I-81 In-Place Pavement Recycling Project

During the 2011 construction season, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) completed an in-place pavement recycling project to rehabilitate a section of pavement on I-81 near Staunton, Virginia. The project consisted of a 3.66-mile section of southbound I-81 in Augusta County. VDOT employed three in-place pavement recycling techniques and a unique traffic management plan to accomplish the work. The recycling processes included full-depth reclamation (FDR), cold in-place recycling (CIR), and cold central-plant recycling (CCPR). This project marked the first time in the United States that these three recycling techniques were combined in one project on the interstate system. Materials for both the CIR and CCPR were produced using hydraulic cement and foamed asphalt. A combination of hydraulic cement and lime kiln dust was chosen for the FDR process. The purpose of this research portion of this construction project was threefold: (1) to allow VDOT personnel to gain experience with the specific laboratory mix designs, field evaluation, and quality assurance procedures; (2) to characterize the structural properties of the materials used in the recycling project; and (3) to document the performance of the entire rehabilitated section during its initial 3-year service period. Various laboratory tests were conducted on materials collected before, during, and after construction to characterize the materials. These tests included gradation, resilient modulus, indirect tensile strength, dynamic modulus, and flow number. Additional tests to document the performance of the project included ride quality testing and rut-depth measurements collected via a traffic-speed profiler; pavement layer thickness measurements by ground penetrating radar; and structural capacity measurements by the falling weight deflectometer. From the results of this study, the combined structural layer coefficient for the CCPR and FDR materials was calculated as 0.37. The structural layer coefficient for the CIR material was calculated as 0.39. The structural layer coefficient for the CCPR material was calculated to have a likely range of 0.37 to 0.44. Laboratory testing showed that the performance of the CCPR and CIR materials is expected to be similar. The field performance tests demonstrated that the section of pavement rehabilitated by the three in-place recycling methods continues to perform well after nearly 3 years of high-volume interstate traffic. This study recommends that VDOT pursue in-place recycling where it is most suitable. The study also recommends that VDOT consider increasing the structural layer coefficients used in the design for recycled materials. Further, VDOT should continue to monitor the performance of the I-81 project and other in-place recycling projects in an effort to develop long-term performance data. Finally, the study recommends that VDOT consider using long-term lane closure strategies similar to those employed in this project on other major pavement rehabilitation projects.

[1]  Dennis L. Eggett,et al.  Cement Stabilization of Aggregate Base Material Blended with Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement , 2007 .

[2]  Brian K Diefenderfer,et al.  In-Place Pavement Recycling on I-81 in Virginia , 2012 .

[3]  Becca Lane,et al.  Implementation of Cold In-Place Recycling with Expanded Asphalt Technology in Canada , 2005 .

[4]  Hosin David Lee,et al.  Laboratory Performance Evaluation of CIR-emulsion and Its Comparison against CIR-foam Test Results from Phase II , 2009 .

[5]  Dennis A Morian,et al.  Experience with Cold In-Place Recycling as a Reflective Crack Control Technique: Twenty Years Later , 2004 .

[6]  Zhong Wu,et al.  Permanent deformation analysis of hot-mix asphalt mixtures with simple performance tests and 2002 mechanistic-empirical pavement design software , 2006 .

[7]  Curtis F Berthelot,et al.  Mechanistic Comparison of Cement- and Bituminous-Stabilized Granular Base Systems , 2007 .

[8]  Brian Marquis,et al.  Determination of Structural Layer Coefficient for Roadway Recycling Using Foamed Asphalt , 2003 .

[9]  Brian K Diefenderfer,et al.  Time-Dependent Structural Response of Full-Depth Reclamation , 2011 .

[10]  Brian K Diefenderfer,et al.  Evaluation of Cold In-Place and Cold Central-Plant Recycling Methods Using Laboratory Testing of Field-Cored Specimens , 2013 .

[11]  W Spencer Guthrie,et al.  Evaluation of Cement-Stabilized Full-Depth-Recycled Base Materials for Frost and Early Traffic Conditions , 2006 .

[12]  Mary Stroup-Gardiner Recycling and Reclamation of Asphalt Pavements Using In-Place Methods , 2011 .

[13]  Ramon Bonaquist Wisconsin Mixture Characterization Using the Asphalt Mixture Performance Tester (AMPT) on Historical Aggregate Structures , 2010 .

[14]  Tom Kazmierowski,et al.  Ten-Year Performance Review of In Situ Hot-Mix Recycling in Ontario , 1999 .

[15]  Charles T. Jahren,et al.  Evaluation of Long-Term Field Performance of Cold In-Place Recycled Roads: Field and Laboratory Testing , 2007 .

[16]  Sidney M. Levy,et al.  Virginia Department of Transportation , 2011 .

[17]  Andrea Grilli,et al.  A study on the mechanical behaviour of cement–bitumen treated materials , 2011 .

[18]  Sohila Bemanian,et al.  Alternative Strategies for Rehabilitation of Low-Volume Roads in Nevada , 2007 .

[19]  Guillermo Thenoux,et al.  Degree of Influence of Active Fillers on Properties of Recycled Mixes with Foamed Asphalt , 2009 .

