Carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of noninvasive tests--individual patient data meta-analysis.

PURPOSE To find clinically relevant estimates of the accuracy of noninvasive imaging-Doppler ultrasonography (US), computed tomographic (CT) angiography, magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, and contrast material-enhanced MR angiography-in diagnosing both severe and moderate symptomatic carotid artery stenosis; to ascertain the effect of prespecified clinical factors and clinical setting on diagnostic accuracy; and to estimate the probability of agreement between two noninvasive tests. MATERIALS AND METHODS Original principal investigators obtained ethics approval for each data set. All data were anonymized. Individual patient data sets (IPDs) for noninvasive imaging tests were used to determine sensitivity, specificity, and agreement between the tests for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis; to compare ipsilateral with contralateral arteries; to compare IPDs with literature estimates; to compare routine audit and research data; and to determine the effect of age and sex on sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS Contrast-enhanced MR angiography was the most accurate (sensitivity, 0.85 [30 of 35]; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69, 0.93; and specificity, 0.85 [67 of 78]; 95% CI: 0.76, 0.92) for 70%-99% symptomatic stenosis. Sensitivity for a 50%-69% stenosis was poor, although data were limited. Sensitivity and specificity were generally lower in the ipsilateral than in the contralateral artery. IPD estimates were lower than literature values. Results of comparison of research with audit-derived data were inconclusive. Neither age nor sex affected accuracy. Agreement was better between two Doppler US tests and between two contrast-enhanced MR angiographic tests than it was between Doppler US and contrast-enhanced MR angiography, except for a 70%-99% symptomatic stenosis. CONCLUSION Primary studies should distinguish ipsilateral from contralateral arteries and carefully describe the patients' characteristics and study environment. The literature overestimates noninvasive imaging accuracy. More data are needed to inform physicians in routine clinical practice.

[1]  J. Reed,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Duplex Scanning Concordance in Detecting Severe Carotid Stenosis , 1995 .

[2]  P. Nederkoorn,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Duplex Ultrasound in Patients Suspected of Carotid Artery Disease: The Ipsilateral Versus Contralateral Artery , 2005, Stroke.

[3]  D. Kallmes,et al.  Specificity of MR angiography as a confirmatory test for carotid artery stenosis: is it valid? , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  P. Humphrey,et al.  Complications of cerebral angiography in patients with symptomatic carotid territory ischaemia screened by carotid ultrasound. , 1993, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[5]  P. Nederkoorn,et al.  Systematic Review of Computed Tomographic Angiography for Assessment of Carotid Artery Disease , 2004, Stroke.

[6]  J. Gillard,et al.  Measuring Carotid Stenosis on Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography: Diagnostic Performance and Reproducibility of 3 Different Methods , 2004, Stroke.

[7]  G M Hathout,et al.  Ability to use duplex US to quantify internal carotid arterial stenoses: fact or fiction? , 2000, Radiology.

[8]  E. Sala,et al.  Evaluation of carotid stenosis with axial high-resolution black-blood MR imaging , 2004, European Radiology.

[9]  D. Kallmes,et al.  Specificity of MR angiography as a confirmatory test of carotid artery stenosis. , 1996, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[10]  J. Slattery,et al.  Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) , 1998, The Lancet.

[11]  J. Wardlaw,et al.  How does the degree of carotid stenosis affect the accuracy and interobserver variability of magnetic resonance angiography? , 2001, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[12]  G. Scotti,et al.  Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading. , 2005, Radiology.

[13]  P. Thomson.  A hybrid paired and unpaired analysis for the comparison of proportions. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  D B Matchar,et al.  Noninvasive Carotid Artery Testing: A Meta-analytic Review , 1995, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  S. Pendlebury,et al.  Critical appraisal of the design and reporting of studies of imaging and measurement of carotid stenosis. , 2000, Stroke.

[16]  C. Metz.  Constraints on the sensitivity and specificity of "logically" merged test results. , 1991, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  A. Lepoutre,et al.  Critical review of non- or minimally invasive methods (duplex ultrasonography, MR- and CT-angiography) for evaluating stenosis of the proximal internal carotid artery. , 2002, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[18]  J. Slattery,et al.  Equivalence of Measurements of Carotid Stenosis: A Comparison of Three Methods on 1001 Angiograms , 1994, Stroke.

[19]  D. Sackett,et al.  Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  M. Müllner,et al.  Quantification of internal carotid artery stenosis with duplex US: comparative analysis of different flow velocity criteria. , 2004, Radiology.

[21]  W. Moore.  For severe carotid stenosis found on ultrasound, further arterial evaluation is unnecessary. , 2003, Stroke.

[22]  S. C. Johnston,et al.  Evaluation of carotid stenosis using CT angiography in the initial evaluation of stroke and TIA , 2004, Neurology.

[23]  J. Wardlaw,et al.  Non-invasive imaging compared with intra-arterial angiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis , 2006, The Lancet.

[24]  A J Molyneux,et al.  Complications of cerebral angiography for patients with mild carotid territory ischaemia being considered for carotid endarterectomy. , 1990, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[25]  S. Gutnikov,et al.  From subgroups to individuals: general principles and the example of carotid endarterectomy , 2005, The Lancet.

[26]  A. Brabazon,et al.  Prediction of the Exact Degree of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis Using an Artificial Neural Network Based on Duplex Velocity Measurements , 2005, Annals of vascular surgery.

[27]  David Moher,et al.  Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. , 2004, Family practice.

[28]  J. Bamford,et al.  Use of magnetic resonance angiography to select candidates with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis for surgery: systematic review , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[29]  L. Goldstein,et al.  Clinical carotid endarterectomy decision making , 2001, Neurology.

[30]  J. Reed.  Meta-analysis of the reliability of noninvasive carotid studies. , 1991, Biomedical instrumentation & technology.