Approximate methods in Bayesian point process spatial models

A range of point process models which are commonly used in spatial epidemiology applications for the increased incidence of disease are compared. The models considered vary from approximate methods to an exact method. The approximate methods include the Poisson process model and methods that are based on discretization of the study window. The exact method includes a marked point process model, i.e., the conditional logistic model. Apart from analyzing a real dataset (Lancashire larynx cancer data), a small simulation study is also carried out to examine the ability of these methods to recover known parameter values. The main results are as follows. In estimating the distance effect of larynx cancer incidences from the incinerator, the conditional logistic model and the binomial model for the discretized window perform relatively well. In explaining the spatial heterogeneity, the Poisson model (or the log Gaussian Cox process model) for the discretized window produces the best estimate.

[1]  Yuan Liu,et al.  Evaluation of Bayesian models for focused clustering in health data , 2007 .

[2]  P. Diggle,et al.  Regression Modelling of Disease Risk in Relation to Point Sources , 1997 .

[3]  Contribution to the discussion of “Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations” by H. Rue, S. Martino and N. Chopin , 2009 .

[4]  P. Diggle,et al.  Overview of statistical methods for disease mapping and its relationship to cluster detection , 2001 .

[5]  Mark Berman,et al.  Approximating Point Process Likelihoods with Glim , 1992 .

[6]  Adrian Baddeley,et al.  spatstat: An R Package for Analyzing Spatial Point Patterns , 2005 .

[7]  Peter J. Diggle,et al.  A Conditional Approach to Point Process Modelling of Elevated Risk , 1994 .

[8]  Rasmus Waagepetersen,et al.  Convergence of posteriors for discretized log Gaussian Cox processes , 2004 .

[9]  A. Gelfand,et al.  Gaussian predictive process models for large spatial data sets , 2008, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology.

[10]  A. El-Shaarawi,et al.  Interval estimation for log‐normal mean with applications to water quality , 2007 .

[11]  Andrew B. Lawson,et al.  GLIM and normalising constant models in spatial and directional data analysis , 1992 .

[12]  J. Besag,et al.  Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics , 1991 .

[13]  Mark Berman,et al.  Approximating point process likelihoods with GLIM. , 1993 .

[14]  J. Møller,et al.  Log Gaussian Cox Processes , 1998 .

[15]  P. Diggle.  A point process modeling approach to raised incidence of a rare phenomenon in the vicinity of a prespecified point , 1990 .

[16]  J. Wakefield,et al.  Spatial epidemiology: methods and applications. , 2000 .

[17]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit , 2002 .

[18]  M. Fuentes.  Approximate Likelihood for Large Irregularly Spaced Spatial Data , 2007, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[19]  H. Rue,et al.  Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations , 2009 .

[20]  Andrew B. Lawson,et al.  Disease Mapping with WinBUGS and MLwiN , 2003 .

[21]  Alan E. Gelfand,et al.  Zero-inflated models with application to spatial count data , 2002, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[22]  Peter J. Diggle,et al.  SPLANCS: spatial point pattern analysis code in S-Plus , 1993 .

[23]  A. Lopez,et al.  De tecting Clusters of Diseases with R , 2003 .