Integrated detection of disruption scenarios, the ripple effect dispersal and recovery paths in supply chains

The studies on supply chain (SC) disruption management frequently assume the existence of some negative scenarios and suggest ways to proactively protect and reactively recover the SC operations and performance if such scenarios occur. Though, there is a paucity of research on how to support methodologically the detection of realistic disruption scenarios, ideally of different risk aversion degrees. The contribution of our study lies in a conceptualization of a new methodical approach to the detection of disruption scenarios, ripple effect dispersal and recovery paths in supply chains on the basis of structural genomes. The objective is to integrate and expand the existing knowledge gained isolated in robustness analysis and recovery planning into a comprehensive framework for building a theory as well as for managerial purposes. The outcomes of this research constitute a useful decision-making support tool that allows detecting disruption scenarios at different risk-aversion levels based on the quantification of the structural robustness with the use of the genome method and observing the scope of disruption propagation, i.e., the ripple effect. The advantage of using a robustness computation by the genome method is that this allows detecting both the disruption scenarios of different severity, the ripple effect dispersal, and the corresponding recovery paths. Our results can be of value for decision-makers to compare different supply chain structural designs regarding the robustness and to identify disruption scenarios that interrupt the supply chain operations to different extents. The scenario detection can be further used for identifying optimal reconfiguration paths to deploy proactive contingency and reactive recovery policies. We show a correlation between the risk aversion degree of disruption scenarios and the outcomes of the reconfiguration policies.

[1]  Vladimir Rykov,et al.  Reliability of Engineering Systems , 2016 .

[2]  Terje Aven,et al.  How some types of risk assessments can support resilience analysis and management , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  Dmitry Ivanov,et al.  A real-option approach to mitigate disruption risk in the supply chain , 2019, Omega.

[4]  Dmitry Ivanov,et al.  Resilient supplier selection and optimal order allocation under disruption risks , 2019, International Journal of Production Economics.

[5]  Charles J. Colbourn,et al.  The Combinatorics of Network Reliability , 1987 .

[6]  S. Chopra,et al.  Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning & Operation , 2007 .

[7]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Antecedents of Resilient Supply Chains: An Empirical Study , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[8]  Dmitry Ivanov,et al.  Optimization of network redundancy and contingency planning in sustainable and resilient supply chain resource management under conditions of structural dynamics , 2019, Annals of Operations Research.

[9]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis , 2019, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review.

[10]  D. Ivanov Structural Dynamics and Resilience in Supply Chain Risk Management , 2017 .

[11]  John Yen,et al.  Analyzing the Resilience of Complex Supply Network Topologies Against Random and Targeted Disruptions , 2011, IEEE Systems Journal.

[12]  Stephan M. Wagner,et al.  Structural drivers of upstream supply chain complexity and the frequency of supply chain disruptions , 2015 .

[13]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[14]  Gerd Finke,et al.  The complexity of dissociation set problems in graphs , 2011, Discret. Appl. Math..

[15]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Ripple effect quantification by supplier risk exposure assessment , 2019, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[16]  Elkafi Hassini,et al.  Evolution of supply chain ripple effect: a bibliometric and meta-analytic view of the constructs , 2019, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[17]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Low-Certainty-Need (LCN) supply chains: a new perspective in managing disruption risks and resilience , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[18]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Agility and resilience as antecedents of supply chain performance under moderating effects of organizational culture within the humanitarian setting: a dynamic capability view , 2018, Production Planning & Control.

[19]  Philippe Baptiste,et al.  Graphs with maximal induced matchings of the same size , 2012, Discret. Appl. Math..

[20]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Literature review on disruption recovery in the supply chain* , 2017, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[21]  Eugene Levner,et al.  Entropy-based model for the ripple effect: managing environmental risks in supply chains , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[22]  Tadeusz Sawik,et al.  A portfolio approach to supply chain disruption management , 2017, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[23]  Erik Hofmann Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning and Operation, S. Chopra, P. Meindl, 5th ed , 2013 .

[24]  Surya Prakash,et al.  Measuring and mitigating the effects of cost disturbance propagation in multi-echelon apparel supply chains , 2020, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Boris V. Sokolov,et al.  Optimal distribution (re)planning in a centralized multi-stage supply network under conditions of the ripple effect and structure dynamics , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Yi-Kuei Lin,et al.  System reliability for a multistate intermodal logistics network with time windows , 2017, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[27]  H. Gurnani,et al.  Managing Risk of Supply Disruptions: Incentives for Capacity Restoration , 2013 .

[28]  Zhimin Xi,et al.  A Unified Framework for Evaluating Supply Chain Reliability and Resilience , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[29]  Oded Cats,et al.  Robustness assessment of link capacity reduction for complex networks: Application for public transport systems , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[30]  Steven A. Melnyk,et al.  Supply chain risk and resilience: theory building through structured experiments and simulation , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[31]  Reza Zanjirani Farahani,et al.  Resilient supply chain network design under competition: A case study , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[32]  Kash Barker,et al.  A Bayesian network model for resilience-based supplier selection , 2016 .

