Seeking richer descriptions of learners' sustainability attributes and learning needs

– The aim of this paper is to respond to calls for higher education institutions to address sustainability within the curriculum. Institutions that aim to graduate citizens with prescribed attributes relevant to sustainability may need to develop teaching and learning support‐programmes appropriate to the varied nature of students' worldviews., – The research described here used the NEP (Revised New Ecological Paradigm) and statistical cluster‐analysis to explore if individuals within cohorts of students could reasonably be clustered into subgroups with identified sustainability attributes relevant to the design of learner‐support programmes., – All seven programme cohorts in one institution's annual intake clustered into three subgroups with identifiable attributes., – The results are discussed in relation to how post‐compulsory education institutions can define the sustainability characteristics of their students and to the pedagogic literature that addresses diversity in student groups., – The approach may help higher education institutions better understand the needs of individual students within large groups and to develop appropriate support programmes for students with similar attributes and needs.

[1]  William Scott,et al.  Higher education and ESD in England: a critical commentary on recent initiatives , 2008 .

[2]  Pat Strauss,et al.  Group assessments: dilemmas facing lecturers in multicultural tertiary classrooms , 2007 .

[3]  Kerry Shephard Higher education for sustainability: seeking affective learning outcomes , 2008 .

[4]  Samuel Mann,et al.  Benchmarking the environmental values and attitudes of students in New Zealand's post‐compulsory education , 2009 .

[5]  David Trafimow,et al.  Some Tests of the Distinction between Cognitive and Affective Beliefs , 1998 .

[6]  Karsten Schnack,et al.  The action competence approach in environmental education , 1997 .

[7]  R. Dunlap The New Environmental Paradigm Scale: From Marginality to Worldwide Use , 2008 .

[8]  T. Milfont,et al.  The use (and abuse) of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last 30 years: A meta-analysis , 2010 .

[9]  K. Bosselmann University and Sustainability: compatible agendas? , 2001 .

[10]  R. Dunlap,et al.  THE NEW ENVIRONMENTAL PARADIGM: 5 PROPOSED MEASURING INSTRUMENT AND PRELIMINARY RESULTS , 1978 .

[11]  M. Polonsky,et al.  Environmental Attitudes and Their Relation to the Dominant Social Paradigm among University Students in New Zealand and Australia , 2005 .

[12]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale , 2000 .

[13]  Sally Brown,et al.  Grasping the TLRP nettle: preliminary analysis and some enduring issues surrounding the improvement of learning outcomes , 2005 .

[14]  R. Dunlap,et al.  The “New Environmental Paradigm” , 1978 .

[15]  M. Warren,et al.  Revolutions and second‐best solutions: education for sustainable development in higher education , 2009 .

[16]  Samuel Mann,et al.  Comparing different measures of affective attributes relating to sustainability , 2011 .

[17]  R. Dunn,et al.  Teaching Law Students Through Individual Learning Styles , 2008 .

[18]  M. Fishbein A theory of reasoned action: some applications and implications. , 1980, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.