Multi-detector row CT pulmonary angiography: comparison of standard-dose and simulated low-dose techniques.

PURPOSE To compare standard-dose and simulated low-dose multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) pulmonary angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS The institutional review board approved the study protocol and waived patient informed consent because the study was based on existing data. Raw data from 21 CT scans obtained at 90 mAs (effective) in 11 women and 10 men aged 25-74 years (mean, 52 years) that showed at least one filling defect within a pulmonary artery were used to simulate CT pulmonary angiography with reduced radiation doses, at 60, 40, 20, and 10 mAs. Three independent readers coded each central and segmental pulmonary artery twice as positive, negative, or inconclusive for presence of a filling defect. The second reading of images obtained with 90 mAs was considered the reference standard. The potential dependence of results on reader, radiation dose, and/or pulmonary artery segment was investigated with analysis of variance. Positive and negative consistent values were calculated for standard-dose scans and simulated low-dose scans in the first reading session. The branching order of the artery with the most distal filling defect was recorded. The quality of intravascular contrast at each tube current-time product setting was scored on a five-point scale. Interreader agreement was investigated with kappa statistics. RESULTS The frequencies of positive and inconclusive results (P = .21 and .08, respectively), positive and negative consistent values (P = .19 and .34, respectively), and branching order of the most distal artery with a filling defect (P = .41) did not depend on the radiation dose. Values for inter- and intrareader agreement were higher for central arterial segments than for branch arteries but were not influenced by dose reduction, regardless of arterial segment. The quality of intravascular contrast was not significantly changed when the tube current-time product was reduced from 90 to 40 mAs (P = .10 to >.99). CONCLUSION The evaluated parameters remained stable when tube current-time product was reduced from 90 (effective) to 10 (simulated) mAs at multi-detector row CT pulmonary angiography.

[1]  J. Caniego,et al.  Prospective comparison of helical CT with angiography in pulmonary embolism: global and selective vascular territory analysis. Interobserver agreement , 2003, European Radiology.

[2]  G. Kovacs,et al.  Excluding Pulmonary Embolism at the Bedside without Diagnostic Imaging: Management of Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Presenting to the Emergency Department by Using a Simple Clinical Model and d-dimer , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  C. Jackson,et al.  Correlated Applied Anatomy of the Bronchial Tree and Lungs With a System of Nomenclature , 1943 .

[4]  B Ghaye,et al.  Peripheral pulmonary arteries: how far in the lung does multi-detector row spiral CT allow analysis? , 2001, Radiology.

[5]  A. Leung,et al.  Simulated dose reduction in conventional chest CT: validation study. , 1997, Radiology.

[6]  Smita Patel,et al.  Pulmonary embolism: optimization of small pulmonary artery visualization at multi-detector row CT. , 2003, Radiology.

[7]  N. Müller,et al.  Low-dose high-resolution CT of lung parenchyma. , 1991, Radiology.

[8]  P. Shrimpton,et al.  Diagnostic medical exposures in the U.K. , 1999, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[9]  W Huda,et al.  An approach for the estimation of effective radiation dose at CT in pediatric patients. , 1997, Radiology.

[10]  J. Remy,et al.  Peripheral pulmonary arteries: optimization of the spiral CT acquisition protocol. , 1997, Radiology.

[11]  Radiation dose in helical CT for detection of pulmonary embolism , 2003, European Radiology.

[12]  K S Lee,et al.  CT of the chest: minimal tube current required for good image quality with the least radiation dose. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  H. Hatabu,et al.  Pulmonary embolism in pregnant patients: a survey of practices and policies for CT pulmonary angiography. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  W Huda,et al.  Radiation exposure and image quality in chest CT examinations. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  Martine Remy-Jardin,et al.  Pulmonary embolus imaging with multislice CT. , 2003, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[16]  W. Teeuwisse,et al.  Radiation exposure of multi-row detector spiral computed tomography of the pulmonary arteries: comparison with digital subtraction pulmonary angiography , 2003, European Radiology.

[17]  P. Silverman,et al.  Common terminology for single and multislice helical CT. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  M Mahesh,et al.  Dose and pitch relationship for a particular multislice CT scanner. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  D. Musset,et al.  Comparison of doses for pulmonary embolism detection with helical CT and pulmonary angiography , 2003, European Radiology.

[20]  P. Grenier,et al.  Diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicentre outcome study , 2002, The Lancet.

[21]  S. Golding,et al.  Commentary. Radiation dose in CT: are we meeting the challenge? , 2002, The British journal of radiology.