The dynamics, mixing, and thermonuclear burn of compressed foams with varied gas fills

Inertial confinement fusion (ICF) implosions involve highly coupled physics and complex hydrodynamics that are challenging to model computationally. Due to the sensitivity of such implosions to small features, detailed simulations require accurate accounting of the geometry and dimensionality of the initial conditions, including capsule defects and engineering features such as fill tubes used to insert gas into the capsule, yet this is computationally prohibitive. It is therefore difficult to evaluate whether discrepancies between the simulation and experiment arise from inadequate fidelity to the capsule geometry and drive conditions, uncertainties in physical data used by simulations, or inadequate physics. We present results from detailed high-resolution three-dimensional simulations of ICF implosions performed as part of the MARBLE campaign on the National Ignition Facility [Albright et al., Phys. Plasmas 29, 022702 (2022)]. These experiments are foam-filled separated-reactant experiments, where deuterons reside in the foam and tritons reside in the capsule gas fill and deuterium–tritium (DT) fusion reactions only occur in the presence of mixing between these materials. Material mixing in these experiments is primarily seeded by shock interaction with the complex geometry of the foam and gas fill, which induces the Richtmyer–Meshkov instability. We compare results for experiments with two different gas fills (ArT and HT), which lead to significant differences in the hydrodynamic and thermodynamic developments of the materials in the implosion. Our simulation results show generally good agreement with experiments and demonstrate a substantial impact of hydrodynamic flows on measured ion temperatures. The results suggest that viscosity, which was not included in our simulations, is the most important unmodeled physics and qualitatively explains the few discrepancies between the simulation and experiment. The results also suggest that the hydrodynamic treatment of shocks is inadequate to predict the heating and yield produced during shock flash, when the shock converges at the center of the implosion. Alternatively, underestimation of the level of radiative preheat from the shock front could explain many of the differences between the experiment and simulation. Nevertheless, simulations are able to reproduce many experimental observables within the level of experimental reproducibility, including most yields, time-resolved X-ray self-emission images, and an increase in burn-weighted ion temperature and neutron down-scattered ratio in the line of sight that includes a jet seeded by the glue spot that joins capsule hemispheres.

[1]  D. Turnbull,et al.  Inverse Bremsstrahlung Absorption. , 2023, Physical review letters.

[2]  L. Divol,et al.  Measurement of Dark Ice-Ablator Mix in Inertial Confinement Fusion. , 2022, Physical review letters.

[3]  J. Frenje,et al.  Measurements of ion-electron energy-transfer cross section in high-energy-density plasmas. , 2022, Physical Review E.

[4]  D. Clark,et al.  Modeling ablator grain structure impacts in ICF implosions , 2022, Physics of Plasmas.

[5]  M. McKay,et al.  The development of a high-resolution Eulerian radiation-hydrodynamics simulation capability for laser-driven Hohlraums , 2022, Physics of Plasmas.

[6]  J. Tollefson Exclusive: Laser-fusion facility heads back to the drawing board , 2022, Nature.

[7]  R. Teyssier,et al.  Turbulence generation by shock interaction with a highly nonuniform medium. , 2022, Physical review. E.

[8]  J. M. Mack,et al.  Lawson Criterion for Ignition Exceeded In An Inertial Fusion Experiment , 2022, 2022 IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science (ICOPS).

[9]  B. Morgan Simulation and Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes modeling of a three-component Rayleigh-Taylor mixing problem with thermonuclear burn. , 2022, Physical review. E.

[10]  B. Albright,et al.  A mechanism for reduced compression in indirectly driven layered capsule implosions , 2022, Physics of Plasmas.

[11]  O. Poujade,et al.  Classical molecular dynamic simulations and modeling of inverse bremsstrahlung heating in low Z weakly coupled plasmas , 2022, Physics of Plasmas.

[12]  M. Kruse,et al.  Design of inertial fusion implosions reaching the burning plasma regime , 2022, Nature Physics.

[13]  B. Blue,et al.  A polar direct drive liquid deuterium–tritium wetted foam target concept for inertial confinement fusion , 2021, Physics of Plasmas.

[14]  H. Robey,et al.  Use of computer vision for analysis of image datasets from high temperature plasma experiments. , 2021, The Review of scientific instruments.

[15]  Rajiv C. Shah,et al.  Results from single-shock Marble experiments studying thermonuclear burn in the presence of heterogeneous mix on the National Ignition Facility , 2021 .

