Case-based learning in virtual groups – collaborative problem solving activities and learning outcomes in a virtual professional training course

This article analyzes the collaborative problem solving activities and learning outcomes of five groups that worked on two different complex cases in a virtual professional training course. In this asynchronous virtual learning environment, all knowledge management content was delivered virtually and collaboration took place through forums. To measure the effects of the problem solving activities, learners' contributions were analyzed with respect to four different problem solving activities: Two content-specific problem solving activities, namely gathering information and developing a solution, and two coordination-specific problem solving activities, namely planning the common approach and steering the interaction process. Results indicated that the learning process was dominated by two central activities: developing a solution and steering the interaction process. Furthermore, the results indicated that the groups with the more complex case used more overall problem solving activities than the groups with the less complex case. There was also a greater range of learning outcomes for learners with the more complex case than for learners with the less complex case. Finally, the number of overall problem solving activities for most of the successful groups was higher than for the less successful groups. Additionally, the more successful groups used more coordination-specific activities than content-specific activities during the problem solving process.

[1]  Brigitte Maier,et al.  Supporting Collaboration and Communication in Videoconferences , 2010 .

[2]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and the Use of Technology , 2007 .

[3]  Bernhard Ertl,et al.  E-Collaborative Knowledge Construction: Learning from Computer-Supported and Virtual Environments , 2010 .

[4]  Pa¨ivi Ha¨kkinen Collaborative learning in networked environments: Interaction through shared workspaces and communication tools , 2003 .

[5]  Absatz Computer Support for Collaborative Learning Environments , 2005 .

[6]  Joachim Stempfle,et al.  Kommunikation und Problemlösen in Gruppen: eine Prozessanalyse , 2002 .

[7]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperative learning : increasing college faculty instructional productivity , 1991 .

[8]  R. Slavin Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice , 1990 .

[9]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Chapter 1 (Introduction) What do you mean by 'collaborative learning'? , 1999 .

[10]  Dietrich Dörner,et al.  Die Logik des Misslingens : strategisches Denken in komplexen Situationen , 1989 .

[11]  Manu Kapur,et al.  Examining the effect of problem type in a synchronous computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment , 2007 .

[12]  Edward A. Mabry,et al.  Small Group Interaction and Outcome Correlates for Structured and Unstructured Tasks , 1990 .

[13]  Merrilee H. Salmon,et al.  Reasoning in Conversation , 1993 .

[14]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .

[15]  John R. Hayes,et al.  The Complete Problem Solver , 1981 .

[16]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Lernen mit Computernetzen aus konstruktivistischer Perspektive , 1997 .

[17]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Sociocognition in Work Groups , 1993 .

[18]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Blended Learning: Forschungsfragen und Perspektiven , 2006 .

[19]  M. Segers,et al.  Effects of problem-based learning: a meta- analysis , 2003 .

[20]  Alexander Renkl,et al.  Instructional effects in complex learning: Do objective and subjective learning outcomes converge? , 1998 .

[21]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  Analysis of design projects , 1999 .

[22]  M. Segers,et al.  Effects of problem-based learning: a meta- analysis , 2003 .

[23]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[24]  E. Cohen Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups , 1994 .

[25]  Armin Weinberger,et al.  Scripts for Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning , 2003 .

[26]  Gabriele Krause Paechter, M. (2003). Wissenskommunikation, Kooperation und Lernen in virtuellen Gruppen , 2004 .

[27]  Anthonius J.M. de Jong,et al.  Types and qualities of knowledge , 1993 .

[28]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Collaborative learning in virtual seminars: analyzing learning processes and learning outcomes , 2009, CSCL.