BULC-U: Sharpening Resolution and Improving Accuracy of Land-Use/Land-Cover Classifications in Google Earth Engine

Remote sensing is undergoing a fundamental paradigm shift, in which approaches interpreting one or two images are giving way to a wide array of data-rich applications. These include assessing global forest loss, tracking water resources across Earth’s surface, determining disturbance frequency across decades, and many more. These advances have been greatly facilitated by Google Earth Engine, which provides both image access and a platform for advanced analysis techniques. Within the realm of land-use/land-cover (LULC) classifications, Earth Engine provides the ability to create new classifications and to access major existing data sets that have already been created, particularly at global extents. By overlaying global LULC classifications—the 300-m GlobCover 2009 LULC data set for example—with sharper images like those from Landsat, one can see the promise and limits of these global data sets and platforms to fuse them. Despite the promise in a global classification covering all of the terrestrial surface, GlobCover 2009 may be too coarse for some applications. We asked whether the LULC labeling provided by GlobCover 2009 could be combined with the spatial granularity of the Landsat platform to produce a hybrid classification having the best features of both resources with high accuracy. Here we apply an improvement of the Bayesian Updating of Land Cover (BULC) algorithm that fused unsupervised Landsat classifications to GlobCover 2009, sharpening the result from a 300-m to a 30-m classification. Working with four clear categories in Mato Grosso, Brazil, we refined the resolution of the LULC classification by an order of magnitude while improving the overall accuracy from 69.1 to 97.5%. This “BULC-U” mode, because it uses unsupervised classifications as inputs, demands less region-specific knowledge from analysts and may be significantly easier for non-specialists to use. This technique can provide new information to land managers and others interested in highly accurate classifications at finer scales.

[1]  E. LeDrew,et al.  Remote sensing of aquatic coastal ecosystem processes , 2006 .

[2]  Jan G. P. W. Clevers,et al.  Land use patterns and related carbon losses following deforestation in South America , 2015 .

[3]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  Image Segmentation Methods for Object-based Analysis and Classification , 2004 .

[4]  M. H. Costa,et al.  Effects of large-scale changes in land cover on the discharge of the Tocantins River, Southeastern Amazonia , 2003 .

[5]  David Petit,et al.  Geolocation Assessment of MERIS GlobCover Orthorectified Products , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[6]  Limin Yang,et al.  Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1 km AVHRR data , 2000 .

[7]  A. Yüksel,et al.  Using ASTER Imagery in Land Use/cover Classification of Eastern Mediterranean Landscapes According to CORINE Land Cover Project , 2008, Sensors.

[8]  J. Brodie,et al.  Predicted distribution of the flat-headed cat Prionailurus planiceps (Mammalia: Carnivora: Felidae) on Borneo , 2016 .

[9]  Rob Alkemade,et al.  Consequences of Uncertainty in Global-Scale Land Cover Maps for Mapping Ecosystem Functions: An Analysis of Pollination Efficiency , 2011, Remote. Sens..

[10]  Kerrie A. Wilson,et al.  Restoring degraded tropical forests for carbon and biodiversity , 2014 .

[11]  J. Cardille,et al.  Ecology: Tropical teleconnections , 2010 .

[12]  M. Herold,et al.  Near real-time disturbance detection using satellite image time series , 2012 .

[13]  P. Cardoso,et al.  Species conservation profiles of a random sample of world spiders I: Agelenidae to Filistatidae , 2018, Biodiversity data journal.

[14]  Margaret E. Andrew,et al.  Contemporary Remotely Sensed Data Products Refine Invasive Plants Risk Mapping in Data Poor Regions , 2017, Front. Plant Sci..

[15]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  Free Access to Landsat Imagery , 2008, Science.

[16]  Shengjie Hu,et al.  Global wetlands: Potential distribution, wetland loss, and status. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[17]  Geoffrey H. Ball,et al.  ISODATA, A NOVEL METHOD OF DATA ANALYSIS AND PATTERN CLASSIFICATION , 1965 .

[18]  B. Soares-Filho,et al.  Cracking Brazil's Forest Code , 2014, Science.

[19]  M. Bauer,et al.  Digital change detection in forest ecosystems with remote sensing imagery , 1996 .

[20]  Rick Mueller,et al.  Mapping global cropland and field size , 2015, Global change biology.

[21]  Chandra P. Giri,et al.  Next generation of global land cover characterization, mapping, and monitoring , 2013, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[22]  Bicheron Patrice,et al.  GlobCover - Products Description and Validation Report , 2008 .

[23]  Catharina J.E. Schulp,et al.  Mapping ecosystem functions and services in Eastern Europe using global-scale data sets , 2012 .

[24]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data , 1991 .

[25]  C. Justice,et al.  High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change , 2013, Science.

[26]  H. Tian,et al.  Spatial and temporal patterns of China's cropland during 1990¿2000: An analysis based on Landsat TM data , 2005 .

[27]  Sean Sloan,et al.  Remaining natural vegetation in the global biodiversity hotspots , 2014 .

[28]  R. Houghton,et al.  Tropical forests are a net carbon source based on aboveground measurements of gain and loss , 2017, Science.

[29]  Michael A. Wulder,et al.  Opening the archive: How free data has enabled the science and monitoring promise of Landsat , 2012 .

[30]  E. Lambin,et al.  The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainability , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Jeffrey A. Cardille,et al.  Bayesian updating of land-cover estimates in a data-rich environment , 2016 .

[32]  Matthias Drusch,et al.  Sentinel-2: ESA's Optical High-Resolution Mission for GMES Operational Services , 2012 .

[33]  Mao Ning Tuanmu,et al.  A global 1‐km consensus land‐cover product for biodiversity and ecosystem modelling , 2014 .

[34]  Zhe Zhu,et al.  Change detection using landsat time series: A review of frequencies, preprocessing, algorithms, and applications , 2017 .

[35]  David P. Roy,et al.  A Global Analysis of Sentinel-2A, Sentinel-2B and Landsat-8 Data Revisit Intervals and Implications for Terrestrial Monitoring , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[36]  John A. Richards,et al.  Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis , 1986 .

[37]  R. DeFries,et al.  Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century , 2010 .

[38]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Land cover 2.0 , 2018 .

[39]  Michael Dixon,et al.  Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone , 2017 .

[40]  J. Brawn Implications of Agricultural Development for Tropical Biodiversity , 2017 .