[16]  O. Jones,et al.  Simulation studies of the interaction of laser radiation with additively manufactured foams , 2021, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion.

[17]  B. Albright,et al.  Experimental quantification of the impact of heterogeneous mix on thermonuclear burn , 2021, Physics of Plasmas.

[18]  B. Albright,et al.  Experimental validation of shock propagation through a foam with engineered macro-pores , 2021 .

[19]  B. Albright,et al.  Development of the Marble experimental platform at the National Ignition Facility , 2020 .

[20]  B. Albright,et al.  The rate of development of atomic mixing and temperature equilibration in inertial confinement fusion implosions , 2020 .

[21]  L. Pickworth,et al.  Hot-spot mix in large-scale HDC implosions at NIF , 2020 .

[22]  D. Clark,et al.  Cross-code comparison of the impact of the fill tube on high yield implosions on the National Ignition Facility , 2020, Physics of Plasmas.

[23]  J. Knauer,et al.  3D xRAGE simulation of inertial confinement fusion implosion with imposed mode 2 laser drive asymmetry , 2020 .

[24]  Hui Li,et al.  Magnetization around mix jets entering inertial confinement fusion fuel , 2020, 2007.04293.

[25]  J. A. Marozas,et al.  Coupling laser physics to radiation-hydrodynamics , 2020 .

[26]  L. Divol,et al.  Impact of Localized Radiative Loss on Inertial Confinement Fusion Implosions. , 2020, Physical review letters.

[27]  Gilbert W. Collins,et al.  Localized mix-induced radiative cooling in a capsule implosion at the National Ignition Facility. , 2020, Physical review. E.

[28]  Rajiv C. Shah,et al.  Observation of persistent species temperature separation in inertial confinement fusion mixtures , 2020, Nature Communications.

[29]  Tilak R. Dhakal,et al.  Effects of thermal conductivity of liquid layer in NIF wetted foam experiments , 2019, Physics of Plasmas.

[30]  K. Bowers,et al.  Plasma kinetic effects on interfacial mix and burn rates in multispatial dimensions , 2019, Physics of Plasmas.

[31]  D. Clark,et al.  Three-dimensional modeling and hydrodynamic scaling of National Ignition Facility implosions , 2019, Physics of Plasmas.

[32]  R. Rauenzahn,et al.  Multi-species plasma transport in 1D direct-drive ICF simulations , 2019, Physics of Plasmas.

[33]  Mehul V. Patel,et al.  Modeling and projecting implosion performance for the National Ignition Facility , 2018, Nuclear Fusion.

[34]  R. Paguio,et al.  Robustness to hydrodynamic instabilities in indirectly driven layered capsule implosions , 2018, Physics of Plasmas.

[35]  Jacob A. McFarland,et al.  Large-eddy simulation and Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes modeling of a reacting Rayleigh-Taylor mixing layer in a spherical geometry , 2018, Physical Review E.

[36]  V. Glebov,et al.  Diffusion-dominated mixing in moderate convergence implosions. , 2018, Physical review. E.

[37]  Gilbert W. Collins,et al.  A review on ab initio studies of static, transport, and optical properties of polystyrene under extreme conditions for inertial confinement fusion applications , 2018 .

[38]  W. Seka,et al.  First Observation of Cross-Beam Energy Transfer Mitigation for Direct-Drive Inertial Confinement Fusion Implosions Using Wavelength Detuning at the National Ignition Facility. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[39]  J. Oertel,et al.  Dry-Machining of Aerogel Foams, CH Foams, and Specially Engineered Foams Using Turn-Milling Techniques , 2018 .

[40]  P. B. Radha,et al.  Wavelength-detuning cross-beam energy transfer mitigation scheme for direct drive: Modeling and evidence from National Ignition Facility implosions , 2017 .

[41]  Len G. Margolin,et al.  Nonequilibrium Entropy in a Shock , 2017, Entropy.

[42]  J. Kline,et al.  The effects of convergence ratio on the implosion behavior of DT layered inertial confinement fusion capsules , 2017 .

[43]  R. Rauenzahn,et al.  High-resolution modeling of indirectly driven high-convergence layered inertial confinement fusion capsule implosions , 2017 .

[44]  J. Chittenden,et al.  Self-Generated Magnetic Fields in the Stagnation Phase of Indirect-Drive Implosions on the National Ignition Facility. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[45]  R. Rauenzahn,et al.  Plasma transport in an Eulerian AMR code , 2017 .

