The Digital Inclusiveness of State Library Websites

Abstract Purpose Digital inclusivity is about making web sites available to users regardless of a user’s device or disability. This study seeks to find out how accessible and mobile ready state library web sites are and if there is a relationship between web site accessibility and mobile readiness. Methodology/approach I examined web site accessibility through automated code evaluation and manual code inspection of the web site homepage. I evaluated mobile readiness by comparing how homepages displayed on a desktop computer vs. a smart phone. Findings Most state library web sites had accessibility problems, including missing alternative text for images (82%), inaccessible forms (54%), and poor contrast between text and background (56%). Only 36% of the sites were mobile ready. A Spearman rho analysis of accessibility and mobile readiness found that the more accessible a site is, the more likely it is mobile ready (and vice versa). Research limitations/implications While this study identified accessibility and mobile readiness issues, it does not address why these problems exist. In addition, the unit of analysis was limited to the web site homepage. The study’s results emphasize the need to combine manual code inspection with automated analysis, particularly for images’ alternative text. Practical implications The study suggests that state libraries need to take greater care in meeting accessibility standards, particularly easily followed standards such as providing appropriate alternative text for images. Originality/value Despite the importance of state libraries in organizing and funding local libraries, there has been little research to date on state library web sites.

[1]  Stephanie L. Maatta Smith Web Accessibility Assessment of Urban Public Library Websites , 2014, Public Libr. Q..

[2]  Susan A. Youngblood,et al.  User experience and accessibility: an analysis of county web portals , 2013 .

[3]  Norman E. Youngblood Revisiting Alabama state website accessibility , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[4]  David L. Baker Website Usability of the Most Populous Counties in the United States , 2007 .

[5]  Jonathan Lazar,et al.  Equal Access to Information? Evaluating the Accessibility of Public Library Web Sites in the State of Maryland , 2012 .

[6]  Jo Mackiewicz,et al.  A usability analysis of municipal government website home pages in Alabama , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[7]  Colin H. C. Machin,et al.  Guidelines, icons and marketable skills: an accessibility evaluation of 100 web development company homepages , 2012, W4A.

[8]  Andrew Potter Accessibility of Alabama government Web sites , 2002 .

[9]  Jonathan Lazar,et al.  Are separate interfaces inherently unequal?: an evaluation with blind users of the usability of two interfaces for a social networking platform , 2011, iConference.

[10]  Jennifer S. Evans-Cowley The Accessibility of Municipal Government Websites , 2006 .

[11]  John Brobst Evaluating the Accessibility of Florida's Public Library Home Pages , 2009 .

[12]  Kimberly A. Neuendorf,et al.  The Content Analysis Guidebook , 2001 .

[13]  Mi Yeon Lee,et al.  The development of public smart phone apps in Korea: empirical approach , 2012, ICEGOV.

[14]  David C. Yen,et al.  Migrating from WCAG 1.0 to WCAG 2.0 - A comparative study based on Web Content Accessibility Guidelines in Taiwan , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  George Sylvan Bobinski Carnegie Libraries: Their History and Impact on American Public Library Development , 1969 .

[16]  L. R. Wise,et al.  Disability Access and E-Government , 2008 .

[17]  Richard A. M. Schilhavy,et al.  Effective US Health System Websites: Establishing Benchmarks and Standards for Effective Consumer Engagement , 2012, Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives.

[18]  Robert Anthony Galvez,et al.  e-Government in Rhode Island: what effects do templates have on usability, accessibility, and mobile readiness? , 2014, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[19]  A. Barbaro,et al.  Health information in Italian public health websites: moving from inaccessibility to accessibility. , 2005, Health information and libraries journal.

[20]  Retta Evans,et al.  The Healthy Web--Access to Online Health Information for Individuals with Disabilities. , 2011 .

[21]  Tina McCorkindale,et al.  An analysis of the mobile readiness and dialogic principles on Fortune 500 mobile websites , 2013 .

[22]  Eleanor T. Loiacono-Mello,et al.  Corporate website accessibility: does legislation matter? , 2011, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[23]  Julia Huprich,et al.  How Accessible Are Public Libraries’ Web Sites? A Study of Georgia Public Libraries , 2009 .

[24]  Shin-Yuan Hung,et al.  User acceptance of mobile e-government services: An empirical study , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[25]  Joseph F. Shubert,et al.  The Impact of the Federal Library Services and Construction Act. , 1975 .

[26]  Jonathan Lazar,et al.  Accessibility of U.S. federal government home pages: Section 508 compliance and site accessibility statements , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..