Oscillations of polymeric microbubbles: effect of the encapsulating shell

A model for the oscillation of gas bubbles encapsulated in a thin shell has been developed. The model depends on viscous and elastic properties of the shell, described by thickness, shear modulus, and shear viscosity. This theory was used to describe an experimental ultrasound contrast agent from Nycomed, composed of air bubbles encapsulated in a polymer shell. Theoretical calculations were compared with measurements of acoustic attenuation at amplitudes where bubble oscillations are linear. A good fit between measured and calculated results was obtained. The results were used to estimate the viscoelastic properties of the shell material. The shell shear modulus was estimated to between 10.6 and 12.9 MPa, the shell viscosity was estimated to between 0.39 and 0.49 Pas. The shell thickness was 5% of the particle radius. These results imply that the particles are around 20 times more rigid than free air bubbles, and that the oscillations are heavily damped, corresponding to Q-values around 1. We conclude that the shell strongly alters the acoustic behavior of the bubbles: The stiffness and viscosity of the particles are mainly determined by the encapsulating shell, not by the air inside.

[1]  Sverre Holm,et al.  Modelling of the ultrasound return from Albunex microspheres , 1994 .

[2]  M. Minnaert.  XVI.On musical air-bubbles and the sounds of running water , 1933 .

[3]  H. G. Flynn.  Cavitation dynamics. I. A mathematical formulation , 1975 .

[4]  N de Jong,et al.  Acoustic modeling of shell-encapsulated gas bubbles. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  Andrea Prosperetti,et al.  Bubble phenomena in sound fields: part one , 1984 .

[6]  Karl F. Herzfeld,et al.  Gas Bubbles with Organic Skin as Cavitation Nuclei , 1954 .

[7]  Andrea Prosperetti,et al.  Nonlinear oscillations of gas bubbles in liquids: steady‐state solutions , 1974 .

[8]  Michael J. Miksis,et al.  Bubble Oscillations of Large Amplitude , 1980 .

[9]  R Gramiak,et al.  Echocardiography of the aortic root. , 1968, Investigative radiology.

[10]  D. Miller,et al.  Ultrasonic detection of resonant cavitation bubbles in a flow tube by their second-harmonic emissions , 1981 .

[11]  K. Bjerknes,et al.  Preparation of polymeric microbubbles: formulation studies and product characterisation , 1997 .

[12]  Charles C. Church,et al.  The effects of an elastic solid surface layer on the radial pulsations of gas bubbles , 1995 .

[13]  Werner Lauterborn,et al.  Numerical investigation of nonlinear oscillations of gas bubbles in liquids , 1976 .

[14]  L. Hoff,et al.  Acoustic properties of NC100100 and their relation with the microbubble size distribution. , 1999, Investigative radiology.

[15]  C. Devin,et al.  SURVEY OF THERMAL, RADIATION, AND VISCOUS DAMPING OF PULSATING AIR BUBBLES IN WATER , 1959 .

[16]  L. Rayleigh.  VIII. On the pressure developed in a liquid during the collapse of a spherical cavity , 1917 .

[17]  Anthony I. Eller,et al.  Damping Constants of Pulsating Bubbles , 1970 .

[18]  V. G. Welsby,et al.  Ultrasonic monitoring of decompression. , 1968, Lancet.

[19]  Leon Trilling,et al.  The Collapse and Rebound of a Gas Bubble , 1952 .

[20]  H. Medwin,et al.  Counting bubbles acoustically: a review , 1977 .

[21]  N de Jong,et al.  Ultrasound scattering properties of Albunex microspheres. , 1993, Ultrasonics.

[22]  N de Jong,et al.  Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: theoretical considerations and some measurements. , 1992, Ultrasonics.