Positron emission tomography imaging using radiolabeled inorganic nanomaterials.

CONSPECTUS: Positron emission tomography (PET) is a radionuclide imaging technology that plays an important role in preclinical and clinical research. With administration of a small amount of radiotracer, PET imaging can provide a noninvasive, highly sensitive, and quantitative readout of its organ/tissue targeting efficiency and pharmacokinetics. Various radiotracers have been designed to target specific molecular events. Compared with antibodies, proteins, peptides, and other biologically relevant molecules, nanoparticles represent a new frontier in molecular imaging probe design, enabling the attachment of different imaging modalities, targeting ligands, and therapeutic payloads in a single vector. We introduce the radiolabeled nanoparticle platforms that we and others have developed. Due to the fundamental differences in the various nanoparticles and radioisotopes, most radiolabeling methods are designed case-by-case. We focus on some general rules about selecting appropriate isotopes for given types of nanoparticles, as well as adjusting the labeling strategies according to specific applications. We classified these radiolabeling methods into four categories: (1) complexation reaction of radiometal ions with chelators via coordination chemistry; (2) direct bombardment of nanoparticles via hadronic projectiles; (3) synthesis of nanoparticles using a mixture of radioactive and nonradioactive precursors; (4) chelator-free postsynthetic radiolabeling. Method 1 is generally applicable to different nanomaterials as long as the surface chemistry is well-designed. However, the addition of chelators brings concerns of possible changes to the physicochemical properties of nanomaterials and detachment of the radiometal. Methods 2 and 3 have improved radiochemical stability. The applications are, however, limited by the possible damage to the nanocomponent caused by the proton beams (method 2) and harsh synthetic conditions (method 3). Method 4 is still in its infancy. Although being fast and specific, only a few combinations of isotopes and nanoparticles have been explored. Since the applications of radiolabeled nanoparticles are based on the premise that the radioisotopes are stably attached to the nanomaterials, stability (colloidal and radiochemical) assessment of radiolabeled nanoparticles is also highlighted. Despite the fact that thousands of nanomaterials have been developed for clinical research, only very few have moved to humans. One major reason is the lack of understanding of the biological behavior of nanomaterials. We discuss specific examples of using PET imaging to monitor the in vivo fate of radiolabeled nanoparticles, emphasizing the importance of labeling strategies and caution in interpreting PET data. Design considerations for radiolabeled nanoplatforms for multimodal molecular imaging are also illustrated, with a focus on strategies to combine the strengths of different imaging modalities and to prolong the circulation time.

[1]  S. Gambhir Molecular imaging of cancer with positron emission tomography , 2002, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[2]  Jesse V Jokerst,et al.  Molecular imaging with theranostic nanoparticles. , 2011, Accounts of chemical research.

[3]  Stephen J Archibald,et al.  Recent advances in chelator design and labelling methodology for (68) Ga radiopharmaceuticals. , 2014, Journal of labelled compounds & radiopharmaceuticals.

[4]  D. Goldenberg Targeted therapy of cancer with radiolabeled antibodies. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  Younan Xia,et al.  Radioluminescent gold nanocages with controlled radioactivity for real-time in vivo imaging. , 2013, Nano letters.

[6]  Jan Grimm,et al.  Cerenkov Luminescence Imaging of Medical Isotopes , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  C. Anderson,et al.  Molecular Imaging of Cancer with Copper‐64 Radiopharmaceuticals and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) , 2009 .

[8]  Dingbin Liu,et al.  Chelator-Free 64Cu-Integrated Gold Nanomaterials for Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Guided Photothermal Cancer Therapy , 2014, ACS nano.

[9]  Hua Ai,et al.  Surface-engineered magnetic nanoparticle platforms for cancer imaging and therapy. , 2011, Accounts of chemical research.

[10]  C. Anderson,et al.  Coordinating radiometals of copper, gallium, indium, yttrium, and zirconium for PET and SPECT imaging of disease. , 2010, Chemical reviews.

[11]  Hao Hong,et al.  Molecular imaging and therapy of cancer with radiolabeled nanoparticles. , 2009, Nano today.

[12]  Dean Ho,et al.  Cancer Nanomedicine: From Drug Delivery to Imaging , 2013, Science Translational Medicine.

[13]  J. Engle,et al.  89Zr radiochemistry for positron emission tomography. , 2011, Medicinal chemistry (Shariqah (United Arab Emirates)).

[14]  M. Welch,et al.  In vivo transchelation of copper-64 from TETA-octreotide to superoxide dismutase in rat liver. , 2000, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[15]  Sanjiv S. Gambhir,et al.  Dual-Function Probe for PET and Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging of Tumor Vasculature , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  P. Choyke Nanoparticles: Take Only Pictures, Leave Only Footprints , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[17]  Chris Orvig,et al.  Matching chelators to radiometals for radiopharmaceuticals. , 2014, Chemical Society reviews.

[18]  Yan Xing,et al.  Radiolabeled Nanoparticles for Multimodality Tumor Imaging , 2014, Theranostics.

[19]  Fan Zhang,et al.  The genotype-dependent influence of functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes on fetal development. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[20]  Kai Liu,et al.  Rapid size-controlled synthesis of dextran-coated, 64Cu-doped iron oxide nanoparticles. , 2012, ACS nano.

[21]  Yong Ding,et al.  Self-Illuminating 64Cu-Doped CdSe/ZnS Nanocrystals for in Vivo Tumor Imaging , 2014, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[22]  Kai Chen,et al.  Dual-modality optical and positron emission tomography imaging of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor on tumor vasculature using quantum dots , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[23]  W. Kreyling,et al.  Radiolabelling of engineered nanoparticles for in vitro and in vivo tracing applications using cyclotron accelerators , 2011, Archives of Toxicology.

[24]  Dong Liang,et al.  A chelator-free multifunctional [64Cu]CuS nanoparticle platform for simultaneous micro-PET/CT imaging and photothermal ablation therapy. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[25]  M. Meyerand,et al.  Intrinsically Germanium‐69‐Labeled Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: Synthesis and In‐Vivo Dual‐Modality PET/MR Imaging , 2014, Advanced materials.

[26]  Simon M. Ametamey,et al.  Molecular Imaging with PET , 2008 .

[27]  Peng Huang,et al.  PET and NIR optical imaging using self-illuminating (64)Cu-doped chelator-free gold nanoclusters. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[28]  H. Choi,et al.  Mesenchymal stem cell-based cell engineering with multifunctional mesoporous silica nanoparticles for tumor delivery. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[29]  Xing-Jie Liang,et al.  Theranostic nanoparticles engineered for clinic and pharmaceutics. , 2011, Accounts of chemical research.

[30]  Kai Chen,et al.  PET/NIRF/MRI triple functional iron oxide nanoparticles. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[31]  Zhen Cheng,et al.  Radiation-luminescence-excited quantum dots for in vivo multiplexed optical imaging. , 2010, Small.

[32]  Jinwoo Cheon,et al.  Synergistically Integrated Nanoparticles as Multimodal Probes for Nanobiotechnology , 2009 .

[33]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Chimeric ferritin nanocages for multiple function loading and multimodal imaging. , 2011, Nano letters.

[34]  Mingyuan Gao,et al.  In situ 111In-doping for achieving biocompatible and non-leachable 111In-labeled Fe3O4 nanoparticles. , 2014, Chemical communications.

[35]  K. Prasad,et al.  Radiation protection in humans: extending the concept of as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) from dose to biological damage. , 2004, The British journal of radiology.

[36]  M. Bawendi,et al.  Renal clearance of quantum dots , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[37]  Heather M. Hennkens,et al.  Radiometals for combined imaging and therapy. , 2013, Chemical reviews.

[38]  Teófilo Rojo,et al.  The challenge to relate the physicochemical properties of colloidal nanoparticles to their cytotoxicity. , 2013, Accounts of chemical research.

[39]  Karen L Wooley,et al.  Copper-64-alloyed gold nanoparticles for cancer imaging: improved radiolabel stability and diagnostic accuracy. , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[40]  Jordi Llop,et al.  Biodistribution of different sized nanoparticles assessed by positron emission tomography: a general strategy for direct activation of metal oxide particles. , 2013, ACS nano.

[41]  J. Bading,et al.  Pegylated Arg-Gly-Asp peptide: 64Cu labeling and PET imaging of brain tumor alphavbeta3-integrin expression. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[42]  O. Muzik,et al.  PET of human prostate cancer xenografts in mice with increased uptake of 64CuCl2. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[43]  Mithat Gönen,et al.  Clinical translation of an ultrasmall inorganic optical-PET imaging nanoparticle probe , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[44]  Bing Wang,et al.  Metabolism of nanomaterials in vivo: blood circulation and organ clearance. , 2013, Accounts of chemical research.

[45]  Hak Soo Choi,et al.  Rapid translocation of nanoparticles from the lung airspaces to the body , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[46]  Xin Cai,et al.  Radioactive 198Au-Doped Nanostructures with Different Shapes for In Vivo Analyses of Their Biodistribution, Tumor Uptake, and Intratumoral Distribution , 2014, ACS nano.

[47]  H. Dai,et al.  In vivo biodistribution and highly efficient tumour targeting of carbon nanotubes in mice. , 2020, Nature nanotechnology.

[48]  Jordi Llop,et al.  Tracing nanoparticles in vivo: a new general synthesis of positron emitting metal oxide nanoparticles by proton beam activation. , 2012, The Analyst.

[49]  Erin Lavik,et al.  The role of nanomaterials in translational medicine. , 2011, ACS nano.

[50]  Qian Liu,et al.  18F-Labeled magnetic-upconversion nanophosphors via rare-Earth cation-assisted ligand assembly. , 2011, ACS nano.

[51]  H. Hong,et al.  In a "nutshell": intrinsically radio-labeled quantum dots. , 2012, American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging.

[52]  Luis M. De Leon-Rodriguez,et al.  The synthesis and chelation chemistry of DOTA-peptide conjugates. , 2008, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[53]  Yadong Yin,et al.  Cation Exchange Reactions in Ionic Nanocrystals , 2004, Science.

[54]  Yin Zhang,et al.  PET tracers based on Zirconium-89. , 2011, Current radiopharmaceuticals.

[55]  David A Mankoff,et al.  A definition of molecular imaging. , 2007, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[56]  Hao Hong,et al.  Chelator-free synthesis of a dual-modality PET/MRI agent. , 2013, Angewandte Chemie.