Description of an individual patient methodology for calculating the cost-effectiveness of treatments for osteoporosis in women

Models of the cost-effectiveness of pharmaceutical interventions for the treatment of osteoporosis have traditionally adopted cohort-based approaches. We present a transition-state model to simulate the experience of individual patients, allowing the full patient history and residential status to influence the probabilities of future fractures at the hip, spine, wrist or proximal humerus. Alongside epidemiological data, we used systematic literature reviews of costs, utilities and efficacy to populate the model for a UK setting. We established a statistical relationship between the inputs and outputs of the individual patient model creating a near instantaneous emulation of the individual patient model. We undertook extensive sensitivity analyses to analyse the uncertainty in the estimated incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year due to uncertainty in the efficacy of the drugs. We provide illustrative results accompanied by individual and multi-interventional cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.

[1]  A H Briggs,et al.  Handling uncertainty when performing economic evaluation of healthcare interventions. , 1999, Health technology assessment.

[2]  J. Kanis,et al.  An Update on the Diagnosis and Assessment of Osteoporosis with Densitometry , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[3]  M. Weinstein,et al.  Foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis for health and medical practices. , 1977, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  J A Kanis,et al.  Treatment of established osteoporosis: a systematic review and cost-utility analysis. , 2002, Health technology assessment.

[5]  D. Torgerson,et al.  The Cost of Treating Osteoporotic Fractures in the United Kingdom Female Population , 1998, Osteoporosis International.

[6]  C. Cooper,et al.  Health‐Related Quality of Life in Postmenopausal Women With Low BMD With or Without Prevalent Vertebral Fractures , 2000, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[7]  S. Wilson Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes , 1987 .

[8]  T. Abbott,et al.  Patients with Prior Fractures Have an Increased Risk of Future Fractures: A Summary of the Literature and Statistical Synthesis , 2000, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[9]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Consensus Development Conference , 1984 .

[10]  M D Stevenson,et al.  Gaussian Process Modeling in Conjunction with Individual Patient Simulation Modeling: A Case Study Describing the Calculation of Cost-Effectiveness Ratios for the Treatment of Established Osteoporosis , 2004, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[11]  D. Torgerson,et al.  Health-Related Quality of Life of Colles’ Fracture Patients , 1999, Osteoporosis International.

[12]  A Gafni,et al.  Cost effectiveness/utility analyses. Do current decision rules lead us to where we want to be? , 1992, Journal of health economics.

[13]  O. Johnell,et al.  The risk and burden of vertebral fractures in Sweden , 2004, Osteoporosis International.

[14]  A. Zbrozek,et al.  Model of Complications of NIDDM: I. Model construction and assumptions , 1997, Diabetes Care.

[15]  L. Curtis,et al.  Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2016 , 2015 .

[16]  R. J. Harman,et al.  National Institute for clinical excellence preoperative tests: Is the consensus hard to get?: 1AP3-9 , 2007 .

[17]  Osteoporosis: review of the evidence for prevention, diagnosis and treatment and cost-effectiveness analysis. Introduction. , 1998, Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA.

[18]  H. Kopera,et al.  Briefe an die Redaktion , 1989, Klinische Wochenschrift.

[19]  J Raftery,et al.  NICE: faster access to modern treatments? Analysis of guidance on health technologies , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  A A Stinnett,et al.  Estimating CE Ratios under Second-order Uncertainty , 1997, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[21]  Grazyna Adamiak,et al.  Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes, 3rd ed , 2006 .

[22]  M. Sculpher,et al.  Representing uncertainty: the role of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. , 2001, Health economics.