Optimization under uncertainty of sheet-metal-forming processes by the finite element method

Abstract In this paper, a novel method is proposed for the optimization, by finite element method (FEM) analysis, of the design variables of sheet-metal-forming processes. The method is useful when one or more non-controllable process parameters can be modelled as a random variable that introduces a degree of uncertainty into a process solution or, in other words, when the effect of any combination of design variables on the process response is disturbed by the non-controllable effect of a random vector of parameters. The method is particularly suited to problems with large FEM computational times, small process window, and large non-uniform variance of results. The process window is the region in the space of the design variables where the failure probability (i.e. the probability that wrinkling or excessive thinning occur) is lower than a given α value. The problem is formulated as the minimization of a cost function, subject to a reliability constraint. The cost function is indirectly optimized through a ‘metamodel’, built by ‘Kriging’ interpolation. The reliability, i.e. the failure probability, is assessed by a binary logistic regression analysis of the simulation results. The method is described and applied to a real production problem, a flexforming operation with large probability of failure by wrinkling, where the fluid pressure curve must be optimized. This particular industrial example has been chosen because several solutions found by process engineers did not prove to be robust in respect of a random variation in the coefficient of friction. A simple and conventional design approach would lead to an unreliable solution.

[1]  Bernt J. Leira,et al.  Reliability-based analysis of a stretch-bending process for aluminium extrusions , 1999 .

[2]  Hoon Huh,et al.  Optimum process design in sheet-metal forming with finite element analysis , 2000 .

[3]  Nielen Stander,et al.  Analyzing ' Noisy ' Structural Problems with LS-OPT : Probabilistic and Deterministic Fundamentals , 2003 .

[4]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[5]  Tapabrata Ray,et al.  Optimal process design of sheet metal forming for minimum springback via an integrated neural network evolutionary algorithm , 2004 .

[6]  A. Delamézière,et al.  Faisabilité en emboutissage : optimisation du matériau par surface de réponse , 2002 .

[7]  Taylan Altan,et al.  Optimization of blank dimensions to reduce springback in the flexforming process , 2004 .

[8]  Jerzy Rojek,et al.  Deterministic and stochastic analysis of failure in sheet metal forming operations , 2004 .

[9]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  On the Use of Statistics in Design and the Implications for Deterministic Computer Experiments , 1997 .

[10]  P. Villon,et al.  Moving least squares response surface approximation: Formulation and metal forming applications , 2005 .

[11]  Nikolaos V. Sahinidis,et al.  Optimization under uncertainty: state-of-the-art and opportunities , 2004, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[12]  Eiji Nakamachi,et al.  Development of optimum process design system for sheet fabrication using response surface method , 2003 .

[13]  Tomas Jansson,et al.  Optimization of Draw-In for an Automotive Sheet Metal Part An evaluation using surrogate models and response surfaces , 2005 .

[14]  J. Huetink,et al.  Metamodelling techniques for the optimisation of metal forming processes , 2005 .

[15]  Michał Kleiber,et al.  Reliability assessment for sheet metal forming operations , 2002 .

[16]  Søren Nymand Lophaven,et al.  DACE - A Matlab Kriging Toolbox , 2002 .

[17]  Wei Chen,et al.  Model Validation via Uncertainty Propagation Using Response Surface Models , 2002, Volume 2: 28th Design Automation Conference.

[18]  Hakim Naceur,et al.  Response Surface Methodology for the Design of Sheet Metal Forming Parameters to Control Springback Effects using the Inverse Approach , 2004 .

[19]  J. Jakumeit,et al.  Parameter optimization of the sheet metal forming process using an iterative parallel Kriging algorithm , 2005 .

[20]  R. Rackwitz Reliability analysis—a review and some perspectives , 2001 .

[21]  Michał Kleiber,et al.  Response surface method for probabilistic assessment of metal forming failures , 2004 .

[22]  Wei Chen,et al.  Sequential Optimization and Reliability Assessment Method for Metal Forming Processes , 2004 .

[23]  A. Agresti An introduction to categorical data analysis , 1997 .