: exploring structure, pathways, and flux distributions in metabolic networks on interactive flux maps , 2003, Bioinform..

[24]  G. Casari,et al.  From molecular networks to qualitative cell behavior , 2005, FEBS letters.

[25]  S. Klamt,et al.  Generalized concept of minimal cut sets in biochemical networks. , 2006, Bio Systems.

[26]  E. Benjamini,et al.  Immunology: A Short Course , 1988 .

[27]  C. Soulé Graphic Requirements for Multistationarity , 2004, Complexus.

[28]  Jeff Hasty,et al.  Engineered gene circuits , 2002, Nature.

[29]  Burkhart Schraven,et al.  The role of adaptor proteins in lymphocyte activation. , 2004, Molecular immunology.

[30]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Untangling the wires: A strategy to trace functional interactions in signaling and gene networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Yanping Huang,et al.  T Cell Receptor Signaling: Beyond Complex Complexes* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[32]  Dominik Filipp,et al.  Lipid rafts: resolution of the "fyn problem"? , 2004, Molecular immunology.

[33]  J. Schlessinger,et al.  Signaling by Receptor Tyrosine Kinases , 1993 .

[34]  David S. Johnson,et al.  Dimacs series in discrete mathematics and theoretical computer science , 1996 .

[35]  S. Kauffman Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[36]  Steffen Klamt,et al.  Minimal cut sets in biochemical reaction networks , 2004, Bioinform..

[37]  M. Newman Erratum: Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality (Physical Review e (2001) 64 (016132)) , 2006 .

[38]  Andrew V. Zeigarnik,et al.  On hypercycles and hypercircuits in hypergraphs , 1998, Discrete Mathematical Chemistry.

[39]  Jason A. Papin,et al.  Reconstruction of cellular signalling networks and analysis of their properties , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[40]  Steffen Klamt,et al.  Calculability analysis in underdetermined metabolic networks illustrated by a model of the central metabolism in purple nonsulfur bacteria. , 2002, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[41]  Reinhart Heinrich,et al.  Structural analysis of expanding metabolic networks. , 2004, Genome informatics. International Conference on Genome Informatics.

[42]  Shinya Kuroda,et al.  Prediction and validation of the distinct dynamics of transient and sustained ERK activation , 2005, Nature Cell Biology.

[43]  D. Fell,et al.  A general definition of metabolic pathways useful for systematic organization and analysis of complex metabolic networks , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.

[44]  Larry Lok,et al.  Software for Signaling Networks, Electronic and Cellular , 2002, Science's STKE.

[45]  E. Gilles,et al.  Computational modeling of the dynamics of the MAP kinase cascade activated by surface and internalized EGF receptors , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[46]  Jason A. Papin,et al.  The JAK-STAT signaling network in the human B-cell: an extreme signaling pathway analysis. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[47]  P. Hansen,et al.  Discrete Mathematical Chemistry , 2000 .

[48]  M Kaufman,et al.  A logical analysis of T cell activation and anergy. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  Robert E. Tarjan,et al.  Enumeration of the Elementary Circuits of a Directed Graph , 1972, SIAM J. Comput..

[50]  Jonathan L. Gross,et al.  Handbook of graph theory , 2007, Discrete mathematics and its applications.

[51]  Mark P. Styczynski,et al.  Overview of computational methods for the inference of gene regulatory networks , 2005, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[52]  J. Schlessinger Cell Signaling by Receptor Tyrosine Kinases , 2000, Cell.

[53]  Burkhart Schraven,et al.  Transmembrane adaptor proteins: organizers of immunoreceptor signalling , 2004, Nature reviews. Immunology.

[54]  Martine Labbé,et al.  Identification of all steady states in large networks by logical analysis , 2003, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[55]  Juan Carlos Nuño,et al.  METATOOL: for studying metabolic networks , 1999, Bioinform..

[56]  Stefan Schuster,et al.  A theoretical framework for detecting signal transfer routes in signalling networks , 2005, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[57]  Kenneth J. Kauffman,et al.  Advances in flux balance analysis. , 2003, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[58]  B. Kholodenko,et al.  Negative feedback and ultrasensitivity can bring about oscillations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades. , 2000, European journal of biochemistry.

[59]  Peter F. Stadler,et al.  Relevant cycles in Chemical reaction Networks , 2001, Adv. Complex Syst..

[60]  Bernd Binder,et al.  Interrelations between dynamical properties and structural characteristics of signal transduction networks. , 2004, Genome informatics. International Conference on Genome Informatics.

[61]  J. Metraux,et al.  Numeric simulation of plant signaling networks. , 2001, Plant physiology.

[62]  H. Varmus,et al.  Requirement for Tec kinases Rlk and Itk in T cell receptor signaling and immunity. , 1999, Science.

[63]  Steffen Klamt,et al.  Computation of elementary modes: a unifying framework and the new binary approach , 2004, BMC Bioinformatics.

[64]  Robert Urbanczik,et al.  An improved algorithm for stoichiometric network analysis: theory and applications , 2005, Bioinform..

[65]  William I. Gasarch Review of "Handbook of Graph Theory edited by Gross and Yellen." CRC, 2004. , 2004, SIGA.

[66]  S Klamt,et al.  Algorithmic approaches for computing elementary modes in large biochemical reaction networks. , 2005, Systems biology.

[67]  James E. Ferrell,et al.  A positive-feedback-based bistable ‘memory module’ that governs a cell fate decision , 2007, Nature.

[68]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Lethality and centrality in protein networks , 2001, Nature.

[69]  Denis Thieffry,et al.  Genetic control of flower morphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana: a logical analysis , 1999, Bioinform..

[70]  K. Sachs,et al.  Causal Protein-Signaling Networks Derived from Multiparameter Single-Cell Data , 2005, Science.