Tweets That Matter: Evidence From a Randomized Field Experiment in Japan
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Petty,et al. The need to evaluate. , 1996 .
[2] A. Halpern,et al. Implicit memory for music in Alzheimer's disease. , 2000, Neuropsychology.
[3] Isabelle Peretz,et al. Implicit and explicit memory for music in old and young adults. , 1999 .
[4] S. Iyengar. Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. , 1991 .
[5] Cindy D. Kam,et al. Name Recognition and Candidate Support , 2013 .
[6] Kathleen M. McGraw,et al. An Impression-Driven Model of Candidate Evaluation , 1989, American Political Science Review.
[7] C. Funk. The impact of scandal on candidate evaluations: An experimental test of the role of candidate traits , 1996 .
[8] R. Moreland,et al. Is stimulus recognition a necessary condition for the occurrence of exposure effects? , 1977, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[9] Soo Youn Oh,et al. To Personalize or Depersonalize? When and How Politicians' Personalized Tweets Affect the Public's Reactions , 2012 .
[10] H. E. Krugman. THE IMPACT OF TELEVISION ADVERTISING: LEARNING WITHOUT INVOLVEMENT , 1965 .
[11] Larry M. Bartels. Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice , 1988 .
[12] David J. Stang,et al. Methodological factors in mere exposure research. , 1974 .
[13] Michaela Maier,et al. Personalization of Politics A Critical Review and Agenda for Research , 2010 .
[14] R. P. McGlynn,et al. Perception of cartoon humor as a function of familiarity and anxiety level. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[15] Brian Newman. Integrity and Presidential Approval, 1980–2000 , 2003 .
[16] John G. Seamon,et al. The mere exposure effect is based on implicit memory: Effects of stimulus type, encoding conditions, and number of exposures on recognition and affect judgments. , 1995 .
[17] G. Enli,et al. PERSONALIZED CAMPAIGNS IN PARTY-CENTRED POLITICS , 2013 .
[18] Dean S. Karlan,et al. Does the Media Matter? A Field Experiment Measuring the Effect of Newspapers on Voting Behavior and Political Opinions , 2006 .
[19] D. Fortin,et al. Interactivity and vividness effects on social presence and involvement with a web-based advertisement , 2005 .
[20] Yusaku Horiuchi,et al. Should Candidates Smile to Win Elections? An Application of Automated Face Recognition Technology , 2011 .
[21] J. Hamilton. All the News That's Fit to Sell: How the Market Transforms Information into News , 2003 .
[22] R. Zajonc. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .
[23] Raymond W. Preiss,et al. Mass Media Effects Research , 2006 .
[24] James G. Gimpel,et al. How Large and Long-lasting Are the Persuasive Effects of Televised Campaign Ads? Results from a Randomized Field Experiment , 2011, American Political Science Review.
[25] Larry M. Bartels. Issue Voting Under Uncertainty: An Empirical Test , 1986 .
[26] A. Todorov,et al. Inferences of Competence from Faces Predict Election Outcomes , 2005, Science.
[27] Kathleen M. McGraw,et al. Political judgment : structure and process , 1995 .
[28] Kyu S. Hahn,et al. Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use , 2009 .
[29] M. Schudson. The objectivity norm in American journalism* , 2001 .
[30] R. Bornstein. Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. , 1989 .
[31] S. Iyengar,et al. Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Electorate , 1995 .
[32] S. Iyengar. Media Politics: A Citizen's Guide , 2006 .
[33] M W Matlin,et al. Response competition, recognition, and affect. , 1971, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[34] Kyu S. Hahn,et al. Consumer Demand for Election News: The Horserace Sells , 2004, The Journal of Politics.
[35] D. Hallin. Sound Bite News: Television Coverage of Elections, 1968–1988 , 1992 .
[36] Daniela V. Dimitrova,et al. The Effects of Digital Media on Political Knowledge and Participation in Election Campaigns , 2014, Commun. Res..
[37] Petra Kaufmann,et al. Experimental And Quasi Experimental Designs For Research , 2016 .
[38] M. Lodge,et al. The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation , 1995, American Political Science Review.
[39] M. Lyons. Presidential Character Revisited , 1997 .
[40] A. Downs. An Economic Theory of Democracy , 1957 .