[46]  D. Clark,et al.  Capsule modeling of high foot implosion experiments on the National Ignition Facility , 2017 .

[47]  J. Ristorcelli Exact statistical results for binary mixing and reaction in variable density turbulence , 2017 .

[48]  M. Desjarlais,et al.  Density-functional calculations of transport properties in the nondegenerate limit and the role of electron-electron scattering. , 2016, Physical review. E.

[49]  J. Oertel,et al.  Process Development and Micro-Machining of MARBLE Foam-Cored Rexolite Hemi-Shell Ablator Capsules , 2016 .

[50]  A. N. G. Parra‐Vasquez,et al.  Development of Hierarchical, Tunable Pore Size Polymer Foams for ICF Targets , 2016 .

[51]  R. C. Shah,et al.  Detailed high-resolution three-dimensional simulations of OMEGA separated reactants inertial confinement fusion experiments , 2016 .

[52]  J. Oertel,et al.  Progress in the development of the MARBLE platform for studying thermonuclear burn in the presence of heterogeneous mix on OMEGA and the National Ignition Facility , 2016 .

[53]  Jay D. Salmonson,et al.  Three-dimensional simulations of low foot and high foot implosion experiments on the National Ignition Facility , 2016 .

[54]  Jr.,et al.  A NEW GENERATION OF LOS ALAMOS OPACITY TABLES , 2016, 1601.01005.

[55]  D. Clark,et al.  Three-dimensional hydrodynamics of the deceleration stage in inertial confinement fusion , 2015 .

[56]  David C. Eder,et al.  Radiation hydrodynamics modeling of the highest compression inertial confinement fusion ignition experiment from the National Ignition Campaign , 2015 .

[57]  R. Rauenzahn,et al.  The effects of plasma diffusion and viscosity on turbulent instability growth , 2014 .

[58]  O A Hurricane,et al.  Reduced instability growth with high-adiabat high-foot implosions at the National Ignition Facility. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[59]  Thomas J. Murphy,et al.  The effect of turbulent kinetic energy on inferred ion temperature from neutron spectra , 2014 .

[60]  Olivier Larroche,et al.  Species separation and modification of neutron diagnostics in inertial-confinement fusion , 2014, 1406.7108.

[61]  J. Chittenden,et al.  Relativistically correct DD and DT neutron spectra , 2014 .

[62]  D. Clark,et al.  Inhibition of turbulence in inertial-confinement-fusion hot spots by viscous dissipation. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[63]  Stephanie C. Tornga,et al.  Morphological and Performance Measures of Polyurethane Foams Using X-Ray CT and Mechanical Testing , 2014, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[64]  Fernando F Grinstein,et al.  Three-dimensional simulation strategy to determine the effects of turbulent mixing on inertial-confinement-fusion capsule performance. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[65]  F. Grinstein,et al.  Estimating the effective Reynolds number in implicit large-eddy simulation. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[66]  A. Thompson,et al.  Shock compression of hydrocarbon foam to 200 GPa: Experiments, atomistic simulations, and mesoscale hydrodynamic modeling , 2013 .

[67]  T. C. Sangster,et al.  Effects of local defect growth in direct-drive cryogenic implosions on OMEGA , 2013 .

[68]  Jose Milovich,et al.  Detailed implosion modeling of deuterium-tritium layered experiments on the National Ignition Facilitya) , 2013 .

[69]  J. Moody,et al.  The effect of laser pulse shape variations on the adiabat of NIF capsule implosions , 2013 .

[70]  A. Nikroo,et al.  Advancements in Capsule Surface Defect Characterization , 2013 .

[71]  K. Henderson,et al.  Measure of morphological and performance properties in polymeric silicone foams by X-ray tomography , 2013, Journal of Materials Science.

[72]  F. Dias,et al.  Shock propagation in regular wetted arrays of fibers , 2013 .

[73]  S. Wilks,et al.  Species separation in inertial confinement fusion fuels , 2013 .

[74]  Y. P. Opachich,et al.  Measuring x-ray burn history with the Streaked Polar Instrumentation for Diagnosing Energetic Radiation (SPIDER) at the National Ignition Facility (NIF) , 2012, Other Conferences.

[75]  N. Lanier,et al.  A monochromatic x-ray imaging system for characterizing low-density foams. , 2012, The Review of scientific instruments.

[76]  J. R. Rygg,et al.  Evidence for stratification of deuterium-tritium fuel in inertial confinement fusion implosions. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[77]  Richard A. Lerche,et al.  Atomic mix in directly driven inertial confinement implosions , 2011 .

