Intensity discrimination in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Weber fractions (delta I/I) for gated 500-ms tones at 0.3, 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 kHz, and at levels of the standard ranging from absolute threshold to 97 dB SPL, were measured in quiet and in high-pass noise in five listeners with cochlear hearing loss and in three normal-hearing listeners. In regions of hearing loss, the Weber fractions at a given SPL were sometimes normal. When the Weber fractions were normal or near-normal, the addition of high-pass noise elevated the Weber fraction, strongly suggesting the use of spread of excitation to higher frequencies. Inversely, when the Weber fractions were elevated, the addition of high-pass noise produced no additional elevation, suggesting an inability to use spread of excitation. In general, the relative size of the Weber fractions, the effects of high-pass noise, and to a lesser extent, the dependence of the Weber fraction on level, were consistent with expectations based upon the audiometric configuration and the use of excitation spread. There were several notable inconsistencies, however, in which normal Weber fractions were seen at a frequency on the edge of a steep high-frequency loss, and in which elevated Weber fractions were observed in a flat audiometric configuration. Finally, when compared at the same SL, the Weber fraction was sometimes smaller in cochlear-impaired than in normal hearing listeners. This was true even in high-pass noise, where excitation spread was limited, and may reflect the unusually steep rate versus level functions seen in auditory nerve fibers that innervate regions of pathology.

[1]  R A Lutfi,et al.  On the growth of masking asymmetry with stimulus intensity. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  W. J. McGill,et al.  Pure-tone intensity discrimination and energy detection. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  B C Moore,et al.  Pure-tone intensity discrimination: some experiments relating to the "near-miss" to Weber's law. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  So,et al.  An excitation‐pattern model for intensity discrimination , 1981 .

[5]  N. Viemeister,et al.  Intensity discrimination of pulsed sinusoids: the effects of filtered noise. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  M. Ruggero,et al.  Systemic Injection of Furosemide Alters the Mechanical Response to Sound of the Basilar Membrane , 1990 .

[7]  L. LUND-IVERSEN An investigation on the difference limen determined by the method of Lüscher-Zwislocki in normal hearing and in various forms of deafness. , 1952, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[8]  J. Zwislocki,et al.  A Simple Method for Indirect Monaural Determination of the Recruitment Phenomenon (Difference Limen in Intensity in Different Types of Deafness) , 1948 .

[9]  J J Zwislocki,et al.  Intensity discrimination determined with two paradigms in normal and hearing-impaired subjects. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  D. M. Green,et al.  Intensity discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  D A Nelson,et al.  High-level psychophysical tuning curves: forward masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[12]  M. Florentine,et al.  The SISI test: a review. Part I. , 1982, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[13]  R F Hess,et al.  Effects of flanking noise bands on the rate of growth of loudness of tones in normal and recruiting ears. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  David H. Raab,et al.  Intensity discrimination of tone bursts and the form of the Weber function , 1973 .

[15]  Edward Cudahy,et al.  Intensity discrimination for pulsed sinusoids of various frequencies , 1974 .

[16]  P. Denes,et al.  The Clinical Detection of Auditory Recruitment , 1950, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[17]  D. D. Greenwood Tone and noiseband masking: Level and bandwidth dependence , 1983 .

[18]  I. Hirsh,et al.  Difference limen and recruitment. , 1954, A.M.A. archives of otolaryngology.

[19]  N. Viemeister,et al.  Intensity discrimination, increment detection, and magnitude estimation for 1-kHz tones. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  R. Hellman,et al.  Loudness relations for individuals and groups in normal and impaired hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  L. Swisher,et al.  Response to intensity change in cochlear pathology , 1966, The Laryngoscope.

[22]  B. Moore,et al.  Psychoacoustic abilities of subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear hearing impairments and their relationship to the ability to understand speech. , 1989, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[23]  J K Cullen,et al.  Intensity difference limens at high frequencies. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  C M Reed,et al.  Intensity perception. XIV. Intensity discrimination in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  D. D. Greenwood,et al.  The intensitive DL of tones: Dependence of signal/masker ratio on tone level and on spectrum of added noise , 1993, Hearing Research.

[26]  R V Harrison,et al.  Rate-versus-intensity functions and related AP responses in normal and pathological guinea pig and human cochleas. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  C. Wier,et al.  A method for relating loudness-matching and intensity-discrimination data. , 1987, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[28]  J. Jerger,et al.  On the detection of extremely small changes in sound intensity. , 1959, A.M.A. archives of otolaryngology.

[29]  H Fastl,et al.  Discrimination of level differences by hearing-impaired patients. , 1981, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[30]  M Florentine,et al.  Intensity discrimination as a function of level and frequency and its relation to high-frequency hearing. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  M. Sachs,et al.  Rate versus level functions for auditory-nerve fibers in cats: tone-burst stimuli. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  M. Liberman,et al.  Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. IV. Stereocilia damage and alterations in rate- and phase-level functions , 1984, Hearing Research.