[41] Eun-Ju Lee,et al. Are They Talking to Me? Cognitive and Affective Effects of Interactivity in Politicians' Twitter Communication , 2012, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..
[42] Rens Vliegenthart,et al. Getting closer: The effects of personalized and interactive online political communication , 2013 .
[43] S. Rosenberg,et al. The Image and the Vote: The Effect of Candidate Presentation on Jfbter Preference , 1986 .
[44] H. E. Krugman,et al. PASSIVE LEARNING FROM TELEVISION , 1970 .
[45] R. Bornstein,et al. Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[46] Diana C. Mutz. Effects of “In-Your-Face” Television Discourse on Perceptions of a Legitimate Opposition , 2007, American Political Science Review.
[47] J. Strömbäck,et al. Interpretive journalism: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings , 2012 .
[48] Dennis F. Kinsey,et al. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns , 1993 .
[49] Scott Keeter,et al. Natural Treatment and Control Settings for Research on the Effects of Television. , 1986 .
[50] Justin Grimmer,et al. How Words and Money Cultivate a Personal Vote: The Effect of Legislator Credit Claiming on Constituent Credit Allocation , 2012, American Political Science Review.
[51] Eszter Hargittai,et al. The tweet smell of celebrity success: Explaining variation in Twitter adoption among a diverse group of young adults , 2011, New Media Soc..
[52] Pablo Barberá. Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data , 2015, Political Analysis.
[53] David E. Broockman,et al. Do Online Advertisements Increase Political Candidates’ Name Recognition or Favorability? Evidence from Randomized Field Experiments , 2014 .
[54] L. Keele,et al. Identification, Inference and Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Mediation Effects , 2010, 1011.1079.
[55] J. Zaller,et al. WHO GETS THE NEWS? ALTERNATIVE MEASURES OF NEWS RECEPTION AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH , 1993 .
[56] C. F. Kao,et al. The efficient assessment of need for cognition. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.
[57] Tamir Sheafer,et al. The Personalization(s) of Politics: Israel, 1949–2003 , 2007 .
[58] S. Chaiken,et al. The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[59] Cliff Zukin,et al. Passive Learning: When the Media Environment Is the Message , 1984 .
[60] Martin Johnson,et al. Polarized Political Communication, Oppositional Media Hostility, and Selective Exposure , 2012 .
[61] N. Brody,et al. Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: II. Effect of delay between study and test , 1983 .
[62] Kyu S. Hahn,et al. Cross‐National versus Individual‐Level Differences in Political Information: A Media Systems Perspective , 2010 .
[63] W. Bennett,et al. A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication , 2008 .
[64] Scott Clifford,et al. Comparing Contemporaneous Laboratory and Field Experiments on Media Effects , 2013 .
[65] Charles K. Atkin,et al. Effects of Political Advertising , 1976 .
[66] Patrick A. Pierce. Political Sophistication and the Use of Candidate Traits in Candidate Evaluation , 1993 .
[67] Michael Boss. Economic theory of democracy , 1974 .
[68] Donald P. Green,et al. Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation , 2012 .
[69] Larry M. Bartels,et al. Why Are American Presidential Election Campaign Polls So Variable When Votes Are So Predictable ? , 2004 .
[70] David Tewksbury,et al. Accidentally Informed: Incidental News Exposure on the World Wide Web , 2001 .
[71] Ann N. Crigler,et al. Common Knowledge: News and the Construction of Political Meaning. , 1993 .
[72] D. A. Kenny,et al. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[73] R. Kronauer,et al. Affective Discrimination of Stimuli That Cannot Be Recognized , 2022 .
[74] Thomas J. Leeper,et al. Learning More from Political Communication Experiments: Pretreatment and Its Effects , 2012 .
[75] Kevin Arceneaux,et al. Communication, Persuasion, and the Conditioning Value of Selective Exposure: Like Minds May Unite and Divide but They Mostly Tune Out , 2013 .
[76] Soo Youn Oh,et al. Seek and You Shall Find? How Need for Orientation Moderates Knowledge Gain from Twitter Use , 2013 .
[77] M. Wattenberg,et al. Schematic Assessments of Presidential Candidates , 1986, American Political Science Review.
[78] Itai Himelboim,et al. Birds of a Feather Tweet Together: Integrating Network and Content Analyses to Examine Cross-Ideology Exposure on Twitter , 2013, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..