Is perceptual salience needed in explanations of the isolation effect?

The isolation effect is a well-known phenomenon that has a well-accepted explanation: An item that is isolated on a list becomes perceptually salient, which leads to extra rehearsal that enhances memory for the isolate. To evaluate this hypothesis, the authors isolated an item near the beginning of a list. Immediately after each item was presented for study, participants judged the likelihood of recalling the item. Although the isolation effect occurred, participants did not judge the isolate as being more memorable than the preceding item, suggesting that the isolate was not salient. In a second experiment, participants rehearsed items aloud. Isolation at the beginning of the list did not produce extra rehearsal. By contrast, isolation in the middle of the list produced extra rehearsal; however, even when the isolate did not receive extra rehearsal, an isolation effect was evident. Thus, salience and extra rehearsal are not necessary for producing an isolation effect.

[1]  An extension of the Köhler-Restorff inhibition phenomenon. , 1943 .

[2]  W. O. Jenkins,et al.  Isolation and spread of effect in serial learning. , 1948, The American journal of psychology.

[3]  R. T. Green Surprise as a factor in the von Restorff effect. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  D. Rundus Analysis of rehearsal processes in free recall. , 1971 .

[5]  G. Einstein,et al.  Free-recall performance as a function of overt rehearsal frequency , 1974 .

[6]  D. Bruce,et al.  Tests of an Organizational Hypothesis of Isolation Effects in Free Recall. , 1976 .

[7]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[8]  David B. Mitchell,et al.  Independent effects of semantic and nonsemantic distinctiveness , 1982 .

[9]  S. R. Schmidt Encoding and retrieval processes in the memory for conceptually distinctive events. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  Vito Modigliani,et al.  Distributed rehearsals and the primacy effect in single-trial free recall. , 1987 .

[11]  S. R. Schmidt,et al.  Can we have a distinctive theory of memory? , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[12]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  How Shall We Explain the Delayed-Judgment-Of-Learning Effect? , 1992 .

[13]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Effect of overlearning on the feeling of knowing is more detectable in within-subject than in between-subject designs. , 1993, The American journal of psychology.

[14]  A. Koriat How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. , 1993 .

[15]  R. Hunt The subtlety of distinctiveness: What von Restorff really did , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[16]  E. Donchin,et al.  Encoding processes and memory organization: a model of the von Restorff effect. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  W. Sommer,et al.  Metamemory, distinctiveness, and event-related potentials in recognition memory for faces , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[18]  A. Koriat Monitoring one's own knowledge during study : A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning , 1997 .

[19]  C. A. Weaver,et al.  Enhanced metamemory at delays: why do judgments of learning improve over time? , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  Bennett L. Schwartz,et al.  The Inferential and Experiential Bases of Metamemory , 1997 .

[21]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Distinctiveness effects in recall: , 1998 .