[33]  Ivanov,et al.  Handbook of Ripple Effects in the Supply Chain , 2019, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science.

[34]  Wentong Cai,et al.  A graph-based model to measure structural redundancy for supply chain resilience , 2019, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[35]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Ripple effect in the supply chain: an analysis and recent literature , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[36]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Digital Supply Chain Twins: Managing the Ripple Effect, Resilience, and Disruption Risks by Data-Driven Optimization, Simulation, and Visibility , 2019, Handbook of Ripple Effects in the Supply Chain.

[37]  Joseph Fiksel,et al.  The Evolution of Resilience in Supply Chain Management: A Retrospective on Ensuring Supply Chain Resilience , 2019, Journal of Business Logistics.

[38]  Francesco Pilati,et al.  Assembly systems in Industry 4.0 era: a road map to understand Assembly 4.0 , 2019, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[39]  Dmitry Ivanov,et al.  Exact and heuristic methods for integrated supply chain design reliability analysis , 2016 .

[40]  D. Ivanov,et al.  Global Supply Chain and Operations Management , 2021, Springer Texts in Business and Economics.

[41]  Ruhul A. Sarker,et al.  A mathematical modelling approach for managing sudden disturbances in a three-tier manufacturing supply chain , 2019, Ann. Oper. Res..

[42]  Enzo Morosini Frazzon,et al.  A supervised machine learning approach to data-driven simulation of resilient supplier selection in digital manufacturing , 2019, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[43]  Rahul C. Basole,et al.  Supply Network Structure, Visibility, and Risk Diffusion: A Computational Approach , 2014, Decis. Sci..

[44]  Dmitry Ivanov,et al.  ‘A blessing in disguise’ or ‘as if it wasn’t hard enough already’: reciprocal and aggravate vulnerabilities in the supply chain , 2020, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[45]  Manoj Kumar Tiwari,et al.  Measuring the Resilience of Supply Chain Systems Using a Survival Model , 2015, IEEE Systems Journal.

[46]  Jennifer Blackhurst,et al.  Modelling Supply Chain Adaptation for Disruptions: An Empirically Grounded Complex Adaptive Systems Approach , 2018, Journal of Operations Management.

[47]  Yusoon Kim,et al.  Supply network disruption and resilience: A network structural perspective , 2015 .

[48]  Dmitry Ivanov,et al.  Simultaneous structural–operational control of supply chain dynamics and resilience , 2019, Ann. Oper. Res..

[49]  Yossi Sheffi,et al.  The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage , 2005 .

[50]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Structural quantification of the ripple effect in the supply chain , 2016 .

[51]  Kevin P. Scheibe,et al.  Supply chain disruption propagation: a systemic risk and normal accident theory perspective , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[52]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  The design of a responsive sustainable supply chain network under uncertainty , 2015 .

[53]  Dmitry Ivanov,et al.  A new resilience measure for supply networks with the ripple effect considerations: a Bayesian network approach , 2019, Ann. Oper. Res..

[54]  Yanfeng Ouyang,et al.  Reliable Facility Location Design Under the Risk of Disruptions , 2010, Oper. Res..

[55]  Charles J. Colbourn,et al.  Edge-packing of graphs and network reliability , 1988, Discret. Math..

[56]  Thilo Gross,et al.  Identifying dynamical instabilities in supply networks using generalized modeling , 2019, Journal of Operations Management.

[57]  José M. Vidal,et al.  Supply network topology and robustness against disruptions – an investigation using multi-agent model , 2011 .

[58]  Kaitlin S. Dunn,et al.  An Empirically Derived Framework of Global Supply Resiliency , 2011 .

[59]  Rameshwar Dubey,et al.  Bridging and buffering: Strategies for mitigating supply risk and improving supply chain performance , 2016 .

[60]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Hybrid Fuzzy-Probabilistic Approach to Supply Chain Resilience Assessment , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[61]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  Does the ripple effect influence the bullwhip effect? An integrated analysis of structural and operational dynamics in the supply chain† , 2019, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[62]  Martha C. Wilson,et al.  The impact of transportation disruptions on supply chain performance , 2007 .

[63]  Sebastián Lozano,et al.  Assessing supply chain robustness to links failure , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[64]  Nickolas K. Freeman,et al.  Robust Sourcing from Suppliers under Ambiguously Correlated Major Disruption Risks , 2018, Production and Operations Management.

[65]  Boris V. Sokolov,et al.  Control and system-theoretic identification of the supply chain dynamics domain for planning, analysis and adaptation of performance under uncertainty , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[66]  Ilaria Giannoccaro,et al.  The Impact of Control and Complexity on Supply Network Performance: An Empirically Informed Investigation Using NK Simulation Analysis , 2018, Decis. Sci..

[67]  Manoj Kumar Tiwari,et al.  Bayesian network modelling for supply chain risk propagation , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[68]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Empirical investigation of data analytics capability and organizational flexibility as complements to supply chain resilience , 2019, Int. J. Prod. Res..