Resource-related diversification and its measures – review of empirical results

Resource-relatedness is considered to be the answer to the criticism associated with traditional product and market based measures of diversification. However, the empirical support of resource-related diversification has not been investigated yet. Therefore, the author conducts a review of 32 statistical tests derived from 18 studies, and finds substantial support. Nevertheless, a dominant measurement approach has not evolved yet. Researchers focus on specific dimensions of resource-relatedness and they apply different indicators and measurement approaches. The author concludes that a measure satisfying the multidimensionality of resource-relatedness and that consensus on a measurement approach are significant for the advancement of research on diversification.

[1]  Ansgar Richter,et al.  Strategy and Structure , 2013 .

[2]  Constantinos C. Markides,et al.  Corporate Diversification And Organizational Structure: A Resource-Based View , 1996 .

[3]  M. Wiersema,et al.  Portfolio Interrelationships and Financial Performance in the Context of European Firms , 2003 .

[4]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses). , 1997, BMJ.

[5]  R. Rumelt,et al.  Diversification strategy and profitability , 1982 .

[6]  Richard A. D'Aveni,et al.  From corporate strategy to business-level advantage: Relatedness as resource congruence , 2004 .

[7]  Vasudevan Ramanujam,et al.  Research on corporate diversification: A synthesis , 1989 .

[8]  Margaret A. Peteraf The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[9]  H. Ansoff Corporate strategy : an analytic approach to business policy for growth and expansion , 1965 .

[10]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  Curvilinearity in the diversification–performance linkage: an examination of over three decades of research , 2000 .

[11]  R. Rumelt Strategy, structure, and economic performance , 1974 .

[12]  Harris Cooper,et al.  Integrating Research: A Guide for Literature Reviews , 1989 .

[13]  Margarethe F. Wiersema,et al.  The measurement of corporate portfolio strategy: analysis of the content validity of related diversification indexes , 2003 .

[14]  Robert M. Grant,et al.  Performance differences between the wrigley/rumelt strategic categories , 1988 .

[15]  Fred Luthans,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Organizational Behavior Modification on Task Performance, 1975–95 , 1997 .

[16]  J. Harrison,et al.  Manufacturing-based relatedness, synergy, and coordination , 1999 .

[17]  Vasudevan Ramanujam,et al.  Diversification and Performance: A Reexamination using A New Two-Dimensional Conceptualization of Diversity in Firms , 1987 .

[18]  Anne Y. Ilinitch,et al.  Operationalizing and testing Galbraith's center of gravity theory , 1995 .

[19]  Sea Jin Chang,et al.  AN EVOLUTIONARY PERSPECTIVE ON DIVERSIFICATION AND CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING: ENTRY, EXIT, AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE DURING 1981–89 , 1996 .

[20]  R. Bettis Performance differences in related and unrelated diversified firms , 1981 .

[21]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings , 1991 .

[22]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Knowledge relatedness and the performance of multibusiness firms , 2005 .

[23]  J. Robins,et al.  A resource‐based approach to the multibusiness firm: Empirical analysis of portfolio interrelationships and corporate financial performance , 1995 .

[24]  Moshe Farjoun,et al.  The independent and joint effects of the skill and physical bases of relatedness in diversification , 1998 .

[25]  Praveen R. Nayyar,et al.  On the measurement of corporate diversification strategy: Evidence from large U.S. service firms , 1992 .

[26]  J. L. Stimpert,et al.  IN THE EYES OF THE BEHOLDER: CONCEPTUALIZATIONS OF RELATEDNESS HELD BY THE MANAGERS OF LARGE DIVERSIFIED FIRMS , 1997 .

[27]  A. Pehrsson Business relatedness and performance : a study of managerial perceptions , 2006 .

[28]  Fiorenzo Franceschini,et al.  Measurements, evaluations and preferences: A scheme of classification according to the representational theory , 2006 .

[29]  P. Williamson,et al.  Related diversification, core competences and corporate performance , 2007 .

[30]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[31]  K. Palepu Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure , 1985 .

[32]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[33]  Moshe Farjoun Beyond Industry Boundaries: Human Expertise, Diversification and Resource-Related Industry Groups , 1994 .

[34]  John A. Pearce,et al.  Business unit relatedness and performance: A look at the pulp and paper industry , 1992 .

[35]  Birger Wernerfelt,et al.  The link between resources and type of diversification: Theory and evidence , 1991 .

[36]  Wenpin Tsai Social capital, strategic relatedness and the formation of intraorganizational linkages , 2000 .

[37]  Douglas J. Miller Technological diversity, related diversification, and firm performance , 2006 .

[38]  Thomas H. Brush PREDICTED CHANGE IN OPERATIONAL SYNERGY AND POST‐ACQUISITION PERFORMANCE OF ACQUIRED BUSINESSES , 1996 .

[39]  C. Campbell-Hunt What have we learned about generic competitive strategy? A meta‐analysis , 2000 .

[40]  Hüseyin Tanriverdi,et al.  Performance Effects of Information Technology Synergies in Multibusiness Firms , 2006, MIS Q..

[41]  B. Silverman Technological Resources and the Direction of Corporate Diversification: Toward an Integration of the Resource-Based View and Transaction Cost Economics , 1998 .

[42]  R. David,et al.  A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics , 2004 .

[43]  Ernest H. Hall,et al.  Resource Allocation as an Outcropping of Strategic Consistency: Performance Implications , 1993 .

[44]  Michael Meskon,et al.  The resource-based theory of competitive advantage : implications for strategy formulation , 2018 .

[45]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .