Speech perception benefits of FM and infrared devices to children with hearing aids in a typical classroom.

UNLABELLED Children typically learn in classroom environments that have background noise and reverberation that interfere with accurate speech perception. Amplification technology can enhance the speech perception of students who are hard of hearing. PURPOSE This study used a single-subject alternating treatments design to compare the speech recognition abilities of children who are, hard of hearing when they were using hearing aids with each of three frequency modulated (FM) or infrared devices. METHOD Eight 9-12-year-olds with mild to severe hearing loss repeated Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) sentence lists under controlled conditions in a typical kindergarten classroom with a background noise level of +10 dB signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio and 1.1 s reverberation time. Participants listened to HINT lists using hearing aids alone and hearing aids in combination with three types of S/N-enhancing devices that are currently used in mainstream classrooms: (a) FM systems linked to personal hearing aids, (b) infrared sound field systems with speakers placed throughout the classroom, and (c) desktop personal sound field FM systems. RESULTS The infrared ceiling sound field system did not provide benefit beyond that provided by hearing aids alone. Desktop and personal FM systems in combination with personal hearing aids provided substantial improvements in speech recognition. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS This information can assist in making S/N-enhancing device decisions for students using hearing aids. In a reverberant and noisy classroom setting, classroom sound field devices are not beneficial to speech perception for students with hearing aids, whereas either personal FM or desktop sound field systems provide listening benefits.

[1]  A K Nábĕlek,et al.  Comparison of amplification systems in an auditorium. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  R Leavitt,et al.  Speech degradation as measured by the Rapid Speech Transmission Index (RASTI). , 1991, Ear and hearing.

[3]  A Boothroyd,et al.  Experiments with Classroom FM Amplification , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[4]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Phoneme feature perception in noise by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[5]  Candace Bourland Hick,et al.  Listening effort and fatigue in school-age children with and without hearing loss. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[6]  A K Nábĕlek,et al.  Reception of consonants in a classroom as affected by monaural and binaural listening, noise, reverberation, and hearing aids. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  J. Dengerink,et al.  Children's Attitudes toward Peers Wearing Hearing Aids , 1984 .

[8]  A. Neuman,et al.  Children's perception of speech in reverberation. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  A M Tharpe,et al.  Speech recognition ability of children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss as a function of amplification, speech stimuli and listening condition. , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[10]  D W Downs,et al.  Processing demands during auditory learning under degraded listening conditions. , 1978, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[11]  C. Flexer.  Facilitating Hearing and Listening in Young Children , 1994 .

[12]  D. Baer,et al.  If reliance on epidemiology were to become epidemic, we would need to assess its social validity. , 1991, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[13]  D B Hawkins,et al.  Speech recognition in noise and reverberation by school-age children. , 1987, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[14]  S. Hayes,et al.  Alternating treatments design: one strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject. , 1979, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[15]  P. Mishler,et al.  The Use of Large Group Assistive Listening Devices With and Without Hearing Aids in an Adult Classroom Setting , 1997 .

[16]  T W Tillman,et al.  Room acoustics effects on monosyllabic word discrimination ability for normal and hearing-impaired children. , 1978, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[17]  M. Wolf,et al.  Social validity: the case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. , 1978, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[18]  Guidelines for Fitting and Monitoring FM Systems , 2002 .

[19]  P. Wertz,et al.  Effect of FM Auditory Trainers on Attending Behaviors of Learning-Disabled Children , 1991 .

[20]  Carl C. Crandell,et al.  Speech Perception in the Classroom. , 1999 .

[21]  J. Pickett,et al.  Monaural and binaural speech perception through hearing aids under noise and reverberation with normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1974, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[22]  R. J. Irwin,et al.  Relations among temporal acuity, hearing loss, and the perception of speech distorted by noise and reverberation. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  J. P. A. Lochner,et al.  The intelligibility of speech under reverberant conditions , 1961 .

[24]  Michael J. Kodaras,et al.  Reverberation Times of Typical Elementary School Classrooms , 1960 .

[25]  D. A. Sanders,et al.  Noise Conditions in Normal School Classrooms , 1965, Exceptional children.

[26]  J Bamford,et al.  The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children. , 1979, British journal of audiology.

[27]  R. H. Bolt,et al.  Theory of Speech masking by reverberation , 1949 .

[28]  L E Humes,et al.  Understanding the speech-understanding problems of the hearing impaired. , 1991, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[29]  S. Gelfand,et al.  Effects of small room reverberation upon the recognition of some consonant features , 1979 .

[30]  J. S. Bradley,et al.  Speech intelligibility studies in classrooms. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  I. Blood,et al.  Professional and lay observers' impressions of preschoolers wearing hearing aids. , 1980, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[32]  J. S. Bradley.  Predictors of speech intelligibility in rooms. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  D B Hawkins,et al.  Signal-to-noise ratio advantage of binaural hearing aids and directional microphones under different levels of reverberation. , 1984, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[34]  A. Maxon,et al.  Classroom Amplification Use , 1991 .