Understanding Conflict in Virtual Teams: An Experimental Investigation using Content Analysis

Virtual teams are temporally and geographically dispersed groups, which may have members from varied cultures and backgrounds. Such diversity may cause intra-group conflicts in virtual teams. We analyzed the contents of the transcripts of GSS-based virtual teams and identified the conflict episodes and the approaches followed to resolve intra-group conflicts. The conflict episodes that occurred in the early phases of decision-making were separated from those taking place in the choice phase. The results revealed that conflicts in the choice phase of decision-making were detrimental to global virtual teams. We also found that groups following an integrative conflict resolution style had better performance than those following other conflict resolution approaches, such as a distributive style. While the results contribute towards the understanding of conflict in groups, the area warrants further research.

[1]  Mahesh S. Raisinghani,et al.  An empirical study of best practices in virtual teams , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[2]  K. Jehn.  A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[3]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  The Impact of Group Support Systems on Group Conflict and Conflict Management , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[4]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[5]  John e. Jones.  Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument , 1976 .

[6]  Anthony R. Hendrickson,et al.  Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future , 1998 .

[7]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Structuring Conflict in Individual, Face‐to‐Face, and Computer‐Mediated Group Decision Making: Carping Versus Objective Devil's Advocacy , 1995 .

[8]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999 .

[9]  M. Lynn.  Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1996 .

[10]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  The Effects of Variations in Capabilities of GDSS Designs on Management of Cognitive Conflict in Groups , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  CONFLICT AND SHARED IDENTITY IN GEOGRAPHICALLY DISTRIBUTED TEAMS , 2001 .

[12]  Peter Mykytyn,et al.  The collaborative conflict management style and cultural diversity in DGSS supported fuzzy tasks: an experimental investigation , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[13]  M. Rahim,et al.  A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. , 1983, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[14]  Beth H. Jones,et al.  Impact of Communication Medium and Computer Support on Group Perceptions and Performance: A Comparison of Face-to-Face and Dispersed Meetings , 1993, MIS Q..

[15]  Charles R. Schwenk,et al.  Agreement and thinking alike: ingredients for poor decisions , 1990 .

[16]  Herbert A. Simon.  The new science of management decision. , 1960 .

[17]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Becoming a Virtual Professor: Pedagogical Roles and Asynchronous Learning Networks , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  Getting a Clue , 1996 .

[19]  Ralph H. Kilmann,et al.  Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument , 1974 .

[20]  David A. Houston,et al.  Comparison of Paired Choice Alternatives and Choice Conflict , 1996 .

[21]  Michael E. Holmes,et al.  Conflict management in a computer-supported meeting in a computer supported meeting environment , 1991 .

[22]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Distributed Group Support Systems , 1993, MIS Q..

[23]  Colin Seymour-Ure,et al.  Content Analysis in Communication Research. , 1972 .

[24]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Getting It Together: Temporal Coordination and Conflict Management in Global Virtual Teams , 2001 .

[25]  Audrey D. Smith.  Another look at content analysis: an essay review , 1982 .

[26]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structure of "Unstructured" Decision Processes , 1976 .

[27]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  The Phenomenology of Conflict in Distributed Work Teams , 2002 .

[28]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Leadership Effectiveness in Global Virtual Teams , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[29]  D. Schweiger,et al.  Group Approaches for Improving Strategic Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy, and Consensus , 1986 .

[30]  John J. Sosik,et al.  Work-Group Characteristics and Performance in Collectivistic and Individualistic Cultures , 2002, The Journal of social psychology.

[31]  Peter Mykytyn,et al.  Impact of heterogeneity and collaborative conflict management style on the performance of synchronous global virtual teams , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[32]  Mark J. Zbaracki,et al.  Strategic decision making , 1992 .

[33]  Peter Mykytyn,et al.  Conflict in GSS-based Virtual Teams: Findings from an Experiment , 2004, AMCIS.

[34]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. , 1972 .

[35]  Jessica Lipnack,et al.  Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time, and Organizations with Technology , 1997 .

[36]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  Information systems development by US-Norwegian virtual teams: implications of time and space , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[37]  Linda Haggarty,et al.  content analysis , 2022, The Fairchild Books Dictionary of Fashion.

[38]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  A comparative content analysis of face-to-face vs. asynchronous group decision making , 2003, Decis. Support Syst..

[39]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .