A Sequential Phase 2b Trial Design for Evaluating Vaccine Efficacy and Immune Correlates for Multiple HIV Vaccine Regimens

Five preventative HIV vaccine efficacy trials have been conducted over the last 12 years, all of which evaluated vaccine efficacy (VE) to prevent HIV infection for a single vaccine regimen versus placebo. Now that one of these trials has supported partial VE of a prime-boost vaccine regimen, there is interest in conducting efficacy trials that simultaneously evaluate multiple prime-boost vaccine regimens against a shared placebo group in the same geographic region, for accelerating the pace of vaccine development. This article proposes such a design, which has main objectives (1) to evaluate VE of each regimen versus placebo against HIV exposures occurring near the time of the immunizations; (2) to evaluate durability of VE for each vaccine regimen showing reliable evidence for positive VE; (3) to expeditiously evaluate the immune correlates of protection if any vaccine regimen shows reliable evidence for positive VE; and (4) to compare VE among the vaccine regimens. The design uses sequential monitoring for the events of vaccine harm, non-efficacy, and high efficacy, selected to weed out poor vaccines as rapidly as possible while guarding against prematurely weeding out a vaccine that does not confer efficacy until most of the immunizations are received. The evaluation of the design shows that testing multiple vaccine regimens is important for providing a well-powered assessment of the correlation of vaccine-induced immune responses with HIV infection, and is critically important for providing a reasonably powered assessment of the value of identified correlates as surrogate endpoints for HIV infection.

[1]  Bryan Langholz,et al.  Exposure Stratified Case-Cohort Designs , 2000, Lifetime data analysis.

[2]  R. Gray,et al.  A general inefficacy interim monitoring rule for randomized clinical trials , 2010, Clinical trials.

[3]  Peter B Gilbert,et al.  ASSESSING SURROGATE ENDPOINTS IN VACCINE TRIALS WITH CASE-COHORT SAMPLING AND THE COX MODEL. , 2008, The annals of applied statistics.

[4]  S. Plotkin,et al.  Vaccines: correlates of vaccine-induced immunity. , 2008, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[5]  T. Fleming,et al.  Adaptive Methods: Telling “The Rest of the Story” , 2010, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[6]  M. Davidian,et al.  Covariate adjustment for two‐sample treatment comparisons in randomized clinical trials: A principled yet flexible approach , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  S. Pocock Group sequential methods in the design and analysis of clinical trials , 1977 .

[8]  Michael G Hudgens,et al.  Evaluating Candidate Principal Surrogate Endpoints , 2008, Biometrics.

[9]  T. Lumley,et al.  Sensitivity analyses comparing time-to-event outcomes only existing in a subset selected post-randomization, conditional on covariates, with application to HIV vaccine trials , 2007 .

[10]  Michael R Kosorok,et al.  Simultaneous Inferences on the Contrast of Two Hazard Functions with Censored Observations , 2002, Biometrics.

[11]  Anastasios A. Tsiatis,et al.  Improving the efficiency of the log-rank test using auxiliary covariates , 2008 .

[12]  P. Gilbert,et al.  Recombinant gp120 Vaccine-Induced Antibodies Inhibit Clinical Strains of HIV-1 in the Presence of Fc Receptor-Bearing Effector Cells and Correlate Inversely with HIV Infection Rate1 , 2007, The Journal of Immunology.

[13]  Dean Follmann,et al.  Augmented Designs to Assess Immune Response in Vaccine Trials , 2006, Biometrics.

[14]  Thomas R Fleming,et al.  Standard versus adaptive monitoring procedures: a commentary , 2006, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  Alan S. Perelson,et al.  The first T cell response to transmitted/founder virus contributes to the control of acute viremia in HIV-1 infection , 2009, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[16]  D. Siegmund Sequential Analysis: Tests and Confidence Intervals , 1985 .

[17]  S. Buchbinder,et al.  Overview of STEP and Phambili trial results: two phase IIb test-of-concept studies investigating the efficacy of MRK adenovirus type 5 gag/pol/nef subtype B HIV vaccine , 2010, Current opinion in HIV and AIDS.

[18]  Joseph F Heyse,et al.  Evaluating the safety of a rotavirus vaccine: the REST of the story , 2008, Clinical trials.

