Exploring Library 2.0 on the Social Web

Library 2.0 literature has described many of the possibilities Web 2.0 technologies offer to libraries. Case studies have assessed local use, but no studies have measured the Library 2.0 phenomenon by searching public social networking sites. This study used library-specific terms to search public social networking sites, blog search engines, and social bookmarking sites for activity associated with librarians and library users. Blog search data about the recentness of activity or the popularity of a blog post indicate that Library 2.0 technology has many early adopters but provides less evidence of sustained use. The results follow a curve resembling the 80/20 rule and also resemble Chris Anderson's “long tail” effect, in which very few authors create the vast amount of content. These exploratory results can be used as a starting point for future studies. Librarians who use tags to describe Web-based content might use these findings to select more effective tags. Librarians implementing a blog or a social networking presence might use this study to balance the benefits with the amount of work required to maintain an up-to-date presence.

[1]  Elaine Peterson,et al.  Beneath the Metadata: Some Philosophical Problems with Folksonomy , 2006 .

[2]  David Stuart Social Media Metrics , 2009 .

[3]  Jerry D. Campbell Still Shaking the Conceptual Foundations of Reference: A Perspective , 2007 .

[4]  Priscilla S. Markwood,et al.  The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business is Selling Less of More , 2006 .

[5]  M. Thelwall Social networks, gender, and friending: An analysis of MySpace member profiles , 2008 .

[6]  James Caverlee,et al.  Profiling Social Networks: A Social Tagging Perspective , 2009, D Lib Mag..

[7]  Nguyen Cuong Linh,et al.  A survey of the application of Web 2.0 in Australasian university libraries , 2008, Libr. Hi Tech.

[8]  Helen Fitzgerald,et al.  Review of: Farkas, Meredith G. Social software in libraries: building collaboration, communication, and community online. Medford, NJ: Information Today Inc., 2007 , 2007, Inf. Res..

[9]  Paula Barnett-Ellis,et al.  Checking Out Facebook.com: The Impact of a Digital Trend on Academic Libraries , 2007 .

[10]  Stephanie Rosenblatt Social Software in Libraries: , 2008 .

[11]  Ruoyao Shi,et al.  A Survey of the Application of Web 2.0 in Top 30 Chinese University Libraries , 2009, 2009 Second International Symposium on Knowledge Acquisition and Modeling.

[12]  Martin Myhill Library 2.0 and Beyond: Innovative Technologies and Tomorrow's User , 2008, Program.

[13]  Mariemma I. Yagüe The digital information war , 2007 .

[14]  Cathal McCauley,et al.  Social Software in Libraries: Building Collaboration, Communication, and Community Online , 2008, Program.

[15]  Alexander Halavais,et al.  DO DUGG DIGGERS DIGG DILIGENTLY? , 2009 .

[16]  Andrew M. Ledbetter,et al.  TUNES THAT BIND? , 2009 .

[17]  David Weinberger,et al.  Tagging and Why it Matters , 2005 .

[18]  ThelwallMike Social networks, gender, and friending: An analysis of MySpace member profiles , 2008 .

[19]  Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.  PIM @ academia: how e-mail is used by scholars , 2009, Online Inf. Rev..

[20]  Brian S. Mathews Moving Beyond the Reference Desk: Being Where Users Need Us , 2007 .