Karyometry detects subvisual differences in chromatin organisation state between non-recurrent and recurrent papillary urothelial neoplasms of low malignant potential

Aim: To analyse nuclear chromatin texture in non-recurrent and recurrent papillary urothelial neoplasms of low malignant potential (PUNLMPs). Materials: Ninety three karyometric features were analysed on haematoxylin and eosin stained sections from 20 PUNLMP cases: 10 from patients with a solitary PUNLMP lesion, who were disease free during at least eight years’ follow up, and 10 from patients with unifocal PUNLMP, one or more recurrences being seen during follow up. Results: Kruskal-Wallis analysis was used to search for features showing significant differences between recurrent and non-recurrent cases. Significance was better than p<0.005 for more than 20 features. Based on significance, six texture features were selected for discriminant analysis. Stepwise linear discriminant analysis reduced Wilk’s λ to 0.87, indicating a highly significant difference between the two multivariate data sets, but only modest ability to discriminate (70% correct case classification). A box sequential classifier was used based on data derived from discriminant analysis. The classifier took three classification steps and classified 19 of the 20 cases correctly (95% correct case classification). To determine whether significant case grouping could also be obtained based on an objective criterion, the merged data sets of non-recurrent and recurrent cases were submitted to the unsupervised learning algorithm P-index. Two clusters were formed with significant differences. The subsequent application of a Cooley/Lohnes classifier resulted in an overall correct case classification rate of 85%. Conclusions: Karyometry and multivariate analyses detect subvisual differences in chromatin organisation state between non-recurrent and recurrent PUNLMPs, thus allowing identification of lesions that do or do not recur.

[1]  W. Kruskal,et al.  Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis , 1952 .

[2]  Lawrence D. True,et al.  The World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classification of urothelial (transitional cell) neoplasms of the urinary bladder , 1998 .

[3]  G. Mikuz,et al.  Quantitative assessment of bladder cancer by nuclear texture analysis using automated high resolution image cytometry. , 1999, Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc.

[4]  J. McKenney,et al.  Relationship of Cytokeratin 20 and CD44 Protein Expression with WHO/ISUP Grade in pTa and pT1 Papillary Urothelial Neoplasia , 2000, Modern Pathology.

[5]  James Ranger-Moore,et al.  Subvisual changes in chromatin organization state are detected by karyometry in the histologically normal urothelium in patients with synchronous papillary carcinoma. , 2003, Human pathology.

[6]  K. Grigor,et al.  Identification of loci associated with putative recurrence genes in transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder , 2002, The Journal of pathology.

[7]  H. Samaratunga,et al.  Comparison of WHO/ISUP and WHO classification of noninvasive papillary urothelial neoplasms for risk of progression. , 2002, Urology.

[8]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Papillary urothelial neoplasms of low malignant potential , 1999, Cancer.

[9]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Classification and grading of the non-invasive urothelial neoplasms: recent advances and controversies , 2003, Journal of clinical pathology.

[10]  A. Llombart‐Bosch,et al.  Cytokeratin expression patterns in low‐grade papillary urothelial neoplasms of the urinary bladder , 2003, Cancer.

[11]  C. Busch,et al.  Recurrence and progression in low grade papillary urothelial tumors. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[12]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[13]  P. Bartels,et al.  Karyometry of secretory cell nuclei in high‐grade PIN lesions * , 2001, The Prostate.

[14]  T. Cremer,et al.  Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[15]  Christer Busch,et al.  The WHO/ISUP 1998 and WHO 1999 systems for malignancy grading of bladder cancer. Scientific foundation and translation to one another and previous systems , 2002, Virchows Archiv.

[16]  P H Bartels,et al.  Chromatin texture signatures in nuclei from prostate lesions. , 1998, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[17]  P. Bartels,et al.  Evaluation of the Papanicolaou stain for computer assisted cellular pattern recognition. , 1973, Acta Cytologica.

[18]  E. Jones,et al.  Comparison of the WHO/ISUP Classification and Cytokeratin 20 Expression in Predicting the Behavior of Low-Grade Papillary Urothelial Tumors , 2001, Modern Pathology.

[19]  A. Formiconi,et al.  Biologic Differences Between Noninvasive Papillary Urothelial Neoplasms of Low Malignant Potential and Low-Grade (Grade 1) Papillary Carcinomas of the Bladder , 2001, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[20]  J. Köllermann,et al.  Assessment of basal cell status and proliferative patterns in flat and papillary urothelial lesions: a contribution to the new WHO classification of the urothelial tumors of the urinary bladder. , 2000, Human pathology.

[21]  C. Cinti,et al.  pRb2/p130 and p107 control cell growth by multiple strategies and in association with different compartments within the nucleus * , 2001, Journal of cellular physiology.

[22]  V. Reuter,et al.  Bladder biopsy interpretation , 2004 .

[23]  T De Wilde,et al.  Identification by quantitative chromatin pattern analysis of patients at risk for recurrence of superficial transitional bladder carcinoma. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[24]  P. Bartels,et al.  Computer Analysis of Lymphocyte Images , 1980 .

[25]  D. N. Sparks Euclidean Cluster Analysis , 1973 .

[26]  A. Formiconi,et al.  Proliferative activity is the most significant predictor of recurrence in noninvasive papillary urothelial neoplasms of low malignant potential and grade 1 papillary carcinomas of the bladder , 2002, Cancer.

[27]  J. Epstein,et al.  Correlation of Ki-67 and p53 with the new World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology Classification System for Urothelial Neoplasia. , 2009 .

[28]  L. Sobin,et al.  Histological Typing of Urinary Bladder Tumours , 1999, International Histological Classification of Tumours.

[29]  B H Mayall,et al.  Characterization of chromatin distribution in cell nuclei. , 1986, Cytometry.

[30]  J. Southgate,et al.  Cytokeratin 20 expression by non‐invasive transitional cell carcinomas: potential for distinguishing recurrent from non‐recurrent disease , 1995, Histopathology.

[31]  David G. Bostwick,et al.  Urothelial papillary (exophytic) neoplasms , 2002, Virchows Archiv.