[20]  Guillermo Thenoux,et al.  Energy consumption comparison for different asphalt pavements rehabilitation techniques used in Chile , 2007 .

[21]  Mofreh Saleh New Zealand Experience with Foam Bitumen Stabilization , 2004 .

[22]  Lance E Dougald,et al.  Effectiveness of a Control Strategy for Forced-Detour Traffic in Continuous Lane Closure within a Rural Work Zone , 2012 .

[23]  M. Cubrinovski,et al.  Performance of Foamed Bitumen Pavements in Accelerated Testing Facility , 2012 .

[24]  Mofreh Saleh Effect of Aggregate Gradation, Mineral Fillers, Bitumen Grade, and Source on Mechanical Properties of Foamed Bitumen-Stabilized Mixes , 2006 .

[25]  Brian K Diefenderfer,et al.  Asphalt Concrete Rutting Resistance Assessment by the Flow Number Test , 2011 .

[26]  Tom Scullion,et al.  Evaluation of Laboratory Mix Design and Field Performance of Asphalt Emulsion and Cement Stabilized Full-Depth Reclamation Project in Texas , 2008 .

[27]  Andreas Nataatmadja Some Characteristics of Foamed Bitumen Mixes , 2001 .

[28]  James A Crovetti Construction and Performance of Fly Ash-Stabilized Cold In-Place Recycled Asphalt Pavement in Wisconsin , 2000 .

[29]  Youngguk Seo,et al.  Dynamic Modulus Testing of Asphalt Concrete in Indirect Tension Mode , 2004 .

[30]  Christina Plati,et al.  Early-Life Performance of Cold-in-Place Pavement Recycling with Foamed Asphalt Technique , 2007 .

[31]  Erland O Lukanen,et al.  Engineered Cold In-Place Recycling Project: Blue Earth County State Aid Highway 20, Minnesota , 2002 .

[32]  Matthew Kroge,et al.  Full-Depth Reclamation with Engineered Emulsion in Fairburn, Georgia , 2009 .

[33]  Tom Scullion,et al.  Failure Investigation of a Foamed-Asphalt Highway Project , 2006 .

[34]  Yongjoo Kim,et al.  Dynamic Modulus and Repeated Load Tests of Cold In-Place Recycling Mixtures Using Foamed Asphalt , 2009 .

[35]  Tom Scullion,et al.  AUTOMATED PAVEMENT SUBSURFACE PROFILING USING RADAR: CASE STUDIES OF FOUR EXPERIMENTAL FIELD SITES , 1992 .

[36]  Kenneth Maser,et al.  Use of Ground-Penetrating Radar Data for Rehabilitation of Composite Pavements on High-Volume Roads , 2002 .

[37]  Rajib B. Mallick,et al.  Laboratory Study of Full-Depth Reclamation Mixes , 2002 .

[38]  H. Lee,et al.  Examination of Curing Criteria for Cold In-Place Recycling (Phase 3: Calibration of Moisture Loss Indices and Development of Stiffness Gain Model) , 2008 .

[39]  John T Harvey,et al.  Temperature sensitivity of foamed asphalt mix stiffness: field and lab study , 2007 .

[40]  Rajib B. Mallick,et al.  Evaluation of Performance of Full-Depth Reclamation Mixes , 2002 .

[41]  Charles T. Jahren,et al.  Evaluation of Long-Term Field Performance of Cold In-Place Recycled Roads: Summary Report , 2007 .

[42]  Sohila Bemanian,et al.  Cold In-Place Recycling and Full-Depth Reclamation Projects by Nevada Department of Transportation: State of the Practice , 2006 .

[43]  David Mark Jared,et al.  Georgia's Use of Cement-Stabilized Reclaimed Base in Full-Depth Reclamation , 2006 .

[44]  Brian K Diefenderfer,et al.  Analysis of Full-Depth Reclamation Trial Sections in Virginia , 2011 .

[45]  John T Harvey,et al.  Micromechanics of Effects of Mixing Moisture on Foamed Asphalt Mix Properties , 2009 .

[46]  Andreas Loizos,et al.  In-situ characterization of foamed bitumen treated layer mixes for heavy-duty pavements , 2007 .

[47]  Murad Y. Abu-Farsakh,et al.  Louisiana Experience with Foamed Recycled Asphalt Pavement Base Materials , 2003 .

[48]  John T Harvey,et al.  An Investigation of the Curing Mechanism of Foamed Asphalt Mixes Based on Micromechanics Principles , 2009 .

[49]  Peter E. Sebaaly,et al.  Performance of Cold In-Place Recycling in Nevada , 2004 .

[50]  Andreas Loizos,et al.  Evaluation of Foamed Asphalt Cold In-Place Pavement Recycling Using Nondestructive Techniques , 2006 .

[51]  Soheil Nazarian,et al.  In-place determination of stiffness of subsurface reclaimed layers in thin surface hot-mix asphalt pavements: Fast nondestructive test and analysis method , 2006 .

[52]  Charles W. Schwartz,et al.  Design and Evaluation of Foamed Asphalt Base Materials , 2013 .

[53]  Misko Cubrinovski,et al.  Full-Scale Experiment on Foam Bitumen Pavements in an Accelerated Testing Facility , 2009 .