Experimental evidence for real-time song frequency shift in response to urban noise in a passerine bird

Research has shown that bird songs are modified in different ways to deal with urban noise and promote signal transmission through noisy environments. Urban noise is composed of low frequencies, thus the observation that songs have a higher minimum frequency in noisy places suggests this is a way of avoiding noise masking. Most studies are correlative and there is as yet little experimental evidence that this is a short-term mechanism owing to individual plasticity. Here we experimentally test if house finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) can modulate the minimum frequency of their songs in response to different noise levels. We exposed singing males to three continuous treatments: low–high–low noise levels. We found a significant increase in minimum frequency from low to high and a decrement from high to low treatments. We also found that this was mostly achieved by modifying the frequency of the same low-frequency syllable types used in the different treatments. When different low-frequency syllables were used, those sung during the noisy condition were longer than the ones sang during the quiet condition. We conclude that house finches modify their songs in several ways in response to urban noise, thus providing evidence of a short-term acoustic adaptation.

[1]  David A. Luther,et al.  Urban noise and the cultural evolution of bird songs , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  H. Brumm,et al.  Blackbirds sing higher-pitched songs in cities: adaptation to habitat acoustics or side-effect of urbanization? , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  K. Gaston,et al.  Daytime noise predicts nocturnal singing in urban robins , 2007, Biology Letters.

[4]  M. Brainard,et al.  Performance variability enables adaptive plasticity of ‘crystallized’ adult birdsong , 2007, Nature.

[5]  J. Cynx,et al.  Amplitude regulation of vocalizations in noise by a songbird,Taeniopygia guttata , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Fluid dynamics: Vortex rings in a constant electric field , 2003, Nature.

[7]  P. Slater,et al.  Ambient noise, motor fatigue, and serial redundancy in chaffinch song , 2006, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[8]  P. Tzallas,et al.  Direct observation of attosecond light bunching , 2003, Nature.

[9]  Esteban Fernández-Juricic,et al.  Microhabitat Selection and Singing Behavior Patterns of Male House Finches ( Carpodacus mexicanus ) in Urban Parks in a Heavily Urbanized Landscape in the Western U . S . * , 2006 .

[10]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  HABITAT-DEPENDENT SONG DIVERGENCE IN THE LITTLE GREENBUL: AN ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SELECTION PRESSURES ON ACOUSTIC SIGNALS , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  Dietmar Todt,et al.  Noise-dependent song amplitude regulation in a territorial songbird , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  A. A. Ríos-Chelén,et al.  Strategies of song adaptation to urban noise in the house finch: syllable pitch plasticity or differential syllable use? , 2009 .

[13]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Cities Change the Songs of Birds , 2006, Current Biology.

[14]  Kazuo Okanoya,et al.  Context-dependent song amplitude control in Bengalese finches , 2003, Neuroreport.

[15]  Wouter Halfwerk,et al.  A behavioural mechanism explaining noise-dependent frequency use in urban birdsong , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  Gail L. Patricelli,et al.  AVIAN COMMUNICATION IN URBAN NOISE: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF VOCAL ADJUSTMENT , 2006 .

[17]  H. Brumm,et al.  Acoustic Communication in Noise , 2005 .

[18]  D. Todt,et al.  Acoustic communication in noise: regulation of call characteristics in a New World monkey , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[19]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Habitat-related birdsong divergence: a multi-level study on the influence of territory density and ambient noise in European blackbirds , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.