Structure and Dynamics of a 'T-Shaped' Knowledge: From Individuals to Cooperating Communities of Practice

In a fast-changing environment, organizations face conditions of growing complexity that challenge decision-making and innovation activities, highlighting an increasing need to develop dynamic capabilities. In this scenario, our focus is on service science's recent call for “T-shaped professionals,” identified as people possessing both functional/disciplinary expertise and ability to apply knowledge across different contexts. Starting from this notion and by adopting a viable systems approach (vSa), we shift focus from individuals to organizations, providing an interpretation of the structure and dynamics of a “T-shaped knowledge” to be developed with respect to a distributed knowledge management network in which organizations pursue learning-by-interaction and knowledge cocreation. By integrating the vSa and the distributed knowledge management framework (DKMF), our proposal provides a multidimensional vSa-DKMF metamodel to assess the relational conditions among cooperating organizations as well as to provide guidelines for the construction of a knowledge network built on the idea of T-shaped knowledge. To illustrate the practical aspects of vSa-DKMF, we focus on the case of open communities of practice as an emblematic example of developing a T-shaped knowledge starting from a specialized (“I-shaped”) knowledge.

[1]  T. Masaki.  Structure and Dynamics , 2002 .

[2]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[3]  J. Sarama,et al.  Learning Trajectories in Early Mathematics – Sequences of Acquisition and Teaching , 2010 .

[4]  Enzo Rullani,et al.  Il management e le macchine , 1990 .

[5]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[6]  Bogdan Gabrys,et al.  Innovation through Knowledge Transfer 2012 , 2014 .

[7]  Paolo Piciocchi,et al.  Network Creativity to Reduce Strategic Ambiguity in Turbulent Environments: a Viable Systems Approach (vSa) , 2009 .

[8]  R. W. Lucky,et al.  Free software [Reflections] , 1999 .

[9]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge" in the psychology of computer vision , 1975 .

[10]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[11]  R. J. Howlett,et al.  Innovation through Knowledge Transfer , 2010 .

[12]  Steve Evans,et al.  Succeeding through service innovation : a service perspective for education, research, business and government , 2008 .

[13]  Giancarlo Nota,et al.  Knowledge sharing and cooperation among communities of practices: a possible scenario? , 2011 .

[14]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[15]  Hamideh Afsarmanesh,et al.  Virtual Enterprise Modeling and Support Infrastructures: Applying Multi-agent System Approaches , 2001, EASSS.

[16]  F. Capra.  The Web of Life: A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems , 1996 .

[17]  James C. Spohrer,et al.  Service Science , 2007, Journal of Grid Computing.

[18]  E. Wenger.  Communities of practice and social learning systems”. Organization :. , 2000 .

[19]  A. Holiday.  Knowledge and networks , 2001, Working Together or Pulling Apart?.

[20]  Sergio Barile,et al.  A New Perspective of Systems Complexity in Service Science , 2010 .

[21]  Francesco Polese,et al.  Reflections on Service Systems Boundaries: A Viable Systems Perspective – The Case of the London Borough of Sutton , 2012 .

[22]  Ian Miles,et al.  Innovation and Skills , 2010 .

[23]  Marialuisa Saviano.  La strategia come scelta emergente dal dinamismo ambientale , 1999 .

[24]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[25]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge , 1974 .

[26]  Stafford Beer,et al.  Brain of the Firm: A Development in Management Cybernetics. , 1972 .

[27]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Introducing T-shaped managers. Knowledge management's next generation. , 2001, Harvard business review.

[28]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[29]  Peter F. Drucker,et al.  The New Realities , 1989 .

[30]  Giancarlo Nota,et al.  Modeling Social Influences in a Knowledge Management Network , 2010, Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol..

[31]  D. Schwartz.  Encyclopedia of Knowledge Management , 2005 .

[32]  Robert J. Howlett.  Innovation through Knowledge Transfer 2010 , 2011 .

[33]  Dorothy A. Leonard,et al.  When Sparks Fly: Igniting Creativity in Groups , 1999 .

[34]  W. Duncan.  A GUIDE TO THE PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE , 1996 .

[35]  M. Meehan.  General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications , 1969 .

[36]  Paolo Piciocchi,et al.  An Integrated SS-VSA Analysis of Changing Job Roles , 2010 .

[37]  Sergio Barile,et al.  The dynamic of informative varieties in the processes of decision making , 2009 .

[38]  Michael Stankosky,et al.  Creating the discipline of knowledge management : the latest in university research , 2005 .

[39]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[40]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems , 2000 .

[41]  Vincent M. Ribière.  Chapter 5 – Building a Knowledge-Centered Culture: a Matter of Trust , 2005 .

[42]  Irene C. L. Ng,et al.  Outcome-based contracting: changing the boundaries of B2B customer relationships: an executive briefing , 2009 .

[43]  Gustavo Stubrich.  The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization , 1993 .

[44]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Toward a Science of Service Systems , 2010 .

[45]  Zhigeng Fang,et al.  Editorial: towards service science, engineering and practice , 2007 .

[46]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Innovation and Skills: Future Service Science Education , 2010 .

[47]  Marialuisa Saviano,et al.  Project management as a compass in complex decision making contexts: a viable systems approach , 2011 .

[48]  Sergio Barile,et al.  Foundations of Systems Thinking: The Structure-System Paradigm , 2011 .

[49]  B. Nooteboom.  Cognitive Distance in and Between COP's and Firms: Where do Exploitation and Exploration Take Place, and How are They Connected? , 2006 .

[50]  Paul P. Maglio,et al.  Toward a Science of Service Systems Value and Symbols , 2010 .