Toward image guided robotic surgery: system validation.

PURPOSE Navigation for current robotic assisted surgical techniques is primarily accomplished through a stereo pair of laparoscopic camera images. These images provide standard optical visualization of the surface but provide no subsurface information. Image guidance methods allow the visualization of subsurface information to determine the current position in relationship to that of tracked tools. MATERIALS AND METHODS A robotic image guided surgical system was designed and implemented based on our previous laboratory studies. A series of experiments using tissue mimicking phantoms with injected target lesions was performed. The surgeon was asked to resect "tumor" tissue with and without the augmentation of image guidance using the da Vinci robotic surgical system. Resections were performed and compared to an ideal resection based on the radius of the tumor measured from preoperative computerized tomography. A quantity called the resection ratio, that is the ratio of resected tissue compared to the ideal resection, was calculated for each of 13 trials and compared. RESULTS The mean +/- SD resection ratio of procedures augmented with image guidance was smaller than that of procedures without image guidance (3.26 +/- 1.38 vs 9.01 +/- 1.81, p <0.01). Additionally, procedures using image guidance were shorter (average 8 vs 13 minutes). CONCLUSIONS It was demonstrated that there is a benefit from the augmentation of laparoscopic video with updated preoperative images. Incorporating our image guided system into the da Vinci robotic system improved overall tissue resection, as measured by our metric. Adding image guidance to the da Vinci robotic surgery system may result in the potential for improvements such as the decreased removal of benign tissue while maintaining an appropriate surgical margin.

[1]  J. Binder,et al.  Robotically‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy , 2001, BJU international.

[2]  Osamu Miyake,et al.  Urological robotic surgery: Preliminary experience with the Zeus system , 2005, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[3]  M. Carini,et al.  Nephron-sparing surgery: current developments and controversies. , 2007, European urology.

[4]  Li-Ming Su,et al.  Laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy--critical analysis of the results. , 2006, European urology.

[5]  S. Herrell Toward image-guided robotic surgery: Determining intrinsic accuracy of the da Vinci robot , 2007 .

[6]  Open radical retropubic prostatectomy. , 2007, Urologic oncology.

[7]  L. Kavoussi,et al.  Telerobotic assisted laparoscopic surgery: initial laboratory and clinical experience. , 1994, Urology.

[8]  LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY , 1999 .

[9]  M. Menon,et al.  da Vinci-assisted robotic partial nephrectomy: technique and results at a mean of 15 months of follow-up. , 2007, European urology.

[10]  M. Stifelman,et al.  Robot assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial experience. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[11]  X. Cathelineau,et al.  Robotic radical prostatectomy: the European experience. , 2004, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[12]  T. Peters Image-guidance for surgical procedures , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  S. Herrell,et al.  A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[14]  T. Ahlering,et al.  Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[15]  Adrian Lobontiu,et al.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the extraperitoneal approach using the da Vinci robotic system. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[16]  Ashutosh Tewari,et al.  Robotic prostatectomy: a review of outcomes compared with laparoscopic and open approaches. , 2008, Urology.

[17]  Robert G. Moore,et al.  Telerobotic assisted laparoscopicsurgery: Initial laboratory and clinical experience* , 1994 .

[18]  S. Duke Herrell,et al.  Update: Toward image-guided robotic surgery: determining the intrinsic accuracy of the daVinci-S robot , 2007, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[19]  Prokar Dasgupta,et al.  Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Benign Urological Conditions , 2006, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[20]  S Duke Herrell,et al.  Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy. , 2005, Urology.

[21]  Mani Menon,et al.  Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy: experience in more than 1000 cases. , 2004, Journal of endourology.

[22]  S. Duke Herrell,et al.  Towards image guided robotic surgery: multi-arm tracking through hybrid localization , 2009, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[23]  Dan Stoianovici,et al.  Robotic prostate surgery , 2006, Expert review of medical devices.

[24]  J. Binder,et al.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Frankfurt technique , 2003, World Journal of Urology.

[25]  Vipul R Patel,et al.  Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting--the learning curve and beyond: initial 200 cases. , 2005, The Journal of urology.