Dynamics of flow velocities in endocardial and epicardial coronary arterioles.

The subendocardium is the most vulnerable area of the left ventricle to the effects of hypoperfusion and ischemia. Despite this well-acknowledged observation, the mechanisms underlying this susceptibility are not elucidated, although numerous explanations including differences in transmural distribution of hemodynamics, metabolism, and wall stresses have been proposed. Our goal was to make dynamic measurements of endocardial and epicardial flow velocities, which reflect hemodynamic and wall stresses, to approach this problem. We measured blood flow velocities in subendocardial and subepicardial coronary arterioles of in vivo beating canine hearts using a high-speed, charge-coupled device, intravital videomicroscope with a rod-probe lens. Subendocardial flow was characterized by remarkable systolic flow-velocity reversal (systolic slosh ratio, 84%; measurable velocity of retrograde flow, faster than -40 mm/s), which contrasted to predominant forward-flow velocity during systole in the subepicardial arterioles (systolic slosh ratio, 25%; maximum velocity, approximately -20 mm/s; P < 0.0005 and 0.05 vs. subendocardial arterioles, respectively). We speculate that this retrograde flow is "wasteful," because this volume must be refilled during the subsequent diastole, which thereby detracts from the net perfusion as well as the time for perfusion. Accordingly, we also believe that the retrograde systolic blood flow contributes to the vulnerability of the subendocardium to ischemia.

[1]  J D Laird,et al.  Diastolic‐Systolic Coronary Flow Differences are Caused by Intramyocardial Pump Action in the Anesthetized Dog , 1981, Circulation research.

[2]  W. Chilian,et al.  Microvascular pressures and resistances in the left ventricular subepicardium and subendocardium. , 1991, Circulation research.

[3]  F. Kajiya,et al.  Alpha-adrenergic vasoconstriction reduces systolic retrograde coronary blood flow. , 1997, The American journal of physiology.

[4]  Eiji Toyota,et al.  Dynamic Changes in Three-Dimensional Architecture and Vascular Volume of Transmural Coronary Microvasculature Between Diastolic- and Systolic-Arrested Rat Hearts , 2002, Circulation.

[5]  F. Kajiya,et al.  Effect of coronary stenosis on phasic pattern of septal artery in dogs. , 1992, The American journal of physiology.

[6]  F. Kajiya,et al.  The relationship between cardiac contraction and intramyocardial hemodynamics , 1997, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[7]  Yasuo Ogasawara,et al.  Intramyocardial Influences on Blood Flow Distributions in the Myocardial Wall , 2000, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  J. A. E. Spaan,et al.  Mechanical determinants of myocardial perfusion , 1995, Basic Research in Cardiology.

[9]  T Takishima,et al.  Phasic Blood Flow Velocity Pattern in Epimyocardial Microvessels in the Beating Canine Left Ventricle , 1986, Circulation research.

[10]  F. Kajiya,et al.  Diameters of subendocardial arterioles and venules during prolonged diastole in canine left ventricles. , 1994, Circulation research.

[11]  F. Yin,et al.  Ventricular wall stress. , 1981, Circulation research.

[12]  J I Hoffman,et al.  Cardiac contraction affects deep myocardial vessels predominantly. , 1991, The American journal of physiology.

[13]  J. Hoffman,et al.  Transmural myocardial perfusion. , 1987, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[14]  J A Neubauer,et al.  Quantitative Determination of Regional Oxygen Consumption in the Dog Heart , 1978, Circulation research.

[15]  F Kajiya,et al.  In vivo observation of subendocardial microvessels of the beating porcine heart using a needle-probe videomicroscope with a CCD camera. , 1993, Circulation research.

[16]  F. Kajiya,et al.  α-Adrenergic vasoconstriction reduces systolic retrograde coronary blood flow. , 1997, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[17]  F. Kajiya,et al.  Direct in vivo observation of subendocardial arteriolar response during reactive hyperemia. , 1995, Circulation research.

[18]  L. Kuo,et al.  Adenosine potentiates flow-induced dilation of coronary arterioles by activating KATP channels in endothelium. , 1995, The American journal of physiology.

[19]  J Grayson,et al.  Transmural distribution of intramyocardial pressure measured by micropipette technique. , 1985, The American journal of physiology.

[20]  C. Jones,et al.  Endothelial regulation of coronary microvascular tone under physiological and pathophysiological conditions. , 1993, European heart journal.

[21]  R Krams,et al.  Varying elastance concept may explain coronary systolic flow impediment. , 1989, The American journal of physiology.

[22]  J I Hoffman,et al.  Why is myocardial ischaemia so commonly subendocardial? , 1981, Clinical science.

[23]  F. Kajiya,et al.  Atrial contractility affects phasic blood flow velocity of atrial small vessels in the dog. , 1992, Cardiovascular research.

[24]  F. Kajiya,et al.  Integrative physiology of coronary microcirculation. , 1999, The Japanese journal of physiology.

[25]  J I Hoffman,et al.  Does systolic subepicardial perfusion come from retrograde subendocardial flow? , 1992, The American journal of physiology.

[26]  Kenkichi Tanioka,et al.  Synchrotron microangiography reveals configurational changes and to-and-fro flow in intramyocardial vessels. , 1999, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[27]  Y. Shinozaki,et al.  New nonradioactive microspheres and more sensitive X-ray fluorescence to measure regional blood flow. , 1992, The American journal of physiology.

[28]  J. Hoffman,et al.  Changes in contractility and afterload have only slight effects on subendocardial systolic flow impediment. , 1995, The American journal of physiology.

[29]  M. Marcus,et al.  Phasic Coronary Blood Flow Velocity in Intramural and Epicardial Coronary Arteries , 1982, Circulation research.

[30]  J. Spaan,et al.  Forward coronary flow normally seen in systole is the result of both forward and concealed back flow , 1981, Basic Research in Cardiology.

[31]  E. Feigl,et al.  Coronary physiology. , 1983, Physiological reviews.