[78]  V. A. Smalyuk,et al.  Diagnosing and controlling mix in National Ignition Facility implosion experiments a) , 2011 .

[79]  J. Bakosi,et al.  Extending the Langevin model to variable-density pressure-gradient-driven turbulence , 2011, 1101.1922.

[80]  M J Moran,et al.  The National Ignition Facility neutron time-of-flight system and its initial performance (invited). , 2010, The Review of scientific instruments.

[81]  T. C. Sangster,et al.  National Ignition Facility neutron time-of-flight measurements (invited). , 2010, The Review of scientific instruments.

[82]  J. Bakosi,et al.  Exploring the beta distribution in variable-density turbulent mixing , 2010, 1003.4046.

[83]  F. Dias,et al.  Modified shock velocity in heterogeneous wetted foams in the strong shock limit , 2010 .

[84]  L. Phillips Shock compression of a 2d model of DT embedded in a plastic foam , 2008 .

[85]  W. R. Oakes,et al.  The RAGE radiation-hydrodynamic code , 2008, 0804.1394.

[86]  M. Houry,et al.  High-gain direct-drive inertial confinement fusion for the Laser Mégajoule: recent progress , 2007 .

[87]  Neal R. Pederson,et al.  Gated x-ray detector for the National Ignition Facility , 2006 .

[88]  J. R. Ristorcelli,et al.  Passive scalar mixing: Analytic study of time scale ratio, variance, and mix rate , 2006 .

[89]  T. Collins,et al.  Shock propagation in deuterium-tritium-saturated foam , 2005 .

[90]  John Edwards,et al.  The effects of fill tubes on the hydrodynamics of ignition targets and prospects for ignition , 2005 .

[91]  H. Jourdren,et al.  Effects of microstructure on shock propagation in foams , 2004 .

[92]  E. Blackman,et al.  Hydrodynamic Interaction of Strong Shocks with Inhomogeneous Media. I. Adiabatic Case , 2001, astro-ph/0109282.

[93]  Steven W. Haan,et al.  Three-dimensional HYDRA simulations of National Ignition Facility targets , 2001 .

[94]  P. Dimotakis The mixing transition in turbulent flows , 2000, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[95]  A. Velikovich,et al.  Shock propagation in a low-density foam filled with fluid , 1998 .

[96]  G. Gorini,et al.  Relativistic calculation of fusion product spectra for thermonuclear plasmas , 1998 .

[97]  A. D. Kotelnikov,et al.  Shock induced turbulence in composite materials at moderate Reynolds numbers , 1998 .

[98]  J. Lindl Development of the indirect‐drive approach to inertial confinement fusion and the target physics basis for ignition and gain , 1995 .

[99]  A. M. Winslow Multifrequency-gray method for radiation diffusion with Compton scattering , 1995 .

[100]  D. Munro,et al.  Electron thermal conduction in LASNEX , 1994 .

[101]  J. D. Kilkenny,et al.  A review of the ablative stabilization of the Rayleigh--Taylor instability in regimes relevant to inertial confinement fusion , 1994 .

[102]  D. Youngs,et al.  Three-dimensional numerical simulation of turbulent mixing by Rayleigh-Taylor instability , 1991 .

[103]  Richard A. Sacks,et al.  Direct drive cryogenic ICF capsules employing D-T wetted foam , 1987 .

[104]  R. More,et al.  An electron conductivity model for dense plasmas , 1984 .

[105]  J. Broadwell,et al.  A simple model of mixing and chemical reaction in a turbulent shear layer , 1982, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[106]  Bryan E. Schmidt,et al.  Electron beam density measurements in shock waves in argon , 1969, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[107]  W. B. Thompson Transport Processes in the Plasma , 1960 .

[108]  R. D. Richtmyer Taylor instability in shock acceleration of compressible fluids , 1960 .

[109]  H. Mott-Smith,et al.  The Solution of the Boltzmann Equation for a Shock Wave , 1951 .

[110]  D. Youngs,et al.  Shock Propagation Through Multiphase Media* , 2005 .

[111]  P. Lax,et al.  On Upstream Differencing and Godunov-Type Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws , 1983 .

[112]  J. Nuckolls,et al.  Laser Compression of Matter to Super-High Densities: Thermonuclear (CTR) Applications , 1972, Nature.

[113]  E. Meshkov Instability of the interface of two gases accelerated by a shock wave , 1969 .