Choice of optimal averaging radii for temporal GRACE gravity solutions, a comparison with GPS and satellite altimetry

SUMMARY One of the initial challenges of the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) mission is to validate the accuracy of the time-variable gravity fields. These gravity fields contain both spatially correlated (systematic) and random noise and hence spatial averaging needs to be implemented. Before the fields may be interpreted, optimum averaging radii need to be determined through comparison with independent data. We compare time-series of vertical solid earth deformations computed from 22 approximately monthly GRACE gravity fields (covering 2002.3 until 2004.6) with vertical displacements measured using a global GPS network of 63 sites, about half of which are located on small islands. The GPS data were processed using a Precise Point Positioning approach using fiducial free orbits and attempting to minimize propagated systematic errors. The optimum mean correlations were obtained at 500 km averaging radii for continental sites (R = 0.55), > =2000 km for island sites (R = 0.3). Subtracting the GRACE displacement time-series from the GPS ones revealed a mean variance reduction of ∼14 per cent. To supplement the GPS data at the island sites, we also computed displacements based on TOPEX/POSEIDON (T/P) sea surface height data between 2002.3 and 2004. corrected for steric effects. Correlations reached a maximum at 2000 km with a correlation of 0.38, increasing to 0.47 after the removal of six outlying sites. Overall, we conclude that optimum averaging radii are ∼500 km for continental sites and >=2000 km over the oceans, but that the measurement precision of GPS and T/P may be inflating these values.

[1]  C. Jekeli.  Alternative methods to smooth the Earth's gravity field , 1981 .

[2]  Peter J. Clarke,et al.  Geocenter motions from GPS: A unified observation model , 2006 .

[3]  F. Bryan,et al.  Time variability of the Earth's gravity field: Hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACE , 1998 .

[4]  J. Zumberge,et al.  Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks , 1997 .

[5]  Paul Tregoning,et al.  Impact of solid Earth tide models on GPS coordinate and tropospheric time series , 2006 .

[6]  O. Andersen,et al.  Correcting GRACE gravity fields for ocean tide effects , 2002 .

[7]  Peter J. Clarke,et al.  Validation of ocean tide models around Antarctica using onshore GPS and gravity data , 2005 .

[8]  W. Farrell.  Deformation of the Earth by surface loads , 1972 .

[9]  T. van Dam,et al.  Atmospheric pressure loading corrections applied to GPS data at the observation level , 2005 .

[10]  R. Steven Nerem,et al.  Preliminary observations of global ocean mass variations with GRACE , 2004 .

[11]  G. Blewitt,et al.  A New Global Mode of Earth Deformation: Seasonal Cycle Detected , 2001, Science.

[12]  J. Wahr,et al.  Can surface pressure be used to remove atmospheric , 2001 .

[13]  John C. Ries,et al.  Large scale ocean circulation from the GRACE GGM01 Geoid , 2003 .

[14]  Mike P. Stewart,et al.  Aliased tidal signatures in continuous GPS height time series , 2003 .

[15]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  Influence of mapping function parameters on global GPS network analyses: Comparisons between NMF and IMF , 2006 .

[16]  N. K. Pavlis,et al.  Error spectrum for the global M2 ocean tide , 2001 .

[17]  M. Watkins,et al.  GRACE Measurements of Mass Variability in the Earth System , 2004, Science.

[18]  Steven M. Klosko,et al.  Monthly spherical harmonic gravity field solutions determined from GRACE inter‐satellite range‐rate data alone , 2006 .

[19]  O. Andersen,et al.  Global inter‐annual gravity changes from GRACE: Early results , 2005 .

[20]  Michael B. Heflin,et al.  The effect of the second order GPS ionospheric correction on receiver positions , 2003 .

[21]  Timothy P. Boyer,et al.  World Ocean Atlas 1994. Volume 4. Temperature , 1994 .

[22]  R. Nerem,et al.  Observations of annual variations of the Earth's gravitational field using satellite laser ranging and geophysical models , 2000 .

[23]  J. Boy,et al.  Regional gravity variations in Europe from superconducting gravimeters , 2004 .

[24]  Peter Steigenberger,et al.  Impact of higher‐order ionospheric terms on GPS estimates , 2005 .

[25]  Victor Zlotnicki,et al.  Time‐variable gravity from GRACE: First results , 2004 .

[26]  Y. Bar-Sever,et al.  Estimating horizontal gradients of tropospheric path delay with a single GPS receiver , 1998 .

[27]  P. Knudsen.  Ocean Tides in GRACE Monthly Averaged Gravity Fields , 2003 .

[28]  Stephen M. Lichten,et al.  Estimation and filtering for high-precision GPS positioning applications , 1990 .

[29]  Pedro Elosegui,et al.  Climate‐driven deformation of the solid Earth from GRACE and GPS , 2004 .

[30]  G. Blewitt.  Self‐consistency in reference frames, geocenter definition, and surface loading of the solid Earth , 2003 .

[31]  W. Dillinger,et al.  Vertical Ocean-loading Deformations Derived from a Global GPS Network. , 2001 .

[32]  John C. Ries,et al.  Low degree gravitational changes from GRACE: Validation and interpretation , 2004 .