Spatial Judgments in Impossible Spaces Preserve Important Relative Information

In virtual reality (VR), Impossible Spaces allow rooms to overlap each other in physical space, enabling developers to better utilize the limited space available for VR systems. Prior work has explored detect thresholds for an impossible spaces, but little work has considered how impossible spaces affect users’ understandings of spatial relationships within virtual environments. We present a study evaluating how impossible spaces affected participants’ judgments of a room’s width, and how this was impacted by whether participants considered each room individually, or within the context of the entire space. Participants’ judgments of single rooms was not impacted by being in an impossible space, however judgments were significantly smaller when considering an impossible space as a whole. Even so, participants’ judgments preserved the respective ratio between overlapping rooms, indicating that the relative sizes of different rooms is preserved in impossible spaces. This suggests that while absolute spatial information may be disrupted by impossible spaces, important relative information can be preserved. However, it is not yet clear how much of this effect can be attributed to lower-level perception and higher-level cognition.

[1]  Mary C. Whitton,et al.  An evaluation of navigational ability comparing Redirected Free Exploration with Distractors to Walking-in-Place and joystick locomotio interfaces , 2011, 2011 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference.

[2]  Andrew Robb,et al.  Perception of Spatial Relationships in Impossible Spaces , 2019, SAP.

[3]  Lauren E. Buck,et al.  How Video Game Locomotion Methods Affect Navigation in Virtual Environments , 2019, SAP.

[4]  Roy A. Ruddle,et al.  The benefits of using a walking interface to navigate virtual environments , 2009, TCHI.

[5]  Eike Langbehn,et al.  Evaluation of Locomotion Techniques for Room-Scale VR: Joystick, Teleportation, and Redirected Walking , 2018, VRIC.

[6]  Hannes Kaufmann,et al.  Flexible spaces: Dynamic layout generation for infinite walking in virtual environments , 2013, 2013 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI).

[7]  Sabarish V. Babu,et al.  Evaluation of the Cognitive Effects of Travel Technique in Complex Real and Virtual Environments , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[8]  Mark T. Bolas,et al.  Impossible Spaces: Maximizing Natural Walking in Virtual Environments with Self-Overlapping Architecture , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[9]  Hannes Kaufmann,et al.  Towards efficient spatial compression in self-overlapping virtual environments , 2017, 2017 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI).

[10]  Sabarish V. Babu,et al.  Comparison of path visualizations and cognitive measures relative to travel technique in a virtual environment , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[11]  C. Ferguson An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. , 2009 .

[12]  Bodo Winter,et al.  Linear models and linear mixed effects models in R with linguistic applications , 2013, ArXiv.

[13]  Bernhard E. Riecke,et al.  Can physical motions prevent disorientation in naturalistic VR? , 2012, 2012 IEEE Virtual Reality Workshops (VRW).

[14]  B. Tversky Distortions in memory for maps , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  Albert C. Stevens,et al.  Distortions in judged spatial relations , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  Hannes Kaufmann,et al.  Influence of Path Complexity on Spatial Overlap Perception in Virtual Environments , 2015, ICAT-EGVE.

[17]  Zachary Wartell,et al.  Leveraging change blindness for redirection in virtual environments , 2011, 2011 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference.

[18]  Martin Kraus,et al.  Navigating Procedurally Generated Overt Self-overlapping Environments in VR , 2019, ArtsIT/DLI.

[19]  Rajiv V. Dubey,et al.  Point & Teleport Locomotion Technique for Virtual Reality , 2016, CHI PLAY.

[20]  Mark T. Bolas,et al.  Effects of redirection on spatial orientation in real and virtual environments , 2011, 2011 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI).

[21]  David Parsons,et al.  The Effects of Teleportation on Recollection of the Structure of a Virtual World , 2009, EGVE/ICAT/EuroVR.

[22]  Jonathan W. Kelly,et al.  Spatial cognitive implications of teleporting through virtual environments. , 2020, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[23]  Simon Lessels,et al.  For Efficient Navigational Search, Humans Require Full Physical Movement, but Not a Rich Visual Scene , 2006, Psychological science.

[24]  Byron C. Jaeger,et al.  An R2 statistic for fixed effects in the generalized linear mixed model , 2017 .

[25]  Jonathan D. Ericson,et al.  Wormholes in virtual space: From cognitive maps to cognitive graphs , 2017, Cognition.

[26]  G. Bower,et al.  Inconsistency in spatial knowledge , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[27]  Mary C. Whitton,et al.  15 Years of Research on Redirected Walking in Immersive Virtual Environments , 2018, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[28]  Jonathan W. Kelly,et al.  Teleporting through virtual environments: Effects of path scale and environment scale on spatial updating , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[29]  J. Jonides,et al.  Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[30]  Mary C. Whitton,et al.  Walking > walking-in-place > flying, in virtual environments , 1999, SIGGRAPH.