Asymmetric effect of political stability on production-based CO2 emissions in the UK: long-run evidence from nonlinear ARDL and frequency domain causality

[1]  M. Kartal,et al.  Asymmetric and long-run impact of political stability on consumption-based carbon dioxide emissions in Finland: Evidence from nonlinear and Fourier-based approaches. , 2022, Journal of environmental management.

[2]  I. Ozturk,et al.  On the criticality of renewable energy to sustainable development: Do green financial development, technological innovation, and economic complexity matter for China? , 2022, Renewable Energy.

[3]  I. Ozturk,et al.  Facilitating renewable energy transition, ecological innovations and stringent environmental policies to improve ecological sustainability: Evidence from MM-QR method , 2022, Renewable Energy.

[4]  F. Ayhan,et al.  Impact of renewable and fossil fuel energy consumption on environmental degradation: evidence from USA by nonlinear approaches , 2022, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology.

[5]  J. Oláh,et al.  A Path Towards Green Revolution: How do Environmental Technologies, Political Risk, and Environmental Taxes Influence Green Energy Consumption? , 2022, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[6]  M. Kartal,et al.  Retesting the Influences on CO2 Emissions in China: Evidence From Dynamic ARDL Approach , 2022, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[7]  T. Adebayo.  Renewable Energy Consumption and Environmental Sustainability in Canada: Does Political Stability Make a Difference? , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[8]  T. Adebayo,et al.  Does political risk spur environmental issues in China? , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[9]  T. Adebayo,et al.  Does political risk drive environmental degradation in BRICS countries? Evidence from method of moments quantile regression , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[10]  T. Adebayo,et al.  Role of technological innovation and globalization in BRICS economies: policy towards environmental sustainability , 2022, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology.

[11]  Ugur Korkut Pata,et al.  Analyzing the role of income inequality and political stability in environmental degradation: Evidence from South Asia , 2022, Gondwana Research.

[12]  Manzoor Ahmad,et al.  The cyclical impact of innovation in green and sustainable technologies on carbon dioxide emissions in OECD economies , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[13]  M. Kartal,et al.  The role of data frequency and method selection in electricity price estimation: Comparative evidence from Turkey in pre-pandemic and pandemic periods , 2022, Renewable Energy.

[14]  S. Kamel,et al.  Drivers of environmental degradation in Turkey: Designing an SDG framework through advanced quantile approaches , 2022, Energy Reports.

[15]  Mustafa Tevfik Kartal.  The role of consumption of energy, fossil sources, nuclear energy, and renewable energy on environmental degradation in top-five carbon producing countries , 2021, Renewable Energy.

[16]  I. Ozturk,et al.  On the asymmetric effects of financial deepening on renewable and non-renewable energy consumption: insights from China , 2021, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja.

[17]  Husam Rjoub,et al.  Wavelet analysis of impact of renewable energy consumption and technological innovation on CO2 emissions: evidence from Portugal , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[18]  S. I. Khattak,et al.  On the goals of sustainable production and the conditions of environmental sustainability: Does cyclical innovation in green and sustainable technologies determine carbon dioxide emissions in G-7 economies , 2021, Sustainable Production and Consumption.

[19]  Manzoor Ahmad,et al.  Do innovation in environmental-related technologies asymmetrically affect carbon dioxide emissions in the United States? , 2021, Technology in Society.

[20]  Manzoor Ahmad,et al.  Do innovation in environmental-related technologies cyclically and asymmetrically affect environmental sustainability in BRICS nations? , 2021, Technology in Society.

[21]  Manzoor Ahmad,et al.  Do international collaborations in environmental-related technology development in the U.S. pay off in combating carbon dioxide emissions? Role of domestic environmental innovation, renewable energy consumption, and trade openness , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[22]  Muhammad Tariq Majeed,et al.  Environmental costs of political instability in Pakistan: policy options for clean energy consumption and environment , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[23]  Avik Sinha,et al.  The nexus between urbanization, renewable energy consumption, financial development, and CO2 emissions: evidence from selected Asian countries , 2021, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[24]  T. Adebayo,et al.  Role of political risk to achieve carbon neutrality: Evidence from Brazil. , 2021, Journal of environmental management.

[25]  Zeeshan Fareed,et al.  Role of trade openness, export diversification, and renewable electricity output in realizing carbon neutrality dream of China. , 2021, Journal of environmental management.

[26]  Husam Rjoub,et al.  The asymmetric effects of renewable energy consumption and trade openness on carbon emissions in Sweden: new evidence from quantile-on-quantile regression approach , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[27]  A. Rehman,et al.  A pathway toward future sustainability: Assessing the influence of innovation shocks on CO2 emissions in developing economies , 2021, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[28]  Jiangbo Wang,et al.  How to peak carbon emissions of provincial construction industry? Scenario analysis of Jiangsu Province , 2021, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[29]  Sahar Afshan,et al.  Disaggregated renewable energy sources in mitigating CO2 emissions: new evidence from the USA using quantile regressions , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[30]  M. Balcilar,et al.  Is causality between globalization and energy consumption bidirectional or unidirectional in top and bottom globalized economies? , 2021 .

[31]  X. Yao,et al.  Carbon intensity reduction assessment of renewable energy technology innovation in China: A panel data model with cross-section dependence and slope heterogeneity , 2021 .

[32]  Delin Huang,et al.  Economic Development, Globalization, Political Risk and CO2 Emission: The Case of Vietnam , 2020, The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business.

[33]  S. Koc,et al.  Testing validity of the EKC hypothesis in South Korea: role of renewable energy and trade openness , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[34]  Cem Işık,et al.  Testing the EKC hypothesis for ten US states: an application of heterogeneous panel estimation method , 2019, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[35]  U. Pata.  The influence of coal and noncarbohydrate energy consumption on CO2 emissions: Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Turkey , 2018, Energy.

[36]  S. Hammoudeh,et al.  Does Globalisation Worsen Environmental Quality in Developed Economies? , 2018, Environmental Modeling & Assessment.

[37]  Perry Sadorsky,et al.  How strong is the causal relationship between globalization and energy consumption in developed economies? A country-specific time-series and panel analysis , 2018 .

[38]  Piyali Banerjee,et al.  Fourier ADL cointegration test to approximate smooth breaks with new evidence from Crude Oil Market , 2017 .

[39]  I. Kyritsis,et al.  The dynamic linkages between economic growth, environmental quality and health in Greece , 2016 .

[40]  Y. Shin,et al.  Modelling Asymmetric Cointegration and Dynamic Multipliers in a Nonlinear ARDL Framework , 2013 .

[41]  Azmat Gani,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GOOD GOVERNANCE AND CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS: EVIDENCE FROM DEVELOPING ECONOMIES , 2012 .

[42]  Jörg Breitung,et al.  Testing for short- and long-run causality: A frequency-domain approach , 2006 .

[43]  Mark C. Strazicich,et al.  Minimum Lagrange Multiplier Unit Root Test with Two Structural Breaks , 2003, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[44]  Richard J. Smith,et al.  Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships , 2001 .

[45]  B. LeBaron,et al.  A test for independence based on the correlation dimension , 1996 .

[46]  Yongcheol Shin,et al.  An Autoregressive Distributed Lag Modelling Approach to Cointegration Analysis , 1995 .

[47]  Peter C. B. Phillips,et al.  Statistical Inference in Instrumental Variables Regression with I(1) Processes , 1990 .

[48]  Clinton Scoltard.  The Pathway , 1899 .