A Lightweight Hyperspectral Mapping System and Photogrammetric Processing Chain for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

During the last years commercial hyperspectral imaging sensors have been miniaturized and their performance has been demonstrated on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV). However currently the commercial hyperspectral systems still require minimum payload capacity of approximately 3 kg, forcing usage of rather large UAVs. In this article we present a lightweight hyperspectral mapping system (HYMSY) for rotor-based UAVs, the novel processing chain for the system, and its potential for agricultural mapping and monitoring applications. The HYMSY consists of a custom-made pushbroom spectrometer (400–950 nm, 9 nm FWHM, 25 lines/s, 328 px/line), a photogrammetric camera, and a miniature GPS-Inertial Navigation System. The weight of HYMSY in ready-to-fly configuration is only 2.0 kg and it has been constructed mostly from off-the-shelf components. The processing chain uses a photogrammetric algorithm to produce a Digital Surface Model (DSM) and provides high accuracy orientation of the system over the DSM. The pushbroom data is georectified by projecting it onto the DSM with the support of photogrammetric orientations and the GPS-INS data. Since an up-to-date DSM is produced internally, no external data are required and the processing chain is capable to georectify pushbroom data fully automatically. The system has been adopted for several experimental flights related to agricultural and habitat monitoring applications. For a typical flight, an area of 2–10 ha was mapped, producing a RGB orthomosaic at 1–5 cm resolution, a DSM at 5–10 cm resolution, and a hyperspectral datacube at 10–50 cm resolution.

[1]  P. Zarco-Tejada,et al.  Fluorescence, temperature and narrow-band indices acquired from a UAV platform for water stress detection using a micro-hyperspectral imager and a thermal camera , 2012 .

[2]  Daniel Schläpfer,et al.  Geo-atmospheric processing of airborne imaging spectrometry data. Part 1: Parametric orthorectification , 2002 .

[3]  I. Colomina,et al.  Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review , 2014 .

[4]  Matthew O. Anderson,et al.  Radiometric and Geometric Analysis of Hyperspectral Imagery Acquired from an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[5]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  An Automated Technique for Generating Georectified Mosaics from Ultra-High Resolution Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Imagery, Based on Structure from Motion (SfM) Point Clouds , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[6]  Yi Lin,et al.  A low-cost multi-sensoral mobile mapping system and its feasibility for tree measurements , 2010 .

[7]  Alex Pentland,et al.  3D structure from 2D motion , 1999, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[8]  A. Rango,et al.  UAS remote sensing missions for rangeland applications , 2011 .

[9]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  HyperUAS—Imaging Spectroscopy from a Multirotor Unmanned Aircraft System , 2014, J. Field Robotics.

[10]  Michael E. Schaepman,et al.  Estimating canopy water content using hyperspectral remote sensing data , 2010, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[11]  Alfred Stein,et al.  Quantification of the Effects of Land-Cover-Class Spectral Separability on the Accuracy of Markov-Random-Field-Based Superresolution Mapping , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[12]  G. J. Franke,et al.  Crop monitoring using a light-weight hyperspectral mapping system for unmanned aerial vehicles: first results for the 2013 season , 2013 .

[13]  Jan G. P. W. Clevers,et al.  Using Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Data for Retrieving Canopy Chlorophyll and Nitrogen Content , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[14]  Shunlin Liang,et al.  Earth system science related imaging spectroscopy — an assessment , 2009 .