[19]  Marie Davidian,et al.  Improving Efficiency of Inferences in Randomized Clinical Trials Using Auxiliary Covariates , 2008, Biometrics.

[20]  J. Robins,et al.  Identifiability and Exchangeability for Direct and Indirect Effects , 1992, Epidemiology.

[21]  Roderick J. A. Little,et al.  Adjusting for Nonignorable Drop-Out Using Semiparametric Nonresponse Models: Comment , 1999 .

[22]  Punnee Pitisuttithum,et al.  Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy trial of a bivalent recombinant glycoprotein 120 HIV-1 vaccine among injection drug users in Bangkok, Thailand. , 2006, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[23]  P. Rosenbaum The Consequences of Adjustment for a Concomitant Variable that Has Been Affected by the Treatment , 1984 .

[24]  R. Betensky Construction of a continuous stopping boundary from an alpha spending function. , 1998, Biometrics.

[25]  S. Nolte,et al.  Prevention of HIV infection in women. , 1993, Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN.

[26]  S. Self,et al.  Analytic Insights Into the Population Level Impact of Imperfect Prophylactic HIV Vaccines , 2007, Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes.

[27]  P A Lachenbruch,et al.  Intent-to-treat analysis and preventive vaccine efficacy. , 2000, Vaccine.

[28]  K. K. Lan,et al.  Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials , 1983 .

[29]  G. Churchyard,et al.  P15-08. Did unblinding affect HIV risk behaviour and risk perception in the HVTN503/Phambili study? , 2009, Retrovirology.

[30]  Kenneth H Mayer,et al.  Placebo-controlled phase 3 trial of a recombinant glycoprotein 120 vaccine to prevent HIV-1 infection. , 2005, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[31]  Scott S Emerson,et al.  Issues in the use of adaptive clinical trial designs , 2006, Statistics in medicine.

[32]  J. Robins,et al.  Adjusting for Nonignorable Drop-Out Using Semiparametric Nonresponse Models , 1999 .

[33]  David L. DeMets,et al.  Data Monitoring Committees in Clinical Trials: A Practical Perspective , 2002 .

[34]  R. Anderson,et al.  Low-efficacy HIV vaccines: potential for community-based intervention programmes , 1996, The Lancet.

[35]  J. Swinton,et al.  Potential impact of low efficacy HIV-1 vaccines in populations with high rates of infection , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  M J van der Laan,et al.  Covariate adjustment in randomized trials with binary outcomes: Targeted maximum likelihood estimation , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[37]  N. Binding,et al.  Hepatitis A and hepatitis B vaccinations: immunogenicity of combined vaccine and of simultaneously or separately applied single vaccines. , 2000, Vaccine.

[38]  Devan V Mehrotra,et al.  Efficacy assessment of a cell-mediated immunity HIV-1 vaccine (the Step Study): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, test-of-concept trial , 2008, The Lancet.

[39]  P. O'Brien,et al.  A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. , 1979, Biometrics.

[40]  Jerome H. Kim,et al.  Vaccination with ALVAC and AIDSVAX to prevent HIV-1 infection in Thailand. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[41]  D. Rubin,et al.  Principal Stratification in Causal Inference , 2002, Biometrics.

[42]  Peter B Gilbert,et al.  Evaluating a surrogate endpoint at three levels, with application to vaccine development , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[43]  T R Fleming,et al.  Symmetric group sequential test designs. , 1989, Biometrics.

[44]  J. Lieberman,et al.  A Sound Rationale Needed for Phase III HIV-1 Vaccine Trials , 2004, Science.

[45]  Peter B Gilbert,et al.  A framework for assessing immunological correlates of protection in vaccine trials. , 2007, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[46]  Peter B. Gilbert,et al.  Increasing the Efficiency of Prevention Trials by Incorporating Baseline Covariates , 2010, Statistical communications in infectious diseases.

[47]  Ian W McKeague,et al.  The 2-sample problem for failure rates depending on a continuous mark: an application to vaccine efficacy. , 2007, Biostatistics.

[48]  Julian Wolfson,et al.  Statistical Identifiability and the Surrogate Endpoint Problem, with Application to Vaccine Trials , 2010, Biometrics.