Cardiac rehabilitation: health characteristics and socio-economic status among those who do not attend.

BACKGROUND Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is well documented, in randomised trials, to reduce mortality risk after myocardial infarction (MI). Selection of healthy patients for CR is a relatively unexplored problem. Our aims were to identify predictors of CR-attendance and to describe the prognosis as concerns mortality, re-admission and invasive treatment among CR-attendees as compared to CR-non-attendees. METHODS From a cohort of 138 290 persons aged 30-69 years, we identified consecutive MI patients, between 1 April 2000 and 31 March 2002. There were 206 MI patients, who survived until admission, and among the 200 who survived 30 days, 145 (72.5%) attended a comprehensive CR programme. Data were obtained from patient charts and from Danish population registers, and as a result we had no non-participation for the study. RESULTS The 2-year mortality proportions for patients surviving the first 30 days of admission were 2.8 and 21.8% among CR-attendees and CR-non-attendees, respectively (P < 0.0001). Among CR-non-attendees, there was a smaller fraction having an invasive treatment performed as compared with CR-attendees. By multiple logistic regression controlling for age and sex, CR-attendance was associated with chest pain, whereas CR-non-attendance was associated with low gross income, single living and inverted T-wave in the electrocardiogram. CONCLUSION CR attendance rate was 72.5%. Non-attendees have a higher mortality risk, which in part may be attributed to selection of healthy patients. Non-attendees are older and more likely to have atypical symptoms at admission, a low socioeconomic status and to live alone. Special attention is needed to improve CR attendance among such patients.

[1]  O. Faergeman,et al.  Estimating the incidence of the acute coronary syndrome: data from a Danish cohort of 138290 persons , 2007, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[2]  O. Faergeman,et al.  Living alone and atypical clinical presentation are associated with higher mortality in patients with all components of the acute coronary syndrome , 2007, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[3]  O. Faergeman,et al.  Danish singles have a twofold risk of acute coronary syndrome: data from a cohort of 138 290 persons , 2006, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[4]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Long term outcome in patients with silent versus symptomatic ischaemia during dobutamine stress echocardiography , 2005, Heart.

[5]  S. Ebrahim,et al.  Improving uptake and adherence in cardiac rehabilitation: literature review. , 2005, Journal of advanced nursing.

[6]  A. Fraser,et al.  Gender differences in management after acute myocardial infarction: not 'sexism' but a reflection of age at presentation. , 2004, Journal of public health.

[7]  R. V. van Domburg,et al.  The effect of low social support on short-term prognosis in patients following a first myocardial infarction. , 2004, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[8]  J. Killian,et al.  Cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction in the community. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  K. Eagle,et al.  Impact of Combination Evidence-based Medical Therapy on Mortality in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes , 2022 .

[10]  S. Ebrahim,et al.  Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2004, The American journal of medicine.

[11]  D. Berman,et al.  Prognostic relevance of symptoms versus objective evidence of coronary artery disease in diabetic patients. , 2004, European heart journal.

[12]  P. Austin,et al.  Socioeconomic status, service patterns, and perceptions of care among survivors of acute myocardial infarction in Canada. , 2004, JAMA.

[13]  T. Lauritzen,et al.  Quality of lipid‐lowering therapy in patients with ischaemic heart disease: a register‐based study in 3477 patients , 2004, Journal of internal medicine.

[14]  J. Critchley,et al.  Mortality risk reduction associated with smoking cessation in patients with coronary heart disease: a systematic review. , 2003, JAMA.

[15]  E. Perna,et al.  Cardiac troponin T levels are associated with poor short- and long-term prognosis in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. , 2002, American heart journal.

[16]  N. Sharpe,et al.  Factors determining non-attendance at a cardiac rehabilitation programme following myocardial infarction. , 2001, The New Zealand medical journal.

[17]  O. Faergeman A collective failure of medical practice? , 2001, European heart journal.

[18]  S. Ebrahim,et al.  Exercise‐based Rehabilitation for Coronary Heart Disease , 2001, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[19]  Hugo A. Katus,et al.  Myocardial infarction redefined--a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. , 2000, European heart journal.

[20]  R. Holman,et al.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. , 1998 .

[21]  Uk-Prospective-Diabetes-Study-Group Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33) , 1998, The Lancet.

[22]  L. Wilhelmsen,et al.  “Nonspecific” chest pain associated with high long‐term mortality: Results from the primary prevention study in göteborg, sweden , 1998, Clinical cardiology.

[23]  W. Rosamond,et al.  Predictors of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation utilization: the Minnesota Heart Surgery Registry. , 1998, Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation.

[24]  C. Viscoli,et al.  Functional Recovery after Myocardial Infarction in Men: The Independent Effects of Social Class , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[25]  J Herlitz,et al.  Effects of insulin treatment on cause-specific one-year mortality and morbidity in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction. DIGAMI Study Group. Diabetes Insulin-Glucose in Acute Myocardial Infarction. , 1996, European heart journal.

[26]  K. Lee,et al.  Importance of baseline functional and socioeconomic factors for participation in cardiac rehabilitation. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.

[27]  Lippincott Williams Wilkins,et al.  1993 guidelines for the management of mild hypertension. Memorandum from a World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension meeting. Guidelines Subcommittee of the WHO/ISH Mild Hypertension Liaison Committee. , 1993, Hypertension.

[28]  J. Buring,et al.  An overview of randomized trials of rehabilitation with exercise after myocardial infarction. , 1989, Circulation.

[29]  G. Hillis,et al.  Biochemical and clinical predictors of long-term outcome in patients with nonspecific chest pain and nondiagnostic electrocardiograms. , 2003, American heart journal.

[30]  David R. Wood,et al.  Lifestyle and risk factor management and use of drug therapies in coronary patients from 15 countries; principal results from EUROASPIRE II Euro Heart Survey Programme. , 2001, European heart journal.

[31]  Bruce Neal,et al.  1999 World Health Organization-International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension. Guidelines Subcommittee. , 1999, Journal of hypertension.

[32]  M. Moser A critique of the world health organization-international society of hypertension guidelines for the management of hypertension , 1999 .