SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR TURBINE BLADE COMPONENTS

A practical Jacobian derivative based methodology is developed for determining sensitivities applicable to the mechanical design of turbine blade components. A domain parameterization approach is adopted to determine semi-analytic sensitivities of isotropic eight-noded (hexahedron) isoparametric finite elements with respect to geometric shape design variables. Shape design variables considered are dovetail skew angle and dovetail offset. General sensitivity equations are derived for the structural responses of displacement, strain, and stress. The present study adopts a parametric solid model of the component and employs an automated hexahedron finite element meshing utility. This enables an integrated seamless solid model (geometry) to finite element (meshed solid) generation whereby the geometric shape design variables are modified. The developed design sensitivities are demonstrated on a generic turbine blade configuration that has multiple cavities and turnarounds. Derived sensitivity information provides useful design guidelines for initial preliminary product design as well as key components that can be adopted for a design optimization procedure.

[1]  S. Chen,et al.  Three-dimensional shape optimization with variational geometry , 1997 .

[2]  Garret N. Vanderplaats,et al.  Numerical Optimization Techniques for Engineering Design: With Applications , 1984 .

[3]  R. B. Haber,et al.  A new variational approach to structural shape design sensitivity analysis , 1987 .

[4]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  An exposition of the material derivative approach for structural shape sensitivity analysis , 1993 .

[5]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Accuracy Analysis of the Semi-Analytical Method for Shape Sensitivity Calculation∗ , 1990 .

[6]  Noboru Kikuchi,et al.  Optimal shape remodelling of linearly elastic plates using finite element methods , 1984 .

[7]  K. Choi,et al.  A study of design velocity field computation for shape optimal design , 1994 .

[8]  H. Saunders Book Reviews : FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS FUNDAMENTALS R.H. Gallagher Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1975) , 1977 .

[9]  Robert B. Haber,et al.  Adjoint sensitivity analysis for nonlinear dynamic thermoelastic systems , 1991 .

[10]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Recent developments in structural sensitivity analysis , 1989 .

[11]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  On the accuracy of shape sensitivity , 1991 .

[12]  Erik Lund,et al.  A Method of “Exact” Numerical Differentiation for Error Elimination in Finite-Element-Based Semi-Analytical Shape Sensitivity Analyses* , 1993 .

[13]  M. Imam Three‐dimensional shape optimization , 1982 .

[14]  M. E. Botkin,et al.  Three-dimensional shape optimization using fully automatic mesh generation , 1992 .

[15]  Daniel A. Tortorelli,et al.  Three-dimensional shape optimization with variational geometry , 1996 .

[16]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Variational principle for shape design sensitivity analysis , 1992 .

[17]  M. E. Botkin,et al.  Shape optimization with multiple loading conditions and mesh refinement , 1990 .

[18]  A. Belegundu,et al.  A shape optimization approach based on natural design variables and shape functions , 1988 .

[19]  Daniel A. Tortorelli,et al.  A systematic approach to shape sensitivity analysis , 1993 .

[20]  K. K. Choi,et al.  Shape design sensitivity analysis of nonlinear structural systems , 1992 .

[21]  Zenon Mróz,et al.  Variational approach by means of adjoint systems to structural optimization and sensitivity analysis—II: Structure shape variation , 1984 .

[22]  Aditi Chattopadhyay,et al.  Improvements in relaminarization characteristics of turbine blades using design optimization , 1996 .