Transforum system innovation towards sustainable food. A review

Innovations in the agri-food sector are needed to create a sustainable food supply. Sustainable food supply requires unexpectedly that densely populated regions remain food producers. A Dutch innovation program has aimed at showing the way forward through creating a number of practice and scientific projects. Generic lessons from the scientific projects in this program are likely to be of interest to agricultural innovation in other densely populated regions in the world. Based on the executed scientific projects, generic lessons across the whole innovation program are derived. We found that the agricultural sector requires evolutionary rather than revolutionary changes to reshaping institutions. Measuring sustainability is possible against benchmarks and requires stakeholder agreement on sustainability values. Results show the importance of multiple social views and multiple stakeholder involvement in agricultural innovation. Findings call for flexible goal rather than process-oriented management of innovation. Findings also emphasise the essential role of profit in anchoring sustainable development in business. The results agree with concepts of evolutionary innovation. We conclude that there is no single best solution to making the agri-food sector more sustainable densely populated areas, but that the combination of a range of solutions and approaches is likely to provide the best way forward.

[1]  Pieter J. Beers,et al.  Chapter 4. For or against innovation? The influence of images , 2010 .

[2]  Chris Argyris.  Initiating Change That Perseveres , 1997 .

[3]  A. Veldkamp,et al.  Triggering transitions towards sustainable development of the Dutch agricultural sector: TransForum’s approach , 2011, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[4]  Raymond L. Ison,et al.  Systems Practice: How to Act in a Climate-Change World , 2010 .

[5]  Chris Dutilh,et al.  Sustainability: a gender studies perspective* , 2003 .

[6]  Ray Ison,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Social Learning in Water Resources Management Illuminating the Possibilities for Social Learning in the Management of Scotland's Water , 2007 .

[7]  John R. Koza,et al.  Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. , 1995, Artificial Life.

[8]  P. Senge.  The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook: Strategies and Tools for Building a Learning Organization , 2014 .

[9]  Danny Burns.  Systemic action research , 2007 .

[10]  H. V. Trijp,et al.  Cognitive and motivational structure of sustainability , 2011 .

[11]  Charles J. Kibert,et al.  Construction ecology : nature as the basis for green buildings , 2002 .

[12]  B. Frame,et al.  ‘Wicked’, ‘Messy’, and ‘Clumsy’: Long-Term Frameworks for Sustainability , 2008 .

[13]  Pieter J. Beers,et al.  Future sustainability and images , 2010 .

[14]  Patrick Steyaert,et al.  The role of knowledge and research in facilitating social learning among stakeholders in natural resources management in the French Atlantic coastal wetlands , 2007 .

[15]  René von Schomberg.  Science, Politics, and Morality: Scientific Uncertainty and Decision Making , 1993 .

[16]  Arnout R. H. Fischer,et al.  When Natural met Social: A Review of Collaboration between the Natural and Social Sciences , 2011 .

[17]  John Elkington,et al.  Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business , 1998 .

[18]  F. Geels.  Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[19]  Henk C. van Latesteijn,et al.  The TransForum Model: Transforming Agro Innovation Toward Sustainable Development , 2011 .

[20]  S. Rayner,et al.  Human choice and climate change , 1998 .

[21]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[22]  Pieter J. Beers,et al.  Inventions for future sustainable development in agriculture , 2010 .

[23]  Vic Barnett,et al.  Measuring sustainability , 2004, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[24]  John H. Holland,et al.  Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity , 1995 .

[25]  C. Arnade.  Using a Programming Approach to Measure International Agricultural Efficiency and Productivity , 1998 .

[26]  H. Christopher Peterson,et al.  Chapter 6. From motivating assumptions to a practical innovation model , 2010 .

[27]  F. Geels.  From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory , 2004 .

[28]  Michael Gibbons,et al.  Introduction: `Mode 2' Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge , 2003 .

[29]  Johannes S. C. Wiskerke,et al.  Seeds of transition: essays on novelty production, niches and regimes in agriculture. , 2004 .

[30]  N. Röling,et al.  Challenges to science and society in the sustainable management and use of water: investigating the role of social learning , 2007 .

[31]  G. Midgley.  Systemic Intervention: Philosophy, Methodology, and Practice , 2000 .

[32]  Charles M. Tiebout.  A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures , 1956, Journal of Political Economy.

[33]  A. Fischer,et al.  To Think or Not to Think:The Effect of Cognitive Deliberation on the Influence of Injunctive Versus Descriptive Social Norms , 2011 .

[34]  The transformation of the Dutch agricultural research system: An unfinished agenda , 1998 .

[35]  James J. Kay.  On complexity theory, exergy, and industrial ecology : Some implications for construction ecology , 2003 .

[36]  Johan Schot,et al.  Strategies for shifting technological systems : the case of the automobile system , 1994 .

[37]  Jerome R. Ravetz,et al.  The emergence of post-normal science , 1993 .