Two-dimensional chemotherapy simulations demonstrate fundamental transport and tumor response limitations involving nanoparticles.

Zheng et al. (2004) developed a multiscale, two-dimensional tumor simulator with the capability of showing tumoral lesion progression through the stages of diffusion-limited dormancy, neo-vascularization (angiogenesis) and consequent rapid growth and tissue invasion. In this paper we extend their simulator to describe delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs to a highly perfused tumoral lesion and the tumor cells' response to the therapy. We perform 2-D simulations based on a self-consistent parameter estimation that demonstrate fundamental convective and diffusive transport limitations in delivering anticancer drug into tumors, whether this delivery is via free drug administration (e.g., intravenous drip), or via 100 nm nanoparticles injected into the bloodstream, extravasating and releasing the drug that then diffuses into the tumoral tissue, or via smaller 1-10 nm nanoparticles that are capable of diffusing directly and targeting the individual tumor cell. Even in a best-case scenario involving: constant ("smart") drug release from the nanoparticles; a homogenous tumor of one cell type, which is drug-sensitive and does not develop resistance; targeted nanoparticle delivery, with resulting low host tissue toxicity; and for model parameters calibrated to ensure sufficient drug or nanoparticle blood concentration to rapidly kill all cells in vitro ; our analysis shows that fundamental transport limitations are severe and that drug levels inside the tumor are far less than in vitro , leaving large parts of the tumor with inadequate drug concentration. A comparison of cell death rates predicted by our simulations reveals that the in vivo rate of tumor shrinkage is several orders of magnitude less than in vitro for equal chemotherapeutic carrier concentrations in the blood serum and in vitro, and after some shrinkage the tumor may achieve a new mass equilibrium far above detectable levels. We also demonstrate that adjuvant anti-angiogenic therapy "normalizing" the vasculature may ameliorate transport limitations, although leading to unwanted tumor fragmentation. Finally, our results suggest that small nanoparticles equipped with active transport mechanisms (e.g., chemotaxis) would overcome the predicted limitations and result in improved tumor response.

[1]  H M Byrne,et al.  Growth of nonnecrotic tumors in the presence and absence of inhibitors. , 1995, Mathematical biosciences.

[2]  H. Lenz Antiangiogenic Agents in Cancer Therapy , 2005, Cancer Drug Discovery and Development.

[3]  V. Cristini,et al.  Nonlinear simulation of tumor necrosis, neo-vascularization and tissue invasion via an adaptive finite-element/level-set method , 2005, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[4]  G. Truskey,et al.  Transport phenomena in biological systems , 2004 .

[5]  K. Hirschi,et al.  Nutrient regulation of cell cycle progression. , 2004, Annual review of nutrition.

[6]  R K Jain,et al.  Determinants of tumor blood flow: a review. , 1988, Cancer research.

[7]  Shu Chien,et al.  Chemotherapeutic engineering: Application and further development of chemical engineering principles for chemotherapy of cancer and other diseases , 2003 .

[8]  M E Fisher,et al.  A mathematical model of cancer chemotherapy with an optimal selection of parameters. , 1990, Mathematical biosciences.

[9]  M. Chaplain,et al.  Free boundary value problems associated with the growth and development of multicellular spheroids , 1997, European Journal of Applied Mathematics.

[10]  I. Fichtner,et al.  Influence of polybutylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles and liposomes on the efficacy and toxicity of the anticancer drug mitoxantrone in murine tumour models. , 1993, Journal of microencapsulation.

[11]  R K Jain,et al.  Delivery of molecular medicine to solid tumors: lessons from in vivo imaging of gene expression and function. , 2001, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[12]  Malisa Sarntinoranont,et al.  Interstitial Stress and Fluid Pressure Within a Growing Tumor , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Carlo Giussani,et al.  Combinatorial Administration of Molecules That Simultaneously Inhibit Angiogenesis and Invasion Leads to Increased Therapeutic Efficacy in Mouse Models of Malignant Glioma , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[14]  Vittorio Cristini,et al.  Two-Dimensional Chemotherapy Simulations Demonstrate Fundamental Transport and Tumor Response Limitations Involving Nanoparticles , 2004 .

[15]  Vittorio Cristini,et al.  An adaptive mesh algorithm for evolving surfaces: simulation of drop breakup and coalescence , 2001 .

[16]  M. Westphal,et al.  Invasion as limitation to anti-angiogenic glioma therapy. , 2003, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement.

[17]  M. Chaplain,et al.  Continuous and discrete mathematical models of tumor-induced angiogenesis , 1998, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[18]  M. Westphal,et al.  Inhibition of glioma angiogenesis and growth in vivo by systemic treatment with a monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2. , 2001, Cancer research.

[19]  Rakesh K. Jain,et al.  Transport of molecules across tumor vasculature , 2004, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[20]  S. McDougall,et al.  Mathematical modelling of flow through vascular networks: Implications for tumour-induced angiogenesis and chemotherapy strategies , 2002, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[21]  Rakesh K. Jain,et al.  Normalizing tumor vasculature with anti-angiogenic therapy: A new paradigm for combination therapy , 2001, Nature Medicine.

[22]  P. Kleihues,et al.  Cytologic composition of the untreated glioblastoma with implications for evaluation of needle biopsies , 1989, Cancer.

[23]  R. DePinho,et al.  Malignant glioma: genetics and biology of a grave matter. , 2001, Genes & development.

[24]  R. Jain,et al.  Regulation of transport pathways in tumor vessels: role of tumor type and microenvironment. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  M. Chaplain Avascular growth, angiogenesis and vascular growth in solid tumours: The mathematical modelling of the stages of tumour development , 1996 .

[26]  J. Li,et al.  The delivery of BCNU to brain tumors. , 1999, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[27]  Rakesh K. Jain,et al.  Pathology: Cancer cells compress intratumour vessels , 2004, Nature.

[28]  R K Jain,et al.  Physiological barriers to delivery of monoclonal antibodies and other macromolecules in tumors. , 1990, Cancer research.

[29]  M. A. Khan,et al.  Evaluation of carrier capacity and release characteristics for poly( butyl 2-cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles , 1986 .

[30]  V. Cristini,et al.  Nonlinear simulation of tumor growth , 2003, Journal of mathematical biology.

[31]  J. Kreuter,et al.  Comparative study on the cytostatic effects and the tissue distribution of 5-fluorouracil in a free form and bound to polybutylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles in sarcoma 180-bearing mice. , 1983, Oncology.