Geographic prioritization of distributing pandemic influenza vaccines

Pandemic influenza is an international public health concern. In light of the persistent threat of H5N1 avian influenza and the recent pandemic of A/H1N1swine influenza outbreak, public health agencies around the globe are continuously revising their preparedness plans. The A/H1N1 pandemic of 2009 demonstrated that influenza activity and severity might vary considerably among age groups and locations, and the distribution of an effective influenza vaccine may be significantly delayed and staggered. Thus, pandemic influenza vaccine distribution policies should be tailored to the demographic and spatial structures of communities. Here, we introduce a bi-criteria decision-making framework for vaccine distribution policies that is based on a geospatial and demographically-structured model of pandemic influenza transmission within and between counties of Arizona in the Unites States. Based on data from the 2009–2010 H1N1 pandemic, the policy predicted to reduce overall attack rate most effectively is prioritizing counties expected to experience the latest epidemic waves (a policy that may be politically untenable). However, when we consider reductions in both the attack rate and the waiting period for those seeking vaccines, the widely adopted pro rata policy (distributing according to population size) is also predicted to be an effective strategy.

[1]  M. Kretzschmar,et al.  Using data on social contacts to estimate age-specific transmission parameters for respiratory-spread infectious agents. , 2006, American journal of epidemiology.

[2]  Raffaele Vardavas,et al.  Can Influenza Epidemics Be Prevented by Voluntary Vaccination? , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[3]  Shweta Bansal,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Influenza Vaccination Programs , 2006, PLoS medicine.

[4]  A. Flahault,et al.  Estimating the impact of school closure on influenza transmission from Sentinel data , 2008, Nature.

[5]  J. Hyman,et al.  Transmission Dynamics of the Great Influenza Pandemic of 1918 in Geneva, Switzerland: Assessing the Effects of Hypothetical Interventions , 2022 .

[6]  Alison P Galvani,et al.  The dynamics of risk perceptions and precautionary behavior in response to 2009 (H1N1) pandemic influenza , 2010, BMC infectious diseases.

[7]  G. Glass,et al.  Assessing the impact of airline travel on the geographic spread of pandemic influenza , 2003 .

[8]  Tara Kirk Sell,et al.  Mass vaccination for the 2009 H1N1 pandemic: approaches, challenges, and recommendations. , 2010, Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science.

[9]  Timothy C. Reluga,et al.  Long-standing influenza vaccination policy is in accord with individual self-interest but not with the utilitarian optimum , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  C. Furlanello,et al.  Mitigation Measures for Pandemic Influenza in Italy: An Individual Based Model Considering Different Scenarios , 2008, PloS one.

[11]  P. Kaye.  Infectious diseases of humans: Dynamics and control , 1993 .

[12]  M. Lipsitch,et al.  The Severity of Pandemic H1N1 Influenza in the United States, from April to July 2009: A Bayesian Analysis , 2009, PLoS medicine.

[13]  J. Medlock,et al.  Optimizing Influenza Vaccine Distribution , 2009, Science.

[14]  Nina H. Fefferman,et al.  Pandemic Preparedness Strategies for School Systems: Is Closure Really the Only Way? , 2008 .

[15]  Nathaniel Hupert,et al.  Optimizing Tactics for use of the U.S. Antiviral Strategic National Stockpile for Pandemic (H1N1) Influenza, 2009 , 2009, PLoS currents.

[16]  Nathaniel Hupert,et al.  Optimizing Tactics for Use of the U.S. Antiviral Strategic National Stockpile for Pandemic Influenza , 2011, PloS one.

[17]  Piero Poletti,et al.  Coinfection can trigger multiple pandemic waves , 2008, Journal of Theoretical Biology.

[18]  Gerardo Chowell,et al.  Adaptive Vaccination Strategies to Mitigate Pandemic Influenza: Mexico as a Case Study , 2009, PloS one.

[19]  Jacco Wallinga,et al.  Optimal allocation of pandemic influenza vaccine depends on age, risk and timing. , 2008, Vaccine.

[20]  D L Zalkind,et al.  A Decision Analysis Approach to the Swine Influenza Vaccination Decision for an Individual , 1980, Medical care.

[21]  J. H. Ellis,et al.  Erratum: Assessing the Impact of Airline Travel on the Geographic Spread of Pandemic Influenza , 2004, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[22]  L. A. Rvachev,et al.  A mathematical model for the global spread of influenza , 1985 .

[23]  E. Lyons,et al.  Pandemic Potential of a Strain of Influenza A (H1N1): Early Findings , 2009, Science.

[24]  D. Cummings,et al.  Strategies for containing an emerging influenza pandemic in Southeast Asia , 2005, Nature.

[25]  G. Cilla,et al.  Residual immunity in older people against the influenza A(H1N1)--recent experience in northern Spain. , 2009, Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin.

[26]  Jan Medlock,et al.  Optimizing allocation for a delayed influenza vaccination campaign , 2009, PLoS currents.

[27]  C. Bauch,et al.  Modelling mitigation strategies for pandemic (H1N1) 2009 , 2009, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[28]  D. Cummings,et al.  Strategies for mitigating an influenza pandemic , 2006, Nature.

[29]  C. Macken,et al.  Mitigation strategies for pandemic influenza in the United States. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  M. Keeling,et al.  Modeling Infectious Diseases in Humans and Animals , 2007 .

[31]  Moshe Kress,et al.  Policies for biodefense revisited: The prioritized vaccination process for smallpox , 2003, Ann. Oper. Res..

[32]  Phillip D. Stroud,et al.  Pandemic simulation of antivirals + school closures: buying time until strain-specific vaccine is available , 2008, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.