Quantification and Clinical Relevance of Head Motion During Computed Tomography

Objective:To quantify the 3-dimensional translation and rotation components of head motion during computed tomography and to analyze the influence of such motion on perceptible artifacts and distortion of volume image data sets. Methods:Using high-precision optoelectronic motion-capture technology, changes in patient head position during axial CT scanning were registered in 20 cases and 2 phantoms with a spatial relative resolution better than 0.003 cm. Statistical analysis was performed on a base of 6-dimensional measurement-vectors, each with 3 translation and 3 rotation values. Because of the recording frequency of the tracking system, more than 80,000 values were included in a statistical analysis. Results:All 20 patients had head motion during the CT scanning, with only 4 of 20 patients showing perceptible motion artifacts. The frequency, the extent, and the direction of the movements did not correlate with either the observations made by the radiologic staff or with the patient’s subjective estimation of comfort. Translation movements of the head during CT accounted for a maximum of 0.5 cm and rotations of more than 2° without perceptible motion artifacts. The extent of positional changes of the head was found to correlate with the duration of scanning (Pearson’s correlation coefficient: 0.647 for translation shifts, 0.453 for rotation shifts). The mean direction of head motion could be characterized predominantly as a rotation around the longitudinal axis of the body (xy plane) at a significance level of 0.01. Conclusion:Computed tomography evaluations of the head performed without rigid fixation suffer a spatial distortion of the volume image data sets, caused by interimage motion. The absence of motion artifacts is not correlated with the absence of motion.

[1]  W Schlegel,et al.  Photogrammetric accuracy measurements of head holder systems used for fractionated radiotherapy. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  S Thesen,et al.  Prospective acquisition correction for head motion with image‐based tracking for real‐time fMRI , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  U. Baum,et al.  Morphologische und funktionelle Diagnostik der Kopf-Hals-Region mit Mehrzeilen-Spiral-CT , 1999, Der Radiologe.

[4]  B. Westermann,et al.  Online head motion tracking applied to the patient registration problem. , 2000, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[5]  R K Ten Haken,et al.  Three-dimensional motion analysis of an improved head immobilization system for simulation, CT, MRI, and PET imaging. , 1991, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Retrospective intermodality registration techniques for images of the head: surface-based versus volume-based , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  K Ehrenberger,et al.  Experiences in intraoperative computer-aided navigation in ENT sinus surgery with the Aesculap navigation system. , 1998, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[8]  M Vembar,et al.  Reduced partial volume artifacts using spiral computed tomography and an integrating interpolator. , 1999, Medical physics.

[9]  Norma C. Linney,et al.  Organ motion detection in CT images using opposite rays in fan-beam projection systems , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  S J Riederer,et al.  Image metric‐based correction (Autocorrection) of motion effects: Analysis of image metrics , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  S J Riederer,et al.  A prospective approach to correct for inter‐image head rotation in FMRI , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  G Ferrigno,et al.  Real-time three-dimensional motion analysis for patient positioning verification. , 2000, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[13]  Robert J. Maciunas,et al.  Registration of head CT images to physical space using a weighted combination of points and surfaces [image-guided surgery] , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  M C Gilardi,et al.  Head holder for PET, CT, and MR studies. , 1991, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[15]  H Shirato,et al.  Use of an implanted marker and real-time tracking of the marker for the positioning of prostate and bladder cancers. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  G Ferrigno,et al.  Real-time opto-electronic verification of patient position in breast cancer radiotherapy. , 2000, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[17]  H Bergmann,et al.  Placement of Endosteal Implants in the Zygoma after Maxillectomy: A Cadaver Study Using Surgical Navigation , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[18]  W. Sewchand,et al.  Patient immobilization during CT for treatment planning of head and neck cancer. , 1986, Radiology.

[19]  C Windischberger,et al.  Quantification of fMRI artifact reduction by a novel plaster cast head holder , 2000, Human brain mapping.