Prosodic cues to semantic structure in native and nonnative listening

Listeners efficiently exploit sentence prosody to direct attention to words bearing sentence accent. This effect has been explained as a search for focus, furthering rapid apprehension of semantic structure. A first experiment supported this explanation: English listeners detected phoneme targets in sentences more rapidly when the target-bearing words were in accented position or in focussed position, but the two effects interacted, consistent with the claim that the effects serve a common cause. In a second experiment a similar asymmetry was observed with Dutch listeners and Dutch sentences. In a third and a fourth experiment, proficient Dutch users of English heard English sentences; here, however, the two effects did not interact. The results suggest that less efficient mapping of prosody to semantics may be one way in which nonnative listening fails to equal native listening.

[1]  A. Cutler.  Phoneme-monitoring reaction time as a function of preceding intonation contour , 1976 .

[2]  Alice Turk,et al.  The domain of accentual lengthening in American English , 1997 .

[3]  Ann Cutler,et al.  Prosody in the Comprehension of Spoken Language: A Literature Review , 1997, Language and speech.

[4]  Florien J. van Beinum,et al.  The role of 'given' and 'new in the production and perception of vowel contrasts in read text and in spontaneous speech , 1989, EUROSPEECH.

[5]  R. Cole,et al.  Perceptibility of phonetic features in fluent speech. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  S. Nooteboom,et al.  Accents, focus distribution, and the perceived distribution of given and new information: An experiment. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  A. Cutler,et al.  Detection of Target Phonemes in Spontaneous and Read Speech , 1988, Language and speech.

[8]  J. D. Pijper,et al.  Modelling British English Intonation , 1998 .

[9]  J. K. Bock,et al.  Intonational marking of given and new information: Some consequences for comprehension , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[10]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  A typological study of stress ‘deafness’ , 2002 .

[11]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Components of prosodic effects in speech recognition , 1987 .

[12]  C. Gussenhoven,et al.  On the Grammar and Semantics of Sentence Accents in Dutch , 1982 .

[13]  D. Vanlancker-Sidtis.  Auditory recognition of idioms by native and nonnative speakers of English: It takes one to know one , 2003, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[14]  John Archibald,et al.  The Learnability of English Metrical Parameters by Adult Spanish Speakers. , 1993 .

[15]  D. Hart,et al.  Second Language Processing at Different Ages: Do Younger Learners Pay More Attention to Prosodic Cues to Sentence Structure? , 1995 .

[16]  H. Ying,et al.  Multiple Constraints on Processing Ambiguous Sentences: Evidence from Adult L2 Learners. , 1996 .

[17]  John Archibald,et al.  Transfer of L1 Parameter Settings: Some Empirical Evidence from Polish Metrics , 1992, Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique.

[18]  N. Ellis,et al.  Cantonese Speakers' Memory for English Sentences with Prosodic Cues , 2000 .

[19]  P. Friederici.  Language Comprehension: A Biological Perspective , 1999, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[20]  C J Darwin,et al.  Phoneme-monitoring reaction time and preceding prosody: Effects of stop closure duration and of fundamental frequency , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Prosodic structure and word recognition , 1998 .

[22]  J. V. Santen,et al.  The analysis of contextual effects on segmental duration , 1990 .

[23]  James G. Martin,et al.  Reaction Time to Phoneme Targets as a Function of Rhythmic Cues in Continuous Speech. , 1974 .

[24]  Enric Vallduví,et al.  The Informational Component , 1990 .

[25]  Lynne C. Nygaard,et al.  Contextual coherence and attention in phoneme monitoring , 1992 .

[26]  D. Dahan,et al.  Interspeaker Variability in Emphatic Accent Production in French , 1996, Language and speech.

[27]  D. Klatt.  Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: acoustic and perceptual evidence. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  The Effect of Focus on Memory for Words in Sentences , 1995 .

[29]  Alice Turk,et al.  A cross-linguistic study of accentual lengthening: Dutch vs. English , 1999 .

[30]  Reinhard Blutner,et al.  Sentence processing and lexical access: The influence of the focus-identifying task , 1988 .

[31]  Marc Pierce,et al.  Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe , 2000 .

[32]  W. Eefting.  The effect of ‘‘information value’’ and ‘‘accentuation’’ on the duration of Dutch words, syllables, and segments , 1991 .

[33]  A. Cutler.  Prosody and sentence perception in English , 1982 .

[34]  Steven H. Weinberger,et al.  Interlanguage phonology : the acquisition of a second language sound system , 1987 .

[35]  D. J. Foss,et al.  On the Role of Sentence Stress in Sentence Processing , 1977, Language and speech.

[36]  J. Fodor,et al.  Semantic focus and sentence comprehension , 1979, Cognition.

[37]  R. Berkovits,et al.  Perception of Intonation in Native and Non-Native Speakers of English , 1980, Language and speech.

[38]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Sentence Prosody: Intonation, Stress and Phrasing , 1996 .

[39]  J. Archibald,et al.  The acquisition of English stress by speakers of nonaccentual languages: lexical storage versus computation of stress , 1997 .

[40]  J. Mehler,et al.  A destressing deafness in French , 1997 .

[41]  Kazuyuki Watanabe,et al.  Sentence stress perception by Japanese students , 1988 .

[42]  Sieb G. Nooteboom,et al.  Opposite effects of accentuation and deaccentuation on verification latencies for given and new information , 1987 .

[43]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Phoneme detection as a tool for comparing perception of natural and synthetic speech , 1993, Comput. Speech Lang..

[44]  S. Nooteboom,et al.  THE PROSODY OF SPEECH: MELODY AND RHYTHM , 2001 .