Primary energy and exergy of desalination technologies in a power-water cogeneration scheme

Abstract The primary energy consumption of a spectrum of desalination systems is assessed using operating information and technical bids for real plants configured with coproduction of electricity. The energy efficiency of desalination plants is often rated on a stand-alone basis using metrics such as specific energy consumption, gained output ratio, and second law efficiency, which can lead to inconsistent conclusions because the heat and electrical work inputs to the plant have very different exergies and costs, which must be taken into account. When both the heat and work inputs are drawn from a common primary energy source, such as the fuel provided to electricity-water coproduction systems, these inputs can be compared and combined if they are traced back to primary energy use. In the present study, we compare 48 different configurations of electricity production and desalination on the basis of primary energy use, including cases with pretreatment and hybridized systems, using performance figures from real and quoted desalination systems operating in the GCC region. The results show that, while reverse osmosis is still the most energy efficient desalination technology, the gap between work and thermally driven desalination technologies is reduced when considered on the basis of primary energy. The results also show that pretreatment with nanofiltration or hybridization of multiple desalination systems can help to reduce energy requirements. Additionally, the specific type of power plant in the coproduction scheme and its operating parameters can have a significant impact on the performance of desalination technologies relative to one other.

[1]  Hoseyn Sayyaadi,et al.  Thermoeconomic optimization of multi effect distillation desalination systems , 2010 .

[2]  Bill Andrews,et al.  Isobaric Energy-Recovery Devices: Past, Present, and Future , 2012 .

[3]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments , 2006 .

[4]  Noreddine Ghaffour,et al.  Renewable energy-driven innovative energy-efficient desalination technologies , 2014 .

[5]  Ronan K. McGovern,et al.  On the potential of forward osmosis to energetically outperform reverse osmosis desalination , 2014 .

[6]  N. Hilal,et al.  Nuclear desalination: A state-of-the-art review , 2019, Desalination.

[7]  Jay R. Werber,et al.  Forward osmosis: Where are we now? , 2015 .

[8]  M. Amjad,et al.  Novel draw solution for forward osmosis based solar desalination , 2018, Applied Energy.

[9]  Linda Zou,et al.  Recent developments in forward osmosis : opportunities and challenges. , 2012 .

[10]  Y. M. El-Sayed,et al.  Chapter 2 – Fundamentals of Distillation , 1980 .

[11]  Hyung Won Chung,et al.  Energy efficiency of membrane distillation up to high salinity: Evaluating critical system size and optimal membrane thickness , 2017 .

[12]  R. S. Silver An assessment of multiple effect boiling distillation in relation to multi-stage flash distillation , 1971 .

[13]  A. Bejan Advanced Engineering Thermodynamics , 1988 .

[14]  Gregory P. Thiel,et al.  Comparison of fouling propensity between reverse osmosis, forward osmosis, and membrane distillation , 2018, Journal of Membrane Science.

[15]  Ronan K. McGovern,et al.  Entropy Generation Analysis of Desalination Technologies , 2011, Entropy.

[16]  Hung C. Duong,et al.  Evaluating energy consumption of air gap membrane distillation for seawater desalination at pilot scale level , 2016 .

[17]  Takayuki Nakanishi,et al.  Operation and reliability of very high-recovery seawater desalination technologies by brine conversion two-stage RO desalination system , 2001 .

[18]  E. Assoumou,et al.  Water modeling in an energy optimization framework – The water-scarce middle east context , 2013 .

[19]  R. K. Kamali,et al.  Thermodynamic design and parametric study of MED-TVC , 2008 .

[20]  Hassan K. Abdulrahim,et al.  Viability of integrating forward osmosis (FO) as pretreatment for existing MSF desalting unit , 2016 .

[21]  Y. El-Sayed,et al.  The energetics of desalination processes , 2001 .

[22]  Karan H. Mistry,et al.  An Economics-Based Second Law Efficiency , 2013, Entropy.

[23]  Noreddine Ghaffour,et al.  Technical review and evaluation of the economics of water desalination: Current and future challenges for better water supply sustainability , 2013 .

[24]  Ramy H. Mohammed,et al.  Transient performance of MED processes with different feed configurations , 2018, Desalination.

[25]  Michael J. Moran,et al.  Availability analysis: A guide to efficient energy use , 1982 .

[26]  H. Shih,et al.  Utilization of waste heat in the desalination process , 2007 .

[27]  Hassan E.S. Fath,et al.  Techno-economic assessment and environmental impacts of desalination technologies , 2011 .

[28]  J. Lienhard,et al.  Unpacking compaction: Effect of hydraulic pressure on alginate fouling , 2017 .

[29]  Shaobin Wang,et al.  Numerical modeling and economic evaluation of two multi-effect vacuum membrane distillation (ME-VMD) processes , 2017 .

[30]  Karan H. Mistry,et al.  Generalized Least Energy of Separation for Desalination and Other Chemical Separation Processes , 2013, Entropy.

[31]  M. J. Moran,et al.  Thermal design and optimization , 1995 .

[32]  Guillermo Zaragoza,et al.  Efficiency in the use of solar thermal energy of small membrane desalination systems for decentralized water production , 2014 .

[33]  J. Lilliestam,et al.  Concentrating solar power for less than USD 0.07 per kWh: finally the breakthrough? , 2018, Renewable Energy Focus.

[34]  Lawrence L. Kazmerski,et al.  Energy Consumption and Water Production Cost of Conventional and Renewable-Energy-Powered Desalination Processes , 2013 .

[35]  Carlos Rubio-Maya,et al.  Design optimization of a polygeneration plant fuelled by natural gas and renewable energy sources , 2011 .

[36]  Sebastian Büttner,et al.  Experimental study of the memsys vacuum-multi-effect-membrane-distillation (V-MEMD) module , 2013 .

[37]  Xian-wen Ning,et al.  Performance study on a passive solar seawater desalination system using multi-effect heat recovery , 2018 .

[38]  John H. Lienhard,et al.  Thermodynamics, Exergy, and Energy Efficiency in Desalination Systems , 2017 .

[39]  A. M. Soliman,et al.  A novel study of using oil refinery plants waste gases for thermal desalination and electric power generation: Energy, exergy & cost evaluations , 2017 .

[40]  John H. Lienhard,et al.  Membrane distillation model based on heat exchanger theory and configuration comparison , 2016 .

[41]  Raphael Semiat,et al.  Energy issues in desalination processes. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[42]  M. Al-Shammiri,et al.  Multi-effect distillation plants: state of the art , 1999 .

[43]  Thomas Melin,et al.  State-of-the-art of reverse osmosis desalination , 2007 .

[44]  Ronan K. McGovern,et al.  Raising forward osmosis brine concentration efficiency through flow rate optimization , 2015 .

[45]  R. A. Simmons,et al.  Techno-Economics of Cogeneration Approaches for Combined Power and Desalination From Concentrated Solar Power , 2019, Journal of Solar Energy Engineering.

[46]  S. Oh,et al.  Desalination processes evaluation at common platform: A universal performance ratio (UPR) method , 2018 .