Interfacing the Environment: Networked Screens and the Ethics of Visual Consumption

The screen continues to be the primary generator of visual imagery in contemporary culture, including of the natural world. This paper examines the screen as visual interface in the construction and consumption of physical environments. Screens are increasingly incorporated in our daily habits and imbricated into our lives, especially as mediating technologies are embedded into the surfaces of our physical surroundings, shaping and molding our interactions with and perceptions of those environments. As screens become increasingly portable and digitized, they further modify our relationships with environments, projecting multiple images and imagery which fracture and layer visual consumption. And as screens become ubiquitous in urban environments, they network into maps of information control and consumption. We need to fully understand these processes of screen-mediated representation and interaction in order to be able to comment on the ethics of contemporary practices of visually consuming physical environments. In particular, the paper will argue that processes of consumption and their interaction with visual interfacing technologies are not simple or straight-forward, but nevertheless pose ethical questions about the relationship between visual and material circuits of consumption.

[1]  Fiona Robinson,et al.  Globalizing Care: Ethics, Feminist Theory, and International Relations , 1997 .

[2]  Scott Lash,et al.  Technological Forms of Life , 2001 .

[3]  O. Moen,et al.  The Stadium and the City , 1995 .

[4]  J. Urry The Tourist Gaze: Leisure and Travel in Contemporary Societies , 1990 .

[5]  D. Morley Family Television: Cultural Power and Domestic Leisure , 1986 .

[6]  David Lyon,et al.  The Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society , 1994 .

[7]  J. Wise,et al.  Exploring Technology and Social Space , 1997 .

[8]  Todd May The Moral Theory of Poststructuralism , 1995 .

[9]  E. Strain Public Places, Private Journeys: Ethnography, Entertainment, and the Tourist Gaze , 2003 .

[10]  J. Bolter,et al.  Remediation: Understanding New Media , 1999 .

[11]  Douglas Thomas Hacker Culture , 2002 .

[12]  Lynn Spigel Make room for TV , 1992 .

[13]  Jeff Lewis Nature, Media, Government , 1997 .

[14]  M. Heidegger The Age of the World Picture , 1977 .

[15]  L. Spigel Make room for TV : television and the family ideal in postwar America , 1993 .

[16]  Arild Fetveit Reality TV in the digital era: a paradox in visual culture? , 1999 .

[17]  K. Heller,et al.  Deleuze And Guattari: New Mappings in Politics, Philosophy, and Culture , 1998 .

[18]  Celia Lury,et al.  THE OBJECTS OF TRAVEL , 2002 .

[19]  Ien Ang,et al.  Living room wars : rethinking media audiences for a postmodern world , 1996 .

[20]  M. Heidegger The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays , 1977 .

[21]  G. Rochlin Trapped in the Net , 1997 .

[22]  Chris Rojek,et al.  Touring Cultures: Transformations of Travel and Theory , 2002 .

[23]  M. Crick Representations of International Tourism in the Social Sciences: Sun, Sex, Sights, Savings, and Servility , 1989 .

[24]  Samuel Weber,et al.  Mass Mediauras: Form, Technics, Media , 1996 .

[25]  Kirsty Best,et al.  The electronic polis: Media democracy and the invasion of Iraq , 2003 .

[26]  William E. Connolly,et al.  Why I Am Not A Secularist , 1999 .

[27]  Helen Baehr,et al.  Boxed in: Women and Television , 1987 .

[28]  G. Deleuze,et al.  Spinoza: Practical Philosophy , 1970 .

[29]  J. Baudrillard The ecstasy of communication , 1988 .