Importance of soft tissue inhomogeneity in magnetic peripheral nerve stimulation.

In magnetic peripheral nerve stimulation with a figure-of-eight coil, a 'tangential-edge' coil orientation (the nerve is beneath the coil intersection and perpendicular to the coil wings) is ideal theoretically. However, some experimental results show that strong muscle responses are elicited with a 'symmetrical-tangential' coil orientation (the nerve is beneath the coil intersection and parallel to the coil wings), which is inconsistent with the cable theory. We hypothesized that the 10:1 conductivity difference between muscle and fat would cause inconsistent results during magnetic median nerve stimulation in the elbow, which was verified using an inhomogeneous volume conductor model. The induced electric fields were measured in a model composed of saline solutions of different concentrations divided by a cellophane sheet. A nerve was imagined along the boundary between the two solutions, and the coil was held in a 'symmetrical-tangential' position. Virtual cathodes, which were off the nerve in the homogeneous model, were on the nerve in the inhomogeneous model. The previous inconsistent results were explained by considering soft tissue inhomogeneity without any modification of the assumption in the cable theory that only the induced electric field component parallel to the nerve is responsible for nerve excitation.

[1]  M. Hallett,et al.  Determining the site of stimulation during magnetic stimulation of a peripheral nerve. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  P. Basser,et al.  A model of the stimulation of a nerve fiber by electromagnetic induction , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Shoogo Ueno,et al.  Estimation of structures of neural fibers in the human brain by vectorial magnetic stimulation , 1991 .

[4]  V E Amassian,et al.  An analysis of peripheral motor nerve stimulation in humans using the magnetic coil. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  A P Rudell,et al.  Measurement of the electric field induced into inhomogeneous volume conductors by magnetic coils: application to human spinal neurogeometry. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  Dominique M. Durand,et al.  Induced electric fields by magnetic stimulation in non-homogeneous conducting media , 1989, Images of the Twenty-First Century. Proceedings of the Annual International Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society,.

[7]  K. Foster,et al.  Dielectric properties of tissues and biological materials: a critical review. , 1989, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[8]  J R Daube,et al.  The utility of magnetic stimulation for routine peripheral nerve conduction studies , 1988, Muscle & nerve.

[9]  W C Wiederholt,et al.  Threshold and conduction velocity in isolated mixed mammalian nerves , 1970, Neurology.

[10]  W. Rushton The effect upon the threshold for nervous excitation of the length of nerve exposed, and the angle between current and nerve , 1927, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  V. Amassian,et al.  Magnetic coil stimulation of straight and bent amphibian and mammalian peripheral nerve in vitro: locus of excitation. , 1993, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  B A Evans,et al.  Magnetic Stimulation of the Peripheral Nervous System , 1991, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[13]  N M Murray,et al.  The influence of stimulus type on the magnetic excitation of nerve structures. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  K. Harada,et al.  Localized stimulation of neural tissues in the brain by means of a paired configuration of time-varying magnetic fields , 1988 .

[15]  Significance of magnetic coil position in peripheral motor nerve stimulation , 1990, Muscle & nerve.

[16]  S. Chokroverty Magnetic stimulation of the human peripheral nerves. , 1989, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  V. Amassian,et al.  Focal stimulation of human peripheral nerve with the magnetic coil: A comparison with electrical stimulation , 1989, Experimental Neurology.

[18]  D. Goodin,et al.  A comparison of magnetic and electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves , 1990, Muscle & nerve.

[19]  F Grandori,et al.  Transverse-field activation mechanism in magnetic stimulation of peripheral nerves. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  D. Durand,et al.  Effects of induced electric fields on finite neuronal structures: a simulation study , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Shozo Tobimatsu,et al.  PS-44-9 The effect of magnetic coil orientation on excitation of human median nerve , 1995 .

[22]  P. Maccabee,et al.  Spatial distribution of the electric field induced in volume by round and figure '8' magnetic coils: relevance to activation of sensory nerve fibers. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[23]  B. Shahani,et al.  Spatial dispersion of magnetic stimulation in peripheral nerves , 1990, Muscle & nerve.

[24]  S. Bandinelli,et al.  Effects of coil design on delivery of focal magnetic stimulation. Technical considerations. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.