Technology Transfer across Organizational Boundaries: Absorptive Capacity and Desorptive Capacity

In light of the trend towards open innovation, interorganizational technology transfer by means of alliances and licensing has often become a key component of open innovation processes. Inbound open innovation describes inward technology transfer, whereas outbound open innovation refers to outward technology transfer. Traditionally, inward technology transfer has received considerable attention because most practitioners and academics focus on the technology recipient's absorptive capacity. In contrast, the role of the technology source has been relatively neglected. This article addresses the concept of desorptive capacity, which refers to a firm's ability to identify technology transfer opportunities and to transfer technology to the recipient. The notion of market knowledge in the concept of desorptive capacity deepens our understanding of many firms' managerial difficulties in implementing active technology transfer strategies. Thus, desorptive capacity enriches our understanding of the dynamics of outward technology transfer. It provides new insights into the success or failure of interorganizational technology transactions.

[1]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  How open innovation can help you cope in lean times. , 2009 .

[2]  O. Gassmann,et al.  The Future of Open Innovation , 2010 .

[3]  D. Sjödin,et al.  Open Innovation and the Stage-Gate Process: A Revised Model for New Product Development , 2010 .

[4]  Fiat: Open Innovation in a Downturn , 2010 .

[5]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Absorbing the Concept of Absorptive Capacity: How to Realize Its Potential in the Organization Field , 2009 .

[6]  U. Lichtenthaler,et al.  A Capability-Based Framework for Open Innovation: Complementing Absorptive Capacity , 2009 .

[7]  Z. Zhao,et al.  A multilevel perspective on knowledge transfer: evidence from the Chinese automotive industry , 2009 .

[8]  Ammon Salter,et al.  Does IP strategy have to cripple open innovation , 2009 .

[9]  U. Lichtenthaler.  Absorptive Capacity, Environmental Turbulence, and the Complementarity of Organizational Learning Processes , 2009 .

[10]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  RETRACTION NOTICE: Technology licensing strategies: the interaction of process and content characteristics , 2009 .

[11]  H. Ernst,et al.  Intermediary Services in the Markets for Technology: Organizational Antecedents and Performance Consequences , 2008 .

[12]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Inter- and Intra-Organizational Knowledge Transfer: A Meta-Analytic Review and Assessment of its Antecedents and Consequences , 2008 .

[13]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Inter-Organizational Knowledge Transfer: Current Themes and Future Prospects , 2008 .

[14]  H. Ernst,et al.  Innovation Intermediaries: Why Internet Marketplaces for Technology Have Not Yet Met the Expectations , 2008 .

[15]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  Open Innovation in Practice: An Analysis of Strategic Approaches to Technology Transactions , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[16]  Lee N. Davis,et al.  Licensing Strategies of the New “Intellectual Property Vendors” , 2008 .

[17]  D. Teece,et al.  How to Capture Value from Innovation: Shaping Intellectual Property and Industry Architecture , 2007 .

[18]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  The Drivers of Technology Licensing: An Industry Comparison , 2007 .

[19]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  The Market for Innovation: Implications for Corporate Strategy , 2007 .

[20]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Dynamic capabilities : understanding strategic change in organizations , 2007 .

[21]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[22]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks : Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance , 2007 .

[23]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct , 2006 .

[24]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  Attitudes to Externally Organising Knowledge Management Tasks: A Review, Reconsideration and Extension of the NIH Syndrome , 2006 .

[25]  J. Howells.  Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation , 2006 .

[26]  Andrea Fosfuri.  The Licensing Dilemma: Understanding the Determinants of the Rate of Technology Licensing , 2006 .

[27]  A. Gambardella,et al.  The Market for Patents in Europe , 2006 .

[28]  S. Winter,et al.  The Co-evolution of Capabilities and Transaction Costs: Explaining the Institutional Structure of Production , 2005 .

[29]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Managing Potential and Realized Absorptive Capacity: How Do Organizational Antecedents Matter? , 2005 .

[30]  David J. Teece,et al.  Royalties, evolving patent rights, and the value of innovation , 2004 .

[31]  Jean-Philippe Escher.  Design and implementation of technology marketing organizations , 2003 .

[32]  A. Arora,et al.  Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy , 2002 .

[33]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[34]  Julie L Davis,et al.  Edison in the Boardroom: How Leading Companies Realize Value from Their Intellectual Assets , 2001 .

[35]  S. Park,et al.  Interfirm Rivalry and Managerial Complexity: A Conceptual Framework of Alliance Failure , 2001 .

[36]  S. Koruna,et al.  External technology commercialization: policy guidelines , 2001, PICMET '01. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol.1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37199).

[37]  P. Norling,et al.  Research/Technology Management , 2000 .

[38]  Christian Belz,et al.  Technology marketing: a new core competence of technology-intensive enterprises , 2000, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[39]  David Kline,et al.  Rembrandts in the Attic: Unlocking the Hidden Value of Patents , 1999 .

[40]  Bernard L. Simonin.  Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances , 1999 .

[41]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[42]  D. Teece.  Capturing Value from Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets for Know-How, and Intangible Assets , 1998 .

[43]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[44]  D. Teece,et al.  Managing Intellectual Capital: Licensing and Cross-Licensing in Semiconductors and Electronics , 1997 .

[45]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[46]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[47]  D. Teece,et al.  The Multinational Corporation and the Resource Cost of International Technology Transfer. , 1978 .