Multiple-illumination photoacoustic tomography

Previously we described the potential for multiple illumination photoacoustic tomography to provide quantitative reconstructions, however this work used only simulated data. We have developed a custom photoacoustic-ultrasound tomography system capable of multiple illuminations and parallel acquisition from a 256 element 5 MHz transducer ring array with 8-cm diameter. The multiple illumination scheme uses a free-space light delivery geometry where a rotational stage scans a pulsed laser beam onto different incident locations around the sample. For each illumination location a photoacoustic image is reconstructed using a modified backprojection algorithm. Images from different source locations have the potential to be combined to form an improved deep-tissue image using our previously developed iterative algorithms. We complement the photoacoustic imaging data with unique ultrasound imaging data. Most previous ultrasound tomography methods have used migration algorithms, iterative ray-based analysis, wave-equation modeling, or frequency-based algorithms that all demand large amounts of data and computational power. We propose a new UST method that offers isotropic resolution, provides scattering contrast, as well as the potential for measuring ultrasound scattering anisotropy and decoupling density and compressibility contributions. The imaging system is driven by a Verasonics scan engine and programmed for both ultrasound and photoacoustic imaging modes. Resolution has been measured to be 150 μm for ultrasound and 200 μm for photoacoustic images. Imaging capabilities are demonstrated on phantoms with custom-tailored ultrasound scattering and optical properties, as well as in murine models.

[1]  Neb Duric,et al.  Breast ultrasound tomography: bridging the gap to clinical practice , 2012, Medical Imaging.

[2]  Vasilis Ntziachristos,et al.  Performance of iterative optoacoustic tomography with experimental data , 2009 .

[3]  James F. Greenleaf,et al.  Quantitative Cross-Sectional Imaging of Ultrasound Parameters , 1977 .

[4]  Guillaume Bal,et al.  On multi-spectral quantitative photoacoustic tomography in diffusive regime , 2012 .

[5]  Roger J. Zemp,et al.  Multiple-illumination photoacoustic tomography: reconstructing absorption, scattering, and Grüeneisen coefficient distributions , 2011, BiOS.

[6]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Prospects of photoacoustic tomography. , 2008, Medical physics.

[7]  Pai-Chi Li,et al.  Hybrid optoacoustic tomography and pulse-echo ultrasonography using concave arrays , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[8]  H. Gemmeke,et al.  3D ultrasound computer tomography for medical imaging , 2007 .

[9]  Umer Zeeshan Ijaz,et al.  Multidirectional scattering models for 3-dimensional ultrasound imaging. , 2013, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[10]  B. T. Cox,et al.  The challenges for quantitative photoacoustic imaging , 2009, BiOS.

[11]  Tyler Harrison,et al.  A least-squares fixed-point iterative algorithm for multiple illumination photoacoustic tomography. , 2013, Biomedical optics express.

[12]  Simon R Arridge,et al.  Two-dimensional quantitative photoacoustic image reconstruction of absorption distributions in scattering media by use of a simple iterative method. , 2006, Applied optics.

[13]  Bryan J. Ranger,et al.  Breast ultrasound tomography versus MRI for clinical display of anatomy and tumor rendering: preliminary results. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Universal back-projection algorithm for photoacoustic computed tomography. , 2005 .

[15]  H. Ermert,et al.  Parametric imaging of specular reflections and diffuse scattering of tissue from multi-directional ultrasound echo signal data , 2008, 2008 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium.

[16]  Olsi Rama,et al.  Development of ultrasound tomography for breast imaging: technical assessment. , 2005, Medical physics.