Prediction and analysis of near-road concentrations using a reduced-form emission/dispersion model

BackgroundNear-road exposures of traffic-related air pollutants have been receiving increased attention due to evidence linking emissions from high-traffic roadways to adverse health outcomes. To date, most epidemiological and risk analyses have utilized simple but crude exposure indicators, most typically proximity measures, such as the distance between freeways and residences, to represent air quality impacts from traffic. This paper derives and analyzes a simplified microscale simulation model designed to predict short- (hourly) to long-term (annual average) pollutant concentrations near roads. Sensitivity analyses and case studies are used to highlight issues in predicting near-road exposures.MethodsProcess-based simulation models using a computationally efficient reduced-form response surface structure and a minimum number of inputs integrate the major determinants of air pollution exposures: traffic volume and vehicle emissions, meteorology, and receptor location. We identify the most influential variables and then derive a set of multiplicative submodels that match predictions from "parent" models MOBILE6.2 and CALINE4. The assembled model is applied to two case studies in the Detroit, Michigan area. The first predicts carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations at a monitoring site near a freeway. The second predicts CO and PM2.5 concentrations in a dense receptor grid over a 1 km2 area around the intersection of two major roads. We analyze the spatial and temporal patterns of pollutant concentration predictions.ResultsPredicted CO concentrations showed reasonable agreement with annual average and 24-hour measurements, e.g., 59% of the 24-hr predictions were within a factor of two of observations in the warmer months when CO emissions are more consistent. The highest concentrations of both CO and PM2.5 were predicted to occur near intersections and downwind of major roads during periods of unfavorable meteorology (e.g., low wind speeds) and high emissions (e.g., weekday rush hour). The spatial and temporal variation among predicted concentrations was significant, and resulted in unusual distributional and correlation characteristics, including strong negative correlation for receptors on opposite sides of a road and the highest short-term concentrations on the "upwind" side of the road.ConclusionsThe case study findings can likely be generalized to many other locations, and they have important implications for epidemiological and other studies. The reduced-form model is intended for exposure assessment, risk assessment, epidemiological, geographical information systems, and other applications.

[1]  R Neutra,et al.  Examining associations between childhood asthma and traffic flow using a geographic information system. , 1999, Environmental health perspectives.

[2]  Min-Der Lin,et al.  The application of GIS to air quality analysis in Taichung City, Taiwan, ROC , 2002, Environ. Model. Softw..

[3]  Frederick W Lipfert,et al.  On exposure and response relationships for health effects associated with exposure to vehicular traffic , 2008, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[4]  Michal Krzyzanowski,et al.  Health Effects of Transport-related Air Pollution , 2005 .

[5]  S. Batterman,et al.  Residence location as a measure of environmental exposure: a review of air pollution epidemiology studies , 2000, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[6]  Vlad Isakov,et al.  Resolving Local-Scale Emissions for Modeling Air Quality near Roadways , 2008, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[7]  Taosheng Jin,et al.  Application of GIS to modified models of vehicle emission dispersion , 2005 .

[8]  Altaf Arain,et al.  A review and evaluation of intraurban air pollution exposure models , 2005, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[9]  Rich Cook,et al.  Preparing highway emissions inventories for urban scale modeling: A case study in Philadelphia , 2006 .

[10]  Richard G Dowling,et al.  PLANNING TECHNIQUES TO ESTIMATE SPEEDS AND SERVICE VOLUMES FOR PLANNING APPLICATIONS , 1997 .

[11]  P. E. Benson CALINE4 - A DISPERSION MODEL FOR PREDICTING AIR POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS NEAR ROADWAYS. FINAL REPORT , 1984 .

[12]  Debbie A. Niemeier,et al.  Using CALINE dispersion to assess vehicular PM2.5 emissions , 2007 .

[13]  Jonathan Cohen,et al.  Relationship between motor vehicle emissions of hazardous pollutants, roadway proximity, and ambient concentrations in Portland, Oregon , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[14]  Zoran Ristovski,et al.  Determination of average emission factors for vehicles on a busy road , 2003 .

[15]  Kai Zhang,et al.  Near-road air pollutant concentrations of CO and PM2.5: A comparison of MOBILE6.2/CALINE4 and generalized additive models , 2010 .

[16]  Michael Claggett,et al.  Predicting Near-Road PM2.5 Concentrations , 2009 .

[17]  C. Vionnet [Environmental health]. , 1983, Krankenpflege. Soins infirmiers.

[18]  Olav R. Hansen,et al.  FLACS CFD air quality model performance evaluation with Kit Fox, MUST, Prairie Grass, and EMU observations , 2004 .

[19]  E. Karlson,et al.  Exposure to Traffic Pollution and Increased Risk of Rheumatoid Arthritis , 2009, Environmental health perspectives.

[20]  G. Pershagen,et al.  Using geographic information systems to assess individual historical exposure to air pollution from traffic and house heating in Stockholm. , 2001, Environmental health perspectives.

[21]  G. Lemasters,et al.  A Review of Land-use Regression Models for Characterizing Intraurban Air Pollution Exposure , 2007, Inhalation toxicology.