Ergonomic Redesign of an Industrial Control Panel

Operator's role in industrial control centers takes place in time, which is one of the most important determinants of whether an expected action is going to be successful or not. In certain situations, due to the complex nature of the work, the existing interfaces and already prepared procedures do not meet the dynamic requirements of operator's cognitive demands, making the control tasks unnecessarily difficult. This study was conducted to identify ergonomic issues with a specific industrial control panel, and redesign its layout and elements to enhance its usability. Task and link analysis methodologies were implemented. All essential functions and supporting operations were identified at the required trivial levels. Next, the weight of any possible link between the elements of the panel was computed as a composite index of frequency and importance. Finally, all components were rearranged within a new layout, and a computerized mockup was generated. A total of 8 primary tasks was identified, including 4 system failure handling tasks, switching between manual and automated modes, and 3 types of routine vigilance and control tasks. These tasks were broken down into 28 functions and 145 supporting operations, accordingly. Higher link values were observed between hand rest position and 2 elements. Also, 6 other components showed robust linkages. In conclusion, computer modeling can reduce the likelihood of accidents and near misses in industrial control rooms by considering the operators' misperception or mental burden and correcting poor design of the panels and inappropriate task allocation.

[1]  Isaac José Antonio Luquetti dos Santos,et al.  The use of questionnaire and virtual reality in the verification of the human factors issues in the design of nuclear control desk , 2009 .

[2]  Changxu Wu,et al.  Improved link analysis method for user interface design – modified link table and optimisation-based algorithm , 2010, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[3]  Xiaojun Wu,et al.  Validation of “alarm bar” alternative interface for digital control panel design: A preliminary experimental study , 2016 .

[4]  Deepak Kumar Kushwaha,et al.  Ergonomic assessment and workstation design of shipping crane cabin in steel industry , 2016 .

[5]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  Human Factors in the Design and Evaluation of Central Control Room Operations , 2009 .

[6]  Andrew Shepherd,et al.  Hierarchical task analysis , 2001 .

[7]  Andreas Lumbe Aas,et al.  A case study of ISO 11064 in control centre design in the Norwegian petroleum industry. , 2010, Applied ergonomics.

[8]  E. N. Corlett,et al.  Evaluation of Human Work , 2005 .

[9]  Balbir S. Dhillon,et al.  Human Reliability, Error, and Human Factors in Power Generation , 2014 .

[10]  Youchao Sun,et al.  A Framework for Ergonomics Design of Transport Category Airplane Cockpit , 2014 .

[11]  Leandro Barbosa S. Gatto,et al.  Virtual simulation of a nuclear power plant's control room as a tool for ergonomic evaluation , 2013 .

[12]  Nigel Corlett,et al.  Evaluation of Human Work, 3rd Edition , 2005 .

[13]  Yili Liu,et al.  Introduction to Human Factors Engineering (2nd Edition) , 2003 .

[14]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  An introduction to human factors engineering , 1997 .

[15]  James M. LeBreton,et al.  The dark side of personality at work , 2014 .

[16]  Isaac José Antonio Luquetti dos Santos,et al.  Using participatory ergonomics to improve nuclear equipment design. , 2011 .

[17]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  All at sea: An ergonomic analysis of oil production platform control rooms